Preloader

Newly regenerated axons via scaffolds promote sub-lesional reorganization and motor recovery with epidural electrical stimulation

  • 1.

    Harkema, S. et al. Effect of epidural stimulation of the lumbosacral spinal cord on voluntary movement, standing, and assisted stepping after motor complete paraplegia: a case study. Lancet 377, 1938–1947 (2011).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 2.

    Grahn, P. J. et al. Mayo Clinic Proceedings 544–554 (Elsevier) 2017.

  • 3.

    Gill, M. L. et al. Neuromodulation of lumbosacral spinal networks enables independent stepping after complete paraplegia. Nat. Med. 24, 1677–1682 (2018).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 4.

    Dimitrijevic, M., Halter, J., Sharkey, P. & Sherwood, A. Epidural spinal cord stimulation and carry-over effect in chronic spinal cord injury patients. Appl Neurophysiol. 50, 449–450 (1987).

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • 5.

    Moss, C. W., Kilgore, K. L. & Peckham, P. H. A novel command signal for motor neuroprosthetic control. Neurorehabilit. Neural Repair 25, 847–854 (2011).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 6.

    Militskova, A. et al. Supraspinal and afferent signaling facilitate spinal sensorimotor network excitability after discomplete spinal cord injury: a case report. Front. Neurosci. 14, 552 (2020).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 7.

    Nicotra, A. & Ellaway, P. Thermal perception thresholds: assessing the level of human spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 44, 617–624 (2006).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 8.

    Courtine, G. et al. Transformation of nonfunctional spinal circuits into functional states after the loss of brain input. Nat. Neurosci. 12, 1333 (2009).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 9.

    Dominici, N. et al. Versatile robotic interface to evaluate, enable and train locomotion and balance after neuromotor disorders. Nat. Med. 18, 1142 (2012).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 10.

    Ichiyama, R. M., Gerasimenko, Y. P., Zhong, H., Roy, R. R. & Edgerton, V. R. Hindlimb stepping movements in complete spinal rats induced by epidural spinal cord stimulation. Neurosci. Lett. 383, 339–344 (2005).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 11.

    Gad, P. et al. Neuromodulation of motor-evoked potentials during stepping in spinal rats. J. Neurophysiol. 110, 1311–1322 (2013).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 12.

    Lavrov, I. et al. Facilitation of stepping with epidural stimulation in spinal rats: role of sensory input. J. Neurosci. 28, 7774–7780 (2008).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 13.

    Lavrov, I. et al. Epidural stimulation induced modulation of spinal locomotor networks in adult spinal rats. J. Neurosci. 28, 6022–6029 (2008).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 14.

    Gad, P. et al. Development of a multi-electrode array for spinal cord epidural stimulation to facilitate stepping and standing after a complete spinal cord injury in adult rats. J. Neuroeng. Rehabil. 10, 2 (2013).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 15.

    Gad, P. et al. Electrophysiological biomarkers of neuromodulatory strategies to recover motor function after spinal cord injury. J. Neurophysiol. 113, 3386–3396 (2015).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 16.

    van den Brand, R. et al. Restoring voluntary control of locomotion after paralyzing spinal cord injury. Science 336, 1182–1185 (2012).

    PubMed 
    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • 17.

    Wenger, N. et al. Closed-loop neuromodulation of spinal sensorimotor circuits controls refined locomotion after complete spinal cord injury. Sci. Transl. Med. 6, 255ra133–255ra133 (2014).

    PubMed 
    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 18.

    Edgerton, V. R. et al. Training locomotor networks. Brain Res. Rev. 57, 241–254 (2008).

    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 19.

    Edgerton, V. R. & Roy, R. R. Activity-dependent plasticity of spinal locomotion: implications for sensory processing. Exerc. Sport Sci. Rev. 37, 171–178 (2009).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 20.

    De Leon, R., Hodgson, J., Roy, R. & Edgerton, V. R. Locomotor capacity attributable to step training versus spontaneous recovery after spinalization in adult cats. J. Neurophysiol. 79, 1329–1340 (1998).

    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 21.

    Ichiyama, R. M. et al. Step training reinforces specific spinal locomotor circuitry in adult spinal rats. J. Neurosci. 28, 7370–7375 (2008).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 22.

    Wenger, N. et al. Spatiotemporal neuromodulation therapies engaging muscle synergies improve motor control after spinal cord injury. Nat. Med. 22, 138 (2016).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 23.

    Shah, P. K. et al. Variability in step training enhances locomotor recovery after a spinal cord injury. Eur. J. Neurosci. 36, 2054–2062 (2012).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 24.

