Preloader

Genome-edited powdery mildew resistance in wheat without growth penalties

  • 1.

    van Schie, C. C. & Takken, F. L. Susceptibility genes 101: how to be a good host. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 52, 551–581 (2014).

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • 2.

    Schulze-Lefert, P. & Vogel, J. Closing the ranks to attack by powdery mildew. Trends Plant Sci. 5, 343–348 (2000).

    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • 3.

    Büschges, R. et al. The barley Mlo gene: a novel control element of plant pathogen resistance. Cell 88, 695–705 (1997).

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • 4.

    Consonni, C. et al. Conserved requirement for a plant host cell protein in powdery mildew pathogenesis. Nat. Genet. 38, 716–720 (2006).

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • 5.

    van Esse, H. P., Reuber, T. L. & van der Does, D. Genetic modification to improve disease resistance in crops. New Phytol. 225, 70–86 (2020).

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • 6.

    Li, W., Deng, Y., Ning, Y., He, Z. & Wang, G.-L. Exploiting broad-spectrum disease resistance in crops: from molecular dissection to breeding. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 71, 575–603 (2020).

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • 7.

    Dangl, J. L., Horvath, D. M. & Staskawicz, B. J. Pivoting the plant immune system from dissection to deployment. Science 341, 746–751 (2013).

    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • 8.

    Deng, Y. et al. Epigenetic regulation of antagonistic receptors confers rice blast resistance with yield balance. Science 355, 962–965 (2017).

    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • 9.

    Saintenac, C. et al. Wheat receptor-kinase-like protein Stb6 controls gene-for-gene resistance to fungal pathogen Zymoseptoria tritici. Nat. Genet. 50, 368–374 (2018).

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • 10.

    Jones, J. D. & Dangl, J. L. The plant immune system. Nature 444, 323–329 (2006).

    ADS 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • 11.

    Dangl, J. L. & Jones, J. D. Plant pathogens and integrated defence responses to infection. Nature 411, 826–833 (2001).

    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • 12.

    Dodds, P. N. & Rathjen, J. P. Plant immunity: towards an integrated view of plant–pathogen interactions. Nat. Rev. Genet. 11, 539–548 (2010).

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • 13.

    Oliva, R. et al. Broad-spectrum resistance to bacterial blight in rice using genome editing. Nat. Biotechnol. 37, 1344–1350 (2019).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 14.

    Lapin, D. & Van den Ackerveken, G. Susceptibility to plant disease: more than a failure of host immunity. Trends Plant Sci. 18, 546–554 (2013).

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • 15.

    Vogel, J. P., Raab, T. K., Schiff, C. & Somerville, S. C. PMR6, a pectate lyase–like gene required for powdery mildew susceptibility in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 14, 2095–2106 (2002).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 16.

    Eckardt, N. A. Plant disease susceptibility genes? Plant Cell 14, 1983–1986 (2002).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 17.

    Kim, M. C. et al. Calmodulin interacts with MLO protein to regulate defence against mildew in barley. Nature 416, 447–451 (2002).

    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • 18.

    Devoto, A. et al. Topology, subcellular localization, and sequence diversity of the Mlo family in plants. J. Biol. Chem. 274, 34993–35004 (1999).

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • 19.

    Kusch, S. & Panstruga, R. mlo-based resistance: an apparently universal “weapon” to defeat powdery mildew disease. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 30, 179–189 (2017).

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • 20.

    Wang, Y. et al. Simultaneous editing of three homoeoalleles in hexaploid bread wheat confers heritable resistance to powdery mildew. Nat. Biotechnol. 32, 947–951 (2014).

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • 21.

    Bai, Y. et al. Naturally occurring broad-spectrum powdery mildew resistance in a Central American tomato accession is caused by loss of Mlo function. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 21, 30–39 (2008).

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • 22.

    Humphry, M., Consonni, C. & Panstruga, R. mlo-based powdery mildew immunity: silver bullet or simply non-host resistance? Mol. Plant Pathol. 7, 605–610 (2006).

