Cech, T. R. & Steitz, J. A. The noncoding RNA revolution—trashing old rules to forge new ones. Cell 157, 77–94 (2014).
Google Scholar
Battich, N., Stoeger, T. & Pelkmans, L. Image-based transcriptomics in thousands of single human cells at single-molecule resolution. Nat. Methods 10, 1127–1133 (2013).
Google Scholar
Wang, K. C. & Chang, H. Y. Molecular mechanisms of long noncoding RNAs. Mol. Cell 43, 904–914 (2011).
Google Scholar
Buxbaum, A. R., Haimovich, G. & Singer, R. H. In the right place at the right time: visualizing and understanding mRNA localization. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 16, 95–109 (2015).
Google Scholar
Jaschke, A. Genetically encoded RNA photoswitches as tools for the control of gene expression. FEBS Lett. 586, 2106–2111 (2012).
Google Scholar
You, M. & Jaffrey, S. R. Designing optogenetically controlled RNA for regulating biological systems. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 1352, 13–19 (2015).
Google Scholar
Tischer, D. & Weiner, O. D. Illuminating cell signalling with optogenetic tools. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 15, 551–558 (2014).
Google Scholar
Zhang, L., Chen, C., Fan, X. & Tang, X. Photomodulating gene expression by using caged siRNAs with single-aptamer modification. Chembiochem 19, 1259–1263 (2018).
Google Scholar
Zhang, L. et al. Caged circular siRNAs for photomodulation of gene expression in cells and mice. Chem. Sci. 9, 44–51 (2018).
Google Scholar
Wu, L. et al. Caged circular antisense oligonucleotides for photomodulation of RNA digestion and gene expression in cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, 677–686 (2013).
Google Scholar
Ando, H., Furuta, T., Tsien, R. Y. & Okamoto, H. Photo-mediated gene activation using caged RNA/DNA in zebrafish embryos. Nat. Genet. 28, 317–325 (2001).
Google Scholar
Ando, H., Furuta, T. & Okamoto, H. Photo-mediated gene activation by using caged mRNA in zebrafish embryos. Methods Cell. Biol. 77, 159–171 (2004).
Google Scholar
Chaulk, S. G. & MacMillan, A. M. Caged RNA: photo-control of a ribozyme reaction. Nucleic Acids Res. 26, 3173–3178 (1998).
Google Scholar
Zhou, W. et al. Spatiotemporal control of CRISPR/Cas9 function in cells and zebrafish using light-activated guide RNA. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 59, 8998–9003 (2020).
Wang, P. et al. Mapping spatial transcriptome with light-activated proximity-dependent RNA labeling. Nat. Chem. Biol. 15, 1110–1119 (2019).
Google Scholar
Benhalevy, D., Anastasakis, D. G. & Hafner, M. Proximity-CLIP provides a snapshot of protein-occupied RNA elements in subcellular compartments. Nat. Methods 15, 1074–1082 (2018).
Google Scholar
Gonzaga, E. R. Role of UV light in photodamage, skin aging, and skin cancer: importance of photoprotection. Am. J. Clin. Dermatol. 10, 19–24 (2009).
Google Scholar
Kawano, F., Shi, F. & Yazawa, M. Optogenetics: switching with red and blue. Nat. Chem. Biol. 13, 573–574 (2017).
Google Scholar
Pichon, X. et al. RNA binding protein/RNA element interactions and the control of translation. Curr. Protein Pept. Sci. 13, 294–304 (2012).
Google Scholar
Abil, Z., Denard, C. A. & Zhao, H. Modular assembly of designer PUF proteins for specific post-transcriptional regulation of endogenous RNA. J. Biol. Eng. 8, 7 (2014).
Google Scholar
Weber, A. M. et al. A blue light receptor that mediates RNA binding and translational regulation. Nat. Chem. Biol. 15, 1085–1092 (2019).
Google Scholar
Yamada, M., Nagasaki, S. C., Ozawa, T. & Imayoshi, I. Light-mediated control of gene expression in mammalian cells. Neurosci. Res. 152, 66–77 (2020).
Google Scholar
Deisseroth, K. Optogenetics: 10 years of microbial opsins in neuroscience. Nat. Neurosci. 18, 1213–1225 (2015).
