Preloader

SEAM is a spatial single nuclear metabolomics method for dissecting tissue microenvironment

  • 1.

    Quail, D. F. & Joyce, J. A. Microenvironmental regulation of tumor progression and metastasis. Nat. Med. 19, 1423–1437 (2013).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 2.

    Riquelme, P. A., Drapeau, E. & Doetsch, F. Brain micro-ecologies: neural stem cell niches in the adult mammalian brain. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 363, 123–137 (2008).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 3.

    Swain, P. S., Elowitz, M. B. & Siggia, E. D. Intrinsic and extrinsic contributions to stochasticity in gene expression. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99, 12795–12800 (2002).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 4.

    Zhang, J. W. & Li, L. H. Stem cell niche: microenvironment and beyond. J. Biol. Chem. 283, 9499–9503 (2008).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 5.

    Shukla, S. D. & Lim, R. W. Epigenetic effects of ethanol on the liver and gastrointestinal system. Alcohol Res. 35, 47 (2013).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 6.

    Benly, P. Role of histamine in acute inflammation. J. Pharm. Sci. Res. 7, 373–376 (2015).

    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • 7.

    Stuart, T. & Satija, R. Integrative single-cell analysis. Nat. Rev. Genet. 20, 257–272 (2019).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 8.

    Pareek, V., Tian, H., Winograd, N. & Benkovic, S. J. Metabolomics and mass spectrometry imaging reveal channeled de novo purine synthesis in cells. Science 368, 0036–8075 (2020).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • 9.

    Kennedy, D. E. et al. Novel specialized cell state and spatial compartments within the germinal center. Nat. Immunol. 21, 660–670 (2020).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 10.

    Stoeckli, M., Chaurand, P., Hallahan, D. E. & Caprioli, R. M. Imaging mass spectrometry: a new technology for the analysis of protein expression in mammalian tissues. Nat. Med. 7, 493–496 (2001).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 11.

    Sun, C. et al. Spatially resolved metabolomics to discover tumor-associated metabolic alterations. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 52–57 (2019).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 12.

    Hare, D. J. et al. Three-dimensional atlas of iron, copper, and zinc in the mouse cerebrum and brainstem. Anal. Chem. 84, 3990–3997 (2012).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 13.

    Sjövall, P., Lausmaa, J. & Johansson, B. Mass spectrometric imaging of lipids in brain tissue. Anal. Chem. 76, 4271–4278 (2004).

    PubMed 
    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 14.

    Kompauer, M., Heiles, S. & Spengler, B. Atmospheric pressure MALDI mass spectrometry imaging of tissues and cells at 1.4-μm lateral resolution. Nat. Methods 14, 90–96 (2017).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 15.

    Niehaus, M., Soltwisch, J., Belov, M. E. & Dreisewerd, K. Transmission-mode MALDI-2 mass spectrometry imaging of cells and tissues at subcellular resolution. Nat. Methods 16, 925–931 (2019).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 16.

    Yin, R. et al. High spatial resolution imaging of mouse pancreatic islets using nanospray desorption electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 90, 6548–6555 (2018).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 17.

    Passarelli, M. K. et al. The 3D OrbiSIMS-label-free metabolic imaging with subcellular lateral resolution and high mass-resolving power. Nat. Methods 14, 1175 (2017).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 18.

    Vickovic, S. et al. High-definition spatial transcriptomics for in situ tissue profiling. Nat. Methods 16, 987–990 (2019).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 19.

    Keren, L. et al. A structured tumor-immune microenvironment in triple negative breast cancer revealed by multiplexed ion beam imaging. Cell 174, 1373 (2018).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 20.

    Xia, C., Fan, J., Emanuel, G., Hao, J. & Zhuang, X. Spatial transcriptome profiling by MERFISH reveals subcellular RNA compartmentalization and cell cycle-dependent gene expression. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 19490–19499 (2019).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 21.

    Keren, L. et al. MIBI–TOF: a multiplexed imaging platform relates cellular phenotypes and tissue structure. Sci. Adv. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aax5851 (2019).

  • 22.

