Preloader

Intensive production of the harpacticoid copepod Tigriopus californicus in a zero-effluent ‘green water’ bioreactor

  • 1.

    FAO. The state of world fisheries and aquaculture 2020. Sustainability in action. (Rome, 2020).

  • 2.

    FAO. The state of world fisheries and aquaculture 2018: Meeting the sustainable development goals. (Rome, 2018).

  • 3.

    Fiorella, K. J., Okronipa, H., Baker, K. & Heilpern, S. Contemporary aquaculture: implications for human nutrition. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 70, 83–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2020.11.014 (2021).

    CAS 
    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • 4.

    Shannon, L. & Waller, L. A cursory look at the fishmeal/oil industry from an ecosystem perspective. Front. Ecol. Evol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2021.645023 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 5.

    Cottrell, R. S., Blanchard, J. L., Halpern, B. S., Metian, M. & Froehlich, H. E. Global adoption of novel aquaculture feeds could substantially reduce forage fish demand by 2030. Nat. Food 1, 301–308. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43016-020-0078-x (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 6.

    Naylor, R. L. et al. A 20-year retrospective review of global aquaculture. Nature 591, 551–563. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03308-6 (2021).

    ADS 
    CAS 
    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • 7.

    Luthada-Raswiswi, R., Mukaratirwa, S. & O’Brien, G. Animal protein sources as a substitute for fishmeal in aquaculture diets: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Appl. Sci. 11, 3854. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11093854 (2021).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 8.

    van Huis, A. Insects as food and feed, a new emerging agricultural sector: a review. J. Insects Food Feed 6, 27–44. https://doi.org/10.3920/jiff2019.0017 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 9.

    Osmond, A. T. Y. et al. Transgenic camelina oil is an effective source of eicosapentaenoic acid and docosahexaenoic acid in diets for farmed rainbow trout, in terms of growth, tissue fatty acid content, and fillet sensory properties. J. World Aquacult. Soc. 52, 961–986. https://doi.org/10.1111/jwas.12788 (2021).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 10.

    Wan, A. H. L., Davies, S. J., Soler-Vila, A., Fitzgerald, R. & Johnson, M. P. Macroalgae as a sustainable aquafeed ingredient. Rev. Aquacult. 11, 458–492. https://doi.org/10.1111/raq.12241 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 11.

    Yarnold, J., Karan, H., Oey, M. & Hankamer, B. Microalgal aquafeeds as part of a circular bioeconomy. Trends Plant Sci. 24, 959–970. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2019.06.005 (2019).

    CAS 
    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • 12.

    Agboola, J. O., Øverland, M., Skrede, A. & Hansen, J. Ø. Yeast as major protein-rich ingredient in aquafeeds: a review of the implications for aquaculture production. Rev. Aquacult. 13, 949–970. https://doi.org/10.1111/raq.12507 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 13.

    Nevejan, N. et al. Bacteria as food in aquaculture: do they make a difference?. Rev. Aquacult. 10, 180–212. https://doi.org/10.1111/raq.12155 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 14.

    Sánchez-Muros, M. J., Renteria, P., Vizcaino, A. & Barroso, F. G. Innovative protein sources in shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei) feeding. Rev. Aquacult. 12, 186–203. https://doi.org/10.1111/raq.12312 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 15.

    Tran, H. Q., Van Doan, H. & Stejskal, V. Environmental consequences of using insect meal as an ingredient in aquafeeds: A systematic view. Rev. Aquacult. https://doi.org/10.1111/raq.12595 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 16.

    Bazoche, P. & Poret, S. Acceptability of insects in animal feed: A survey of French consumers. J. Consum. Behav. 20, 251–270. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.1845 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 17.

    Van Stappen, G. et al. Review on integrated production of the brine shrimp Artemia in solar salt ponds. Rev. Aquacult. 12, 1054–1071. https://doi.org/10.1111/raq.12371 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 18.

    Fukusho, K. Mass production of a copepod, Tigriopus japonicus in combination culture with a rotifer Brachionus plicatilis, fed omega-yeast as a food source. Bull. Jpn. Soc. Sci. Fish. 46, 625–629. https://doi.org/10.2331/suisan.46.625 (1980).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 19.

    Sarkisian, B. L., Lemus, J. T., Apeitos, A., Blaylock, R. B. & Saillant, E. A. An intensive, large-scale batch culture system to produce the calanoid copepod, Acartia tonsa. Aquaculture 501, 272–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2018.11.042 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 20.

    Lavens, P. & Sorgeloos, P. Design, operation, and potential of a culture system for the continuous production of Artemia nauplii. Vol. 3 (Universa Press, 1987).

  • 21.

    Sun, B. & Fleeger, J. W. Sustained mass culture of Amphiascoides atopus a marine harpacticoid copepod in a recirculating system. Aquaculture 136, 313–321. https://doi.org/10.1016/0044-8486(95)01064-5 (1995).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 22.

    Drillet, G. et al. Status and recommendations on marine copepod cultivation for use as live feed. Aquaculture 315, 155–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2011.02.027 (2011).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 23.