Google Scholar
Xu, X. et al. A single-component optogenetic system allows stringent switch of gene expression in yeast cells. ACS Synth. Biol. 7, 2045–2053 (2018).
Google Scholar
Chen, X. et al. An extraordinary stringent and sensitive light-switchable gene expression system for bacterial cells. Cell Res. 26, 854–857 (2016).
Google Scholar
Wang, X., Chen, X. & Yang, Y. Spatiotemporal control of gene expression by a light-switchable transgene system. Nat. Methods 9, 266–269 (2012).
Google Scholar
Li, X. et al. A single-component light sensor system allows highly tunable and direct activation of gene expression in bacterial cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 48, e33 (2020).
Google Scholar
Motta-Mena, L. B. et al. An optogenetic gene expression system with rapid activation and deactivation kinetics. Nat. Chem. Biol. 10, 196–202 (2014).
Google Scholar
Chen, X. et al. Synthetic dual-input mammalian genetic circuits enable tunable and stringent transcription control by chemical and light. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, 2677–2690 (2016).
Google Scholar
Graille, M. et al. Activation of the LicT transcriptional antiterminator involves a domain swing/lock mechanism provoking massive structural changes. J. Biol. Chem. 280, 14780–14789 (2005).
Google Scholar
Zoltowski, B. D. et al. Conformational switching in the fungal light sensor Vivid. Science 316, 1054–1057 (2007).
Google Scholar
van Tilbeurgh, H., Le Coq, D. & Declerck, N. Crystal structure of an activated form of the PTS regulation domain from the LicT transcriptional antiterminator. EMBO J. 20, 3789–3799 (2001).
Google Scholar
Lukinavicius, G. et al. A near-infrared fluorophore for live-cell super-resolution microscopy of cellular proteins. Nat. Chem. 5, 132–139 (2013).
Google Scholar
Mie, M., Naoki, T., Uchida, K. & Kobatake, E. Development of a split SNAP-tag protein complementation assay for visualization of protein-protein interactions in living cells. Analyst 137, 4760–4765 (2012).
Google Scholar
Yang, Y., Declerck, N., Manival, X., Aymerich, S. & Kochoyan, M. Solution structure of the LicT–RNA antitermination complex: CAT clamping RAT. EMBO J. 21, 1987–1997 (2002).
Google Scholar
Wei, H. & Wang, Z. Engineering RNA-binding proteins with diverse activities. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. RNA 6, 597–613 (2015).
Google Scholar
Zoltowski, B. D., Vaccaro, B. & Crane, B. R. Mechanism-based tuning of a LOV domain photoreceptor. Nat. Chem. Biol. 5, 827–834 (2009).
Google Scholar
Chen, X. et al. Visualizing RNA dynamics in live cells with bright and stable fluorescent RNAs. Nat. Biotechnol. 37, 1287–1293 (2019).
Google Scholar
Zhao, Y. Y. et al. Expanding RNA binding specificity and affinity of engineered PUF domains. Nucleic Acids Res. 46, 4771–4782 (2018).
Google Scholar
Gross, J. D., Matsuo, H., Fletcher, M., Sachs, A. B. & Wagner, G. Interactions of the eukaryotic translation initiation factor eIF4E. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol. 66, 397–402 (2001).
Google Scholar
Ulyanova, V., Vershinina, V. & Ilinskaya, O. Barnase and binase: twins with distinct fates. FEBS J. 278, 3633–3643 (2011).
Google Scholar
Choudhury, R., Tsai, Y. S., Dominguez, D., Wang, Y. & Wang, Z. Engineering RNA endonucleases with customized sequence specificities. Nat. Commun. 3, 1147 (2012).
Google Scholar
Knott, G. J. & Doudna, J. A. CRISPR–Cas guides the future of genetic engineering. Science 361, 866–869 (2018).
Google Scholar
Konermann, S. et al. Genome-scale transcriptional activation by an engineered CRISPR–Cas9 complex. Nature 517, 583–588 (2015).
Google Scholar
Nihongaki, Y. et al. CRISPR–Cas9-based photoactivatable transcription systems to induce neuronal differentiation. Nat. Methods 14, 963–966 (2017).