    Robertson, A. R. The CIE 1976 color-difference formulae. Color Res. Appl. 2, 0361–2317 (1977).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 23.

    Halpern, K. B. et al. Single-cell spatial reconstruction reveals global division of labour in the mammalian liver. Nature 542, 352–356 (2017).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 24.

    Park, J. et al. Single-cell transcriptomics of the mouse kidney reveals potential cellular targets of kidney disease. Science 360, 758–763 (2018).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 25.

    Moor, A. E. et al. Spatial reconstruction of single enterocytes uncovers broad zonation along the intestinal villus axis. Cell 175, 1156–1167 (2018).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 26.

    Becht, E. et al. Dimensionality reduction for visualizing single-cell data using UMAP. Nat. Biotechnol. 37, 38–44 (2019).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 27.

    Fonville, J. M. et al. Hyperspectral visualization of mass spectrometry imaging data. Anal. Chem. 85, 1415–1423 (2013).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 28.

    Abdelmoula, W. M. et al. Data-driven identification of prognostic tumor subpopulations using spatially mapped t-SNE of mass spectrometry imaging data. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 12244–12249 (2016).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 29.

    Smets, T. et al. Evaluation of distance metrics and spatial autocorrelation in uniform manifold approximation and projection applied to mass spectrometry imaging data. Anal. Chem. 91, 5706–5714 (2019).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 30.

    Wang, Y. J. et al. Multiplexed in situ imaging mass cytometry analysis of the human endocrine pancreas and immune system in type 1 diabetes. Cell Metab. 29, 769–783 e764 (2019).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 31.

    Koller, D. & Friedman, N. Probabilistic Graphical Models: Principles and Techniques (MIT Press, 2009).

  • 32.

    Hinton, G. E. & Salakhutdinov, R. R. Reducing the dimensionality of data with neural networks. Science 313, 504–507 (2006).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 33.

    Hinton, G. in Neural Networks: Tricks of the Trade (eds Montavon, G., Orr, G. B. & Müller, K. R.) (Springer, 2010).

  • 34.

    Le Roux, N. & Bengio, Y. Representational power of restricted Boltzmann machines and deep belief networks. Neural Comput. 20, 1631–1649 (2008).

    PubMed 
    Article 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 35.

    Bengio, Y., Courville, A. & Vincent, P. Representation learning: a review and new perspectives. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. 35, 1798–1828 (2013).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 36.

    Boykov, Y., Veksler, O. & Zabih, R. Markov random fields with efficient approximations. In Proc. 1998 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 648–655 https://doi.org/10.1109/Cvpr.1998.698673 (IEEE, 1998).

  • 37.

    Boykov, Y., Veksler, O. & Zabih, R. Fast approximate energy minimization via graph cuts. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. 23, 1222–1239 (2001).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 38.

    Doersch, C., Gupta, A. & Efros, A. A. Unsupervised visual representation learning by context prediction. In Proc. 2015 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) 1422–1430 (IEEE, 2015).

  • 39.

    Noroozi, M. & Favaro, P. Unsupervised learning of visual representations by solving jigsaw puzzles. In Proc. Computer Vision: ECCV 2016, Vol. 6 9910, 69–84 (2016).

  • 40.

    Noroozi, M., Pirsiavash, H. & Favaro, P. Representation learning by learning to count. In Proc. 2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) 5899–5907 https://doi.org/10.1109/Iccv.2017.628 (IEEE, 2017).

  • 41.

    Wang, B., Zhu, J. J., Pierson, E., Ramazzotti, D. & Batzoglou, S. Visualization and analysis of single-cell RNA-seq data by kernel-based similarity learning. Nat. Methods 14, 414–416 (2017).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 42.

    Ramdas, A., Trillos, N. G. & Cuturi, M. On Wasserstein two-sample testing and related families of nonparametric tests. Entropy 19, https://doi.org/10.3390/e19020047 (2017).

  • 43.

    Hartmann, F. J. et al. Single-cell metabolic profiling of human cytotoxic T cells. Nat. Biotechnol. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-020-0651-8 (2020).

  • 44.