    Asboth, L. et al. Cortico–reticulo–spinal circuit reorganization enables functional recovery after severe spinal cord contusion. Nat. Neurosci. 21, 576–588 (2018).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 25.

    Krupa, P. et al. The translesional spinal network and its reorganization after spinal cord injury. Neuroscientist 22, 1073858420966276 (2020).

  • 26.

    Marchand, R., Woerly, S., Bertrand, L. & Valdes, N. Evaluation of two cross-linked collagen gels implanted in the transected spinal cord. Brain Res. Bull. 30, 415–422 (1993).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 27.

    Chen, B. K. et al. Comparison of polymer scaffolds in rat spinal cord: a step toward quantitative assessment of combinatorial approaches to spinal cord repair. Biomaterials 32, 8077–8086 (2011).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 28.

    Gupta, D., Tator, C. H. & Shoichet, M. S. Fast-gelling injectable blend of hyaluronan and methylcellulose for intrathecal, localized delivery to the injured spinal cord. Biomaterials 27, 2370–2379 (2006).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 29.

    Guo, J. et al. Reknitting the injured spinal cord by self-assembling peptide nanofiber scaffold. Nanomedicine 3, 311–321 (2007).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 30.

    Donaghue, I. E., Tam, R., Sefton, M. V. & Shoichet, M. S. Cell and biomolecule delivery for tissue repair and regeneration in the central nervous system. J. Control. Release 190, 219–227 (2014).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • 31.

    Madigan, N. N. et al. Comparison of cellular architecture, axonal growth, and blood vessel formation through cell-loaded polymer scaffolds in the transected rat spinal cord. Tissue Eng. Part A 20, 2985–2997 (2014).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 32.

    De Laporte, L., Yan, A. L. & Shea, L. D. Local gene delivery from ECM-coated poly(lactide-co-glycolide) multiple channel bridges after spinal cord injury. Biomaterials 30, 2361–2368 (2009).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • 33.

    Koffler, J. et al. Biomimetic 3D-printed scaffolds for spinal cord injury repair. Nat. Med. 25, 263 (2019).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 34.

    Haggerty, A. E., Maldonado-Lasunción, I. & Oudega, M. Biomaterials for revascularization and immunomodulation after spinal cord injury. Biomed. Mater. 13, 044105 (2018).

    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 35.

    Rao, J.-S. et al. NT3-chitosan enables de novo regeneration and functional recovery in monkeys after spinal cord injury. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 115, E5595–E5604 (2018).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 36.

    Xu, X. M., Guénard, V., Kleitman, N., Aebischer, P. & Bunge, M. B. A combination of BDNF and NT-3 promotes supraspinal axonal regeneration into Schwann cell grafts in adult rat thoracic spinal cord. Exp. Neurol. 134, 261–272 (1995).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 37.

    Dadsetan, M., Knight, A. M., Lu, L., Windebank, A. J. & Yaszemski, M. J. Stimulation of neurite outgrowth using positively charged hydrogels. Biomaterials 30, 3874–3881 (2009).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 38.

    Chen, B. K. et al. GDNF Schwann cells in hydrogel scaffolds promote regional axon regeneration, remyelination and functional improvement after spinal cord transection in rats. J. Tissue Eng. Regen. Med. 12, e398–e407 (2018).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 39.

    Hakim, J. S. et al. Combinatorial tissue engineering partially restores function after spinal cord injury. J. Tissue Eng. Regen. Med. 13, 857–873 (2019).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 40.

    Shah, P. K. & Lavrov, I. Spinal epidural stimulation strategies: clinical implications of locomotor studies in spinal rats. Neuroscientist 23, 664–680 (2017).

    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 41.

    Islamov, R. R. et al. A pilot study of cell-mediated gene therapy for spinal cord injury in mini pigs. Neurosci. Lett. 644, 67–75 (2017).

    PubMed 
    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • 42.

    Izmailov, A. A. et al. Spinal cord molecular and cellular changes induced by adenoviral vector-and cell-mediated triple gene therapy after severe contusion. Front. Pharmacol. 8, 813 (2017).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • 43.

    Mukhamedshina, Y. et al. Mesenchymal stem cell therapy for spinal cord contusion: a comparative study on small and large animal models. Biomolecules 9, 811 (2019).

    CAS 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • 44.

    Mikhaylov, A. et al. Neurohybrid memristive CMOS-integrated systems for biosensors and neuroprosthetics. Front. Neurosci. 14, 358 (2020).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 45.