Google Scholar
Zalatan, J. G. et al. Engineering complex synthetic transcriptional programs with CRISPR RNA scaffolds. Cell 160, 339–350 (2015).
Google Scholar
Ma, H. et al. CRISPR-Sirius: RNA scaffolds for signal amplification in genome imaging. Nat. Methods 15, 928–931 (2018).
Google Scholar
Qin, P. et al. Live cell imaging of low- and non-repetitive chromosome loci using CRISPR–Cas9. Nat. Commun. 8, 14725 (2017).
Google Scholar
Ma, H. et al. Multiplexed labeling of genomic loci with dCas9 and engineered sgRNAs using CRISPRainbow. Nat. Biotechnol. 34, 528–530 (2016).
Google Scholar
Shao, S. et al. Long-term dual-color tracking of genomic loci by modified sgRNAs of the CRISPR/Cas9 system. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, e86 (2016).
Google Scholar
Chavez, A. et al. Highly efficient Cas9-mediated transcriptional programming. Nat. Methods 12, 326–328 (2015).
Google Scholar
Bubeck, F. et al. Engineered anti-CRISPR proteins for optogenetic control of CRISPR–Cas9. Nat. Methods 15, 924–927 (2018).
Google Scholar
Nihongaki, Y., Yamamoto, S., Kawano, F., Suzuki, H. & Sato, M. CRISPR–Cas9-based photoactivatable transcription system. Chem. Biol. 22, 169–174 (2015).
Google Scholar
Nihongaki, Y., Otabe, T., Ueda, Y. & Sato, M. A split CRISPR–Cpf1 platform for inducible genome editing and gene activation. Nat. Chem. Biol. 15, 882–888 (2019).
Google Scholar
Ash, C., Dubec, M., Donne, K. & Bashford, T. Effect of wavelength and beam width on penetration in light-tissue interaction using computational methods. Lasers Med. Sci. 32, 1909–1918 (2017).
Google Scholar
Polstein, L. R. & Gersbach, C. A. A light-inducible CRISPR–Cas9 system for control of endogenous gene activation. Nat. Chem. Biol. 11, 198–200 (2015).
Google Scholar
Nihongaki, Y., Kawano, F., Nakajima, T. & Sato, M. Photoactivatable CRISPR–Cas9 for optogenetic genome editing. Nat. Biotechnol. 33, 755–760 (2015).
Google Scholar
Richter, F. et al. Engineering of temperature- and light-switchable Cas9 variants. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, 10003–10014 (2016).
Google Scholar
Zhou, X. X. et al. A single-chain photoswitchable CRISPR–Cas9 architecture for light-inducible gene editing and transcription. ACS Chem. Biol. 13, 443–448 (2018).
Google Scholar
Tanenbaum, M. E., Gilbert, L. A., Qi, L. S., Weissman, J. S. & Vale, R. D. A protein-tagging system for signal amplification in gene expression and fluorescence imaging. Cell 159, 635–646 (2014).
Google Scholar
Boersma, S. et al. Multi-color single-molecule imaging uncovers extensive heterogeneity in mRNA decoding. Cell 178, 458–472 (2019).
Google Scholar
Song, W., Strack, R. L. & Jaffrey, S. R. Imaging bacterial protein expression using genetically encoded RNA sensors. Nat. Methods 10, 873–875 (2013).
Google Scholar
Paige, J. S., Nguyen-Duc, T., Song, W. & Jaffrey, S. R. Fluorescence imaging of cellular metabolites with RNA. Science 335, 1194 (2012).
Google Scholar
Liu, Y. et al. Directing cellular information flow via CRISPR signal conductors. Nat. Methods 13, 938–944 (2016).
Google Scholar
Xu, X. & Qi, L. S. A CRISPR–dCas toolbox for genetic engineering and synthetic biology. J. Mol. Biol. 431, 34–47 (2019).
Google Scholar
Datsenko, K. A. & Wanner, B. L. One-step inactivation of chromosomal genes in Escherichia coli K-12 using PCR products. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97, 6640–6645 (2000).
Google Scholar