    Eng, C. L. et al. Transcriptome-scale super-resolved imaging in tissues by RNA seqFISH. Nature 568, 235–239 (2019).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 45.

    Ben-Moshe, S. & Itzkovitz, S. Spatial heterogeneity in the mammalian liver. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41575-019-0134-x (2019).

  • 46.

    Sano, K. et al. Distributional variation of P-450 immunoreactive hepatocytes in human-liver disorders. Hum. Pathol. 20, 1015–1020 (1989).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 47.

    Brosch, M. et al. Epigenomic map of human liver reveals principles of zonated morphogenic and metabolic control. Nat. Commun. 9, 4150 (2018).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • 48.

    Shetty, S., Lalor, P. F. & Adams, D. H. Liver sinusoidal endothelial cells – gatekeepers of hepatic immunity. Nat. Rev. Gastro Hepat. 15, 555–567 (2018).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 49.

    Strauss, O., Phillips, A., Ruggiero, K., Bartlett, A. & Dunbar, P. R. Immunofluorescence identifies distinct subsets of endothelial cells in the human liver. Sci. Rep. 7, 44356 (2017).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 50.

    Kietzmann, T. Metabolic zonation of the liver: the oxygen gradient revisited. Redox Biol. 11, 622–630 (2017).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 51.

    Ramachandran, P. et al. Resolving the fibrotic niche of human liver cirrhosis at single-cell level. Nature https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1631-3 (2019).

  • 52.

    Wu, X., Jiang, R., Zhang, M. Q. & Li, S. Network-based global inference of human disease genes. Mol. Syst. Biol. 4, 189 (2008).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • 53.

    Pillai, S. M. & Meredith, D. SLC36A4 (hPAT4) is a high affinity amino acid transporter when expressed in Xenopus laevis oocytes. J. Biol. Chem. 286, 2455–2460 (2011).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 54.

    Féral, C. C. et al. CD98hc (SLC3A2) participates in fibronectin matrix assembly by mediating integrin signaling. J. Cell Biol. 178, 1540–8140 (2007).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • 55.

    Wang, S. et al. Lysosomal amino acid transporter SLC38A9 signals arginine sufficiency to mTORC1. Science 347, 188–194 (2015).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 56.

    Reimer, R. J. SLC17: a functionally diverse family of organic anion transporters. Mol. Aspects Med. 34, 350–359 (2013).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 57.

    Kempson, S. A., Zhou, Y. & Danbolt, N. C. The betaine/GABA transporter and betaine: roles in brain, kidney and liver. Front. Physiol. 5, 159 (2014).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 58.

    Wagner, C. A., Lang, F. & Bröer, S. Function and structure of heterodimeric amino acid transporters. Am. J. Physiol.-Cell Physiol. 281, C1077–C1093 (2001).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 59.

    May, C. J., Canavan, H. E. & Castner, D. G. Quantitative X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy and time-of-flight secondary ion mass spectrometry characterization of the components in DNA. Anal. Chem. 76, 1114–1122 (2004).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 60.

    Debois, D., Bralet, M.-P., Le Naour, F., Brunelle, A. & Laprévote, O. In situ lipidomic analysis of nonalcoholic fatty liver by cluster TOF-SIMS imaging. Anal. Chem. 81, 2823–2831 (2009).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 61.

    Seyer, A. et al. Lipidomic and spatio-temporal imaging of fat by mass spectrometry in mice duodenum during lipid digestion. PLoS ONE8, e58224 (2013).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 62.

    Brulet, M. et al. Lipid mapping of colonic mucosa by cluster TOF-SIMS imaging and multivariate analysis in cftr knockout mice. J. Lipid Res. 51, 3034–3045 (2010).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 63.

    Magnusson, Y. K., Friberg, P., Sjövall, P., Malm, J. & Chen, Y. TOF-SIMS analysis of lipid accumulation in the skeletal muscle of ob/ob mice. Obesity 16, 2745–2753 (2008).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 64.

    Magnusson, Y. et al. Lipid imaging of human skeletal muscle using TOF-SIMS with bismuth cluster ion as a primary ion source. Clinical Physiol. Funct. Imag. 28, 202–209 (2008).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 65.