    Zhao, Y. et al. Clinical study of neuroRegen scaffold combined with human mesenchymal stem cells for the repair of chronic complete spinal cord injury. Cell Transplant. 26, 891–900 (2017).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 46.

    Madigan, N. N. et al. Axonal regeneration supported by neurotrophic Schwann cells and mesenchymal stem cells through polymer scaffolds in the transected rat spinal cord. Society for Neuroscience, Program No. 365.2/CC71, Chicago, IL (2009).

  • 47.

    Olson, H. E. et al. Neural stem cell- and schwann cell-loaded biodegradable polymer scaffolds support axonal regeneration in the transected spinal cord. Tissue Eng. Part A 15, 1797–1805 (2009).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 48.

    Badner, A., Siddiqui, A. M. & Fehlings, M. G. Spinal cord injuries: how could cell therapy help? Expert Opin. Biol. Ther. 17, 529–541 (2017).

    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 49.

    Oh, S. K. et al. A Phase III clinical trial showing limited efficacy of autologous mesenchymal stem cell therapy for spinal cord injury. Neurosurgery 78, 436–447 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 50.

    Lu, P. et al. Long-distance growth and connectivity of neural stem cells after severe spinal cord injury. Cell 150, 1264–1273 (2012).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 51.

    Hutson, T. H. & Di Giovanni, S. The translational landscape in spinal cord injury: focus on neuroplasticity and regeneration. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 15, 732–745 (2019).

    PubMed 
    Article 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 52.

    Gill, M. L. et al. Neuromodulation of lumbosacral spinal networks enables independent stepping after complete paraplegia. Nat. Med. 24, 1677–1682 (2018).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 53.

    Angeli, C. A., Edgerton, V. R., Gerasimenko, Y. P. & Harkema, S. J. Altering spinal cord excitability enables voluntary movements after chronic complete paralysis in humans. Brain 137, 1394–1409 (2014).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 54.

    Sayenko, D. G., Angeli, C., Harkema, S. J., Edgerton, V. R. & Gerasimenko, Y. P. Neuromodulation of evoked muscle potentials induced by epidural spinal-cord stimulation in paralyzed individuals. J. Neurophysiol. 111, 1088–1099 (2014).

    PubMed 
    Article 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 55.

    Daly, W. T. et al. Comparison and characterization of multiple biomaterial conduits for peripheral nerve repair. Biomaterials 34, 8630–8639 (2013).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 56.

    Hakim, J. S. et al. Positively charged oligo[poly(ethylene glycol) fumarate] scaffold implantation results in a permissive lesion environment after spinal cord injury in rat. Tissue Eng. Part A 21, 2099–2114 (2015).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 57.

    Chen, B. K. et al. GDNF Schwann cells in hydrogel scaffolds promote regional axon regeneration, remyelination and functional improvement after spinal cord transection in rats. J. Tissue Eng. Regen. Med. https://doi.org/10.1002/term.2431 (2017).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 58.

    Siddiqui, A. M. et al. Defining spatial relationships between spinal cord axons and blood vessels in hydrogel scaffolds. Tissue Eng. Part A https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.TEA.2020.0316 (2021).

  • 59.

    Morice, M. C. et al. A randomized comparison of a sirolimus-eluting stent with a standard stent for coronary revascularization. N. Engl. J. Med. 346, 1773–1780 (2002).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 60.

    Moses, J. W. et al. Sirolimus-eluting stents versus standard stents in patients with stenosis in a native coronary artery. N. Engl. J. Med. 349, 1315–1323 (2003).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 61.

    Tateda, S. et al. Rapamycin suppresses microglial activation and reduces the development of neuropathic pain after spinal cord injury. J. Orthop. Res. 35, 93–103 (2017).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 62.

    Takami, T. et al. Schwann cell but not olfactory ensheathing glia transplants improve hindlimb locomotor performance in the moderately contused adult rat thoracic spinal cord. J. Neurosci. 22, 6670–6681 (2002).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 63.

    Fortun, J., Hill, C. E. & Bunge, M. B. Combinatorial strategies with Schwann cell transplantation to improve repair of the injured spinal cord. Neurosci. Lett. 456, 124–132 (2009).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 64.

    Kanno, H. et al. Combination of engineered Schwann cell grafts to secrete neurotrophin and chondroitinase promotes axonal regeneration and locomotion after spinal cord injury. J. Neurosci. 34, 1838–1855 (2014).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 65.

    Henderson, C. E. et al. GDNF—a potent survival factor for motoneurons present in peripheral nerve and muscle. Science 266, 1062–1064 (1994).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 66.