    Neori, A. “Green water” microalgae: the leading sector in world aquaculture. J. Appl. Phycol. 23, 143–149. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10811-010-9531-9 (2011).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 24.

    Alonso, M., Lago, F. C., Vieites, J. M. & Espiñeira, M. Molecular characterization of microalgae used in aquaculture with biotechnology potential. Aquacult. Int. 20, 847–857. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10499-012-9506-8 (2012).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 25.

    Pereira, H. et al. Scale-up and large-scale production of Tetraselmis sp. CTP4 (Chlorophyta) for CO2 mitigation: from an agar plate to 100-m3 industrial photobioreactors. Sci. Rep. 8, 5112. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-23340-3 (2018).

    ADS 
    CAS 
    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 26.

    Farahin, A. W. et al. Tolerance of Tetraselmis tetrathele to high ammonium nitrogen and its effect on growth rate, carotenoid, and fatty acids productivity. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2021.568776 (2021).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 27.

    Schulze, P. S. C. et al. Urban wastewater treatment by Tetraselmis sp. CTP4 (Chlorophyta). Bioresour. Technol. 223, 175–183. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.10.027 (2017).

  • 28.

    Das, P. et al. Long-term semi-continuous cultivation of a halo-tolerant Tetraselmis sp. using recycled growth media. Bioresour. Technol. 276, 35–41. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2018.12.108 (2019).

  • 29.

    Fon Sing, S., Isdepsky, A., Borowitzka, M. A. & Lewis, D. M. Pilot-scale continuous recycling of growth medium for the mass culture of a halotolerant Tetraselmis sp. in raceway ponds under increasing salinity: A novel protocol for commercial microalgal biomass production. Bioresour. Technol. 161, 47–54. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2014.03.010 (2014).

  • 30.

    Hagiwara, A. et al. Production and use of two marine zooplanktons, Tigriopus japonicus and Diaphanosoma celebensis, as live food for red sea bream Pagrus major larvae. Fish. Sci. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12562-016-1005-9 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 31.

    Lee, C.-S., Hu, F. & Hirano, R. Organisms suitable as food for larvae of black sea bream. Prog. Fish-Cult. 43, 121–124. https://doi.org/10.1577/1548-8659(1981)43[121:OSAFFL]2.0.CO;2 (1981).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 32.

    Tseng, W.-Y. & Hsu, C.-K. Studies on the culture of the marine copepod Tigriopus japonicus mori and its value as a food for juveniles of the yellow-fin sea bream Acanthopagrus latus (houttuyn). Crustaceana Supplement, 381–389 (1984).

  • 33.

    Kabeya, N. et al. A complete enzymatic capacity for biosynthesis of docosahexaenoic acid (DHA, 22:6n3) exists in the marine Harpacticoida copepod Tigriopus californicus. Open Biol. 11, 200402. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsob.200402 (2021).

    CAS 
    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 34.

    Weaver, R. J., Cobine, P. A. & Hill, G. E. On the bioconversion of dietary carotenoids to astaxanthin in the marine copepod, Tigriopus californicus. J. Plank. Res. 40, 142–150. https://doi.org/10.1093/plankt/fbx072 (2018).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 35.

    Prado-Cabrero, A., Saefurahman, G. & Nolan, J. M. Stereochemistry of astaxanthin biosynthesis in the marine harpacticoid copepod Tigriopus californicus. Mar. Drugs 18, 506. https://doi.org/10.3390/md18100506 (2020).

    CAS 
    Article 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 36.

    Damgaard, R. M. & Davenport, J. Salinity tolerance, salinity preference and temperature tolerance in the high-shore harpacticoid copepod Tigriopus brevicornis. Mar. Biol. 118, 443–449. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00350301 (1994).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 37.

    Jones, D. B. Factors for converting percentages of nitrogen in foods and feeds into percentages of proteins (1931).

  • 38.

    Mariotti, F., Tomé, D. & Mirand, P. P. Converting nitrogen into protein: beyond 6.25 and Jones’ factors. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 48, 177–184. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10408390701279749 (2008).

  • 39.

    Oser, B. L. Method for integrating essential amino acid content in the nutritional evaluation of protein. J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 27, 396–402 (1951).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 40.

    Egerton, S. et al. Replacing fishmeal with plant protein in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) diets by supplementation with fish protein hydrolysate. Sci. Rep. 10, 4194. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-60325-7 (2020).

    ADS 
    CAS 
    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 41.

    Colombo-Hixson, S. M., Olsen, R. E., Tibbetts, S. M. & Lall, S. P. Evaluation of Calanus finmarchicus copepod meal in practical diets for juvenile Atlantic halibut (Hippoglossus hippoglossus). Aquacult. Nut. 19, 687–700. https://doi.org/10.1111/anu.12016 (2013).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 42.

    Lu, Z. et al. Water reuse for sustainable microalgae cultivation: current knowledge and future directions. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 161, 104975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104975 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 43.

    Harris, R. P. Feeding, growth, reproduction and nitrogen utilization by the harpacticoid copepod, Tigriopus Brevicornis. J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. UK 53, 785–800. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025315400022475 (1973).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 44.