    Nothias, L. F. et al. Feature-based molecular networking in the GNPS analysis environment. Nat. Methods 17, 905–908 (2020).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 66.

    Laponogov, I., Sadawi, N., Galea, D., Mirnezami, R. & Veselkov, K. A. ChemDistiller: an engine for metabolite annotation in mass spectrometry. Bioinformatics 34, 2096–2102 (2018).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 67.

    Dührkop, K. et al. Systematic classification of unknown metabolites using high-resolution fragmentation mass spectra. Nat. Biotechnol. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-020-0740-8 (2020).

  • 68.

    Palmer, A. et al. FDR-controlled metabolite annotation for high-resolution imaging mass spectrometry. Nat. Methods 14, 57–60 (2017).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 69.

    Schindelin, J. et al. Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat. Methods 9, 676–682 (2012).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 70.

    Chen, J. et al. Spatial transcriptomic analysis of cryosectioned tissue samples with Geo-seq. Nat. Protoc. 12, 566–580 (2017).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 71.

    Martin, M. Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads. EMBnet. J. 17, 10–12 (2011).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 72.

    Frankish, A. et al. GENCODE reference annotation for the human and mouse genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 47, D766–D773 (2019).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 73.

    Dobin, A. et al. STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner. Bioinformatics 29, 15–21 (2013).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 74.

    Li, H. et al. The sequence alignment/map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 25, 2078–2079 (2009).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • 75.

    Anders, S., Pyl, P. T. & Huber, W. HTSeq-a Python framework to work with high-throughput sequencing data. Bioinformatics 31, 166–169 (2015).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 76.

    Love, M. I., Huber, W. & Anders, S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 15, https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8 (2014).

  • 77.

    Yu, G. C., Wang, L. G., Han, Y. Y. & He, Q. Y. clusterProfiler: an R package for comparing biological themes among gene clusters. Omics 16, 284–287 (2012).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 78.

    Zhang, Y. Y., Brady, M. & Smith, S. Segmentation of brain MR images through a hidden Markov random field model and the expectation-maximization algorithm. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 20, 45–57 (2001).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 79.

    Panjwani, D. K. & Healey, G. Markov random-field models for unsupervised segmentation of textured color images. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. 17, 939–954 (1995).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 80.

    Hammersley, J. M. & Clifford, P. Markov Fields on Finite Graphs and Lattices (Unpublished manuscript 46, 1971).

  • 81.

    Clifford, P. in Disorder in Physical Systems: A Volume in Honour of John M. Hammersley (eds Grimmett, G. R. & Welsh, D. J. A.) (Oxford Univ. Press, 1990).

  • 82.

    Besag, J. Spatial interaction and statistical-analysis of lattice systems. J. R. Stat. Soc. B. Met. 36, 192–236 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  • 83.

    Panjwani, D. K. & Healey, G. Markov random-field model for unsupervised segmentation of textured color images. IEEE T. Pattern Anal. 17, 1128–1128 (1995).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 84.

    Kato, Z. & Pong, T. C. A Markov random field image segmentation model for color textured images. Image Vision Comput. 24, 1103–1114 (2006).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 85.

    Hinton, G., Vinyals, O. & Dean, J. Distilling the knowledge in a neural network. Preprint at arXiv https://arxiv.org/abs/1503.02531 (2015).

  • 86.

    Schürch, C. M. et al. Coordinated cellular neighborhoods orchestrate antitumoral immunity at the colorectal cancer invasive front. Cell https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2020.07.005 (2020).

  • 87.

    Moncada, R. et al. Integrating microarray-based spatial transcriptomics and single-cell RNA-seq reveals tissue architecture in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas. Nat. Biotechnol. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-019-0392-8 (2020).

  • 88.

    Wolf, F. A., Angerer, P. & Theis, F. J. SCANPY: large-scale single-cell gene expression data analysis. Genome Biol. 19, 15 (2018).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 89.

    Virtanen, P. et al. SciPy 1.0: fundamental algorithms for scientific computing in Python. Nat. Methods 17, 261–272 (2020).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Source link