    Munson, J. B. & McMahon, S. B. Effects of GDNF on axotomized sensory and motor neurons in adult rats. Eur. J. Neurosci. 9, 1126–1129 (1997).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 67.

    Iannotti, C. et al. A neuroprotective role of glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor following moderate spinal cord contusion injury. Exp. Neurol. 189, 317–332 (2004).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 68.

    Moore, A. M. et al. Controlled delivery of glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor enhances motor nerve regeneration. J. Hand Surg. Am. 35, 2008–2017 (2010).

    PubMed 
    Article 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 69.

    Gerasimenko, I., Avelev, V., Nikitin, O. & Lavrov, I. Initiation of locomotor activity in spinalized cats by epidural stimulation of the spinal cord. Rossiiskii fiziologicheskii Zhumal imeni IM Sechenova 87, 1161–1170 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  • 70.

    Cuellar, C. A. et al. The role of functional neuroanatomy of the lumbar spinal cord in effect of epidural stimulation. Front. Neuroanat. 11, 82 (2017).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 71.

    Lavrov, I. et al. Activation of spinal locomotor circuits in the decerebrated cat by spinal epidural and/or intraspinal electrical stimulation. Brain Res. 1600, 84–92 (2015).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 72.

    Lavrov, I. et al. Integrating multiple sensory systems to modulate neural networks controlling posture. J. Neurophysiol. 114, 3306–3314 (2015).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 73.

    Lavrov, I. et al. Plasticity of spinal cord reflexes after a complete transection in adult rats: relationship to stepping ability. J. Neurophysiol. 96, 1699–1710 (2006).

    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 74.

    David, S. & Aguayo, A. J. Axonal elongation into peripheral nervous system bridges after central nervous system injury in adult rats. Science 241, 931–933 (1981).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 75.

    Friedman, J. A. et al. Biodegradable polymer grafts for surgical repair of the injured spinal cord. Neurosurgery 51, 742–752 (2002).

    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 76.

    Bakshi, A. et al. Mechanically engineered hydrogel scaffolds for axonal growth and angiogenesis after transplantation in spinal cord injury. J. Neurosurg. Spine 1, 322–329 (2004).

    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 77.

    Chen, B. K. et al. Axon regeneration through scaffold into distal spinal cord after transection. J. Neurotrauma 26, 1759–1771 (2009).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 78.

    Hurtado, A. et al. Poly (d,l-lactic acid) macroporous guidance scaffolds seeded with Schwann cells genetically modified to secrete a bi-functional neurotrophin implanted in the completely transected adult rat thoracic spinal cord. Biomaterials 27, 430–442 (2006).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 79.

    Novikova, L. N., Pettersson, J., Brohlin, M., Wiberg, M. & Novikov, L. N. Biodegradable poly-beta-hydroxybutyrate scaffold seeded with Schwann cells to promote spinal cord repair. Biomaterials 29, 1198–1206 (2008).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 80.

    Prang, P. et al. The promotion of oriented axonal regrowth in the injured spinal cord by alginate-based anisotropic capillary hydrogels. Biomaterials 27, 3560–3569 (2006).

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • 81.

    Rossi, S. et al. Interleukin‐1β causes synaptic hyperexcitability in multiple sclerosis. Ann. Neurol. 71, 76–83 (2012).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 82.

    Medelin, M. et al. Bridging pro-inflammatory signals, synaptic transmission and protection in spinal explants in vitro. Mol. brain 11, 3–3 (2018).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 83.

    Bradbury, E. J. et al. Chondroitinase ABC promotes functional recovery after spinal cord injury. Nature 416, 636–640 (2002).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 84.

    Silver, J., Schwab, M. E. & Popovich, P. G. Central nervous system regenerative failure: role of oligodendrocytes, astrocytes, and microglia. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 7, a020602–a020602 (2014).

    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 85.

    Park, K. K. et al. Promoting axon regeneration in the adult CNS by modulation of the PTEN/mTOR pathway. Science 322, 963–966 (2008).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 86.

    Abe, N., Borson, S. H., Gambello, M. J., Wang, F. & Cavalli, V. Mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) activation increases axonal growth capacity of injured peripheral nerves. J. Biol. Chem. 285, 28034–28043 (2010).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 87.

    Goldshmit, Y. et al. Rapamycin increases neuronal survival, reduces inflammation and astrocyte proliferation after spinal cord injury. Mol. Cell Neurosci. 68, 82–91 (2015).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 88.