    Pereira, H. et al. Isolation of a euryhaline microalgal strain, Tetraselmis sp. CTP4, as a robust feedstock for biodiesel production. Sci. Rep. 6, 35663. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/srep35663 (2016).

  • 45.

    Spaeth, M., Powlik, J. J. & Lewis, A. G. Development, body length, and feeding of Tigriopus californicus (copepoda, harpacticoida) in laboratory and field populations. Crustaceana 70, 324–343. https://doi.org/10.1163/156854097X00609 (1997).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 46.

    Kahan, D., Berman, Y. & Bar-El, T. Maternal inhibition of hatching at high population densities in Tigriopus japonicus (copepoda, crustacea). Biol. Bull. 174, 139–144. https://doi.org/10.2307/1541780 (1988).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 47.

    Lim, K. C., Yusoff, F. M., Shariff, M. & Kamarudin, M. S. Astaxanthin as feed supplement in aquatic animals. Rev. Aquacult. 10, 738–773. https://doi.org/10.1111/raq.12200 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 48.

    Prado-Cabrero, A. & Nolan, J. M. Omega-3 nutraceuticals, climate change and threats to the environment: The cases of Antarctic krill and Calanus finmarchicus. Ambio 50, 1184–1199. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-020-01472-z (2021).

    CAS 
    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 49.

    Watters, G. M., Hinke, J. T. & Reiss, C. S. Long-term observations from Antarctica demonstrate that mismatched scales of fisheries management and predator-prey interaction lead to erroneous conclusions about precaution. Sci. Rep. 10, 2314. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-59223-9 (2020).

    ADS 
    CAS 
    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 50.

    Raisuddin, S., Kwok, K. W. H., Leung, K. M. Y., Schlenk, D. & Lee, J.-S. The copepod Tigriopus: A promising marine model organism for ecotoxicology and environmental genomics. Aquat. Toxicol. 83, 161–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquatox.2007.04.005 (2007).

    CAS 
    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • 51.

    Tarrant, A. M., Nilsson, B. & Hansen, B. W. Molecular physiology of copepods: from biomarkers to transcriptomes and back again. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. D Genom. Proteom. 30, 230–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbd.2019.03.005 (2019).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 52.

    Barreto, F. S., Schoville, S. D. & Burton, R. S. Reverse genetics in the tide pool: knock-down of target gene expression via RNA interference in the copepod Tigriopus californicus. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 15, 868–879. https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.12359 (2015).

    CAS 
    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • 53.

    Noor, M. A. F. & Feder, J. L. Speciation genetics: evolving approaches. Nat. Rev. Genet. 7, 851–861. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg1968 (2006).

    CAS 
    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • 54.

    Healy, T. M. & Burton, R. S. Strong selective effects of mitochondrial DNA on the nuclear genome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 117, 6616. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1910141117 (2020).

    CAS 
    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 55.

    Erbland, P., Caron, S., Peterson, M. & Alyokhin, A. Design and performance of a low-cost, automated, large-scale photobioreactor for microalgae production. Aquacult. Eng. 90, 102103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaeng.2020.102103 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 56.

    Provasoli, L., Shiraishi, K. & Lance, J. Nutritional idiosyncrasies of Artemia and Tigriopus in monoxenic culture. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 77, 250–261. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1959.tb36905.x (1959).

    ADS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 57.

    Kim, H.-J., Yamade, T., Iwasaki, K., Marcial, H. S. & Hagiwara, A. Phototactic behavior of the marine harpacticoid copepod Tigriopus japonicus related to developmental stages under various light conditions. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 518, 151183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2019.151183 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 58.

    Brown, L. et al. Aquatic invertebrate protein sources for long-duration space travel. Life Sci. Space Res. 28, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lssr.2020.10.002 (2021).

    ADS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 59.

    Guillard, R. R. L. & Ryther, J. H. Studies of marine planktonic diatoms: I. Cyclotella nana Hustedt, and Detonula confervacea (Cleve) Gran. Can. J. Microbiol. 8, 229–239. doi:https://doi.org/10.1139/m62-029 (1962).

  • 60.

    Ribeiro Rodrigues, L., Arenzon, A., Raya-Rodriguez, M. & Fontoura, N. Algal density assessed by spectrophotometry: A calibration curve for the unicellular algae Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata. J. Environ. Chem. Ecotoxicol. 3. doi:https://doi.org/10.5897/JECE2011.025 (2011).

  • 61.

    Withers, N. W., Cox, E. R., Tomas, R. & Haxo, F. T. Pigments of the dinoflagellate Peridinium balticum and its photosynthetic endosymbiont. J. Phycol. 13, 354–358. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1529-8817.1977.tb02941.x (1977).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 62.

    Zwart, S. R., Mulavara, A. P., Williams, T. J., George, K. & Smith, S. M. The role of nutrition in space exploration: Implications for sensorimotor, cognition, behavior and the cerebral changes due to the exposure to radiation, altered gravity, and isolation/confinement hazards of spaceflight. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 127, 307–331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.04.026 (2021).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Source link