    Sekiguchi, A., Kanno, H., Ozawa, H., Yamaya, S. & Itoi, E. Rapamycin promotes autophagy and reduces neural tissue damage and locomotor impairment after spinal cord injury in mice. J. Neurotraum. 29, 946–956 (2012).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 89.

    Li, Q. et al. Rapamycin enhances mitophagy and attenuates apoptosis after spinal ischemia-reperfusion injury. Front. Neurosci. 12, 865 (2018).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 90.

    Metz, G. A., Merkler, D., Dietz, V., Schwab, M. E. & Fouad, K. Efficient testing of motor function in spinal cord injured rats. Brain Res. 883, 165–177 (2000).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 91.

    Couto, P. A. et al. A comparison of two-dimensional and three-dimensional techniques for the determination of hindlimb kinematics during treadmill locomotion in rats following spinal cord injury. J. Neurosci. Methods 173, 193–200 (2008).

    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 92.

    Islam, R. et al. Multifactorial motor behavior assessment for real-time evaluation of emerging therapeutics to treat neurologic impairments. Sci. Rep. 9, 1–16 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  • 93.

    Basso, D. M., Beattie, M. S. & Bresnahan, J. C. A sensitive and reliable locomotor rating scale for open field testing in rats. J. Neurotrauma 12, 1–21 (1995).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 94.

    Basso, D. M., Beattie, M. S. & Bresnahan, J. C. Graded histological and locomotor outcomes after spinal cord contusion using the NYU weight-drop device versus transection. Exp. Neurol. 139, 244–256 (1996).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 95.

    Agrawal, G., Thakor, N. V. & All, A. H. Evoked potential versus behavior to detect minor insult to the spinal cord in a rat model. J. Clin. Neurosci. 16, 1052–1055 (2009).

    PubMed 
    Article 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 96.

    All, A. H. et al. Evoked potential and behavioral outcomes for experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis in Lewis rats. Neurol. Sci. 31, 595–601 (2010).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 97.

    Thota, A. K., Watson, S. C., Knapp, E., Thompson, B. & Jung, R. Neuromechanical control of locomotion in the rat. J. Neurotrauma 22, 442–465 (2005).

    PubMed 
    Article 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 98.

    Alluin, O. et al. Examination of the combined effects of chondroitinase ABC, growth factors and locomotor training following compressive spinal cord injury on neuroanatomical plasticity and kinematics. PLoS ONE 9, e111072 (2014).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • 99.

    Harkema, S. J. Neural plasticity after human spinal cord injury: application of locomotor training to the rehabilitation of walking. Neuroscientist 7, 455–468 (2001).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 100.

    McCREA, D. A. Neuronal basis of afferent-evoked enhancement of locomotor activity. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 860, 216–225 (1998).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 101.

    Burke, R. The use of state-dependent modulation of spinal reflexes as a tool to investigate the organization of spinal interneurons. Exp. Brain Res. 128, 263–277 (1999).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 102.

    Kiehn, O. Decoding the organization of spinal circuits that control locomotion. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 17, 224 (2016).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 103.

    Côté, M.-P., Murray, L. M. & Knikou, M. Spinal control of locomotion: individual neurons, their circuits and functions. Front. Physiol. 9, 784 (2018).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 104.

    Roy, R. R., Hutchison, D. L., Pierotti, D. J., Hodgson, J. A. & Edgerton, V. R. EMG patterns of rat ankle extensors and flexors during treadmill locomotion and swimming. J. Appl. Physiol. 70, 2522–2529 (1991).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 105.

    Rooney, G. E. et al. Sustained delivery of dibutyryl cyclic adenosine monophosphate to the transected spinal cord via oligo [(polyethylene glycol) fumarate] hydrogels. Tissue Eng. Part A 17, 1287–1302 (2011).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 106.

    Rui, J. et al. Controlled release of vascular endothelial growth factor using poly-lactic-co-glycolic acid microspheres: In vitro characterization and application in polycaprolactone fumarate nerve conduits. Acta Biomater. 8, 511–518 (2012).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 107.

    Chen, B. K. et al. Comparison of polymer scaffolds in rat spinal cord: a step toward quantitative assessment of combinatorial approaches to spinal cord repair. Biomaterials 32, 8077–8086 (2011).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 108.

    Madigan, N. N. et al. Comparison of cellular architecture, axonal growth,and blood vessel formation through cell-loaded polymer scaffolds in the transected rat spinal cord. Tissue Eng. Part A 20, 2985–2997 (2013).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • 109.

    Bankhead, P. et al. QuPath: open source software for digital pathology image analysis. Sci. Rep. 7, 1–7 (2017).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Source link