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • 23.

    Piffanelli, P. et al. A barley cultivation-associated polymorphism conveys resistance to powdery mildew. Nature 430, 887–891 (2004).

    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • 24.

    Acevedo-Garcia, J., Kusch, S. & Panstruga, R. Magical mystery tour: MLO proteins in plant immunity and beyond. New Phytol. 204, 273–281 (2014).

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • 25.

    Appiano, M. et al. Monocot and dicot MLO powdery mildew susceptibility factors are functionally conserved in spite of the evolution of class-specific molecular features. BMC Plant Biol. 15, 257 (2015).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 26.

    Singh, R. P. et al. Disease impact on wheat yield potential and prospects of genetic control. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 54, 303–322 (2016).

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • 27.

    Acevedo-Garcia, J. et al. mlo-based powdery mildew resistance in hexaploid bread wheat generated by a non-transgenic TILLING approach. Plant Biotechnol. J. 15, 367–378 (2017).

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • 28.

    Bogdanove, A. J. & Voytas, D. F. TAL effectors: customizable proteins for DNA targeting. Science 333, 1843–1846 (2011).

    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • 29.

    Ramírez-González, R. H. et al. The transcriptional landscape of polyploid wheat. Science 361, eaar6089 (2018).

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • 30.

    Wormit, A. et al. Molecular identification and physiological characterization of a novel monosaccharide transporter from Arabidopsis involved in vacuolar sugar transport. Plant Cell 18, 3476–3490 (2006).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 31.

    Bieluszewski, T., Xiao, J., Yang, Y. & Wagner, D. PRC2 activity, recruitment, and silencing: a comparative perspective. Trends Plant Sci. 21, S1360–S1385 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  • 32.

    Kajimura, T., Mizuno, N. & Takumi, S. Utility of leaf senescence-associated gene homologs as developmental markers in common wheat. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 48, 851–859 (2010).

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • 33.

    Consonni, C. et al. Tryptophan-derived metabolites are required for antifungal defense in the Arabidopsis mlo2 mutant. Plant Physiol. 152, 1544–1561 (2010).

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • 34.

    Gao, C. Genome engineering for crop improvement and future agriculture. Cell 184, 1621–1635 (2021).

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • 35.

    Zhang, Y. et al. Efficient and transgene-free genome editing in wheat through transient expression of CRISPR/Cas9 DNA or RNA. Nat. Commun.7, 12617–12624 (2016).

    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 36.

    Liang, Z. et al. Efficient DNA-free genome editing of bread wheat using CRISPR/Cas9 ribonucleoprotein complexes. Nat. Commun.8, 14261–14265 (2017).

    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 37.

    Jansen, M., Jarosch, B. & Schaffrath, U. The barley mutant emr1 exhibits restored resistance against Magnaporthe oryzae in the hypersusceptible mlo-genetic background. Planta 225, 1381–1391 (2007).

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • 38.

    Li, S. et al. MYB75 phosphorylation by MPK4 is required for light-induced anthocyanin accumulation in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 28, 2866–2883 (2016).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 39.

    Shan, Q. et al. Targeted genome modification of crop plants using a CRISPR–Cas system. Nat. Biotechnol. 31, 686–688 (2013).

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • 40.

    Liang, Z. et al. Genome editing of bread wheat using biolistic delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 in vitro transcripts or ribonucleoproteins. Nat. Protoc. 13, 413–430 (2018).

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • 41.

    Clough, S. J. & Bent, A. F. Floral dip: a simplified method for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 16, 735–743 (1998).

    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • 42.

    Wang, Z. et al. Genetic and physical mapping of powdery mildew resistance gene MlHLT in Chinese wheat landrace Hulutou. Theor. Appl. Genet. 128, 365–373 (2015).

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • 43.

    Shen, Q. H. et al. Nuclear activity of MLA immune receptors links isolate-specific and basal disease-resistance responses. Science 315, 1098–1103 (2007).

    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • 44.

    Li, H. & Durbin, R. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows–Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 25, 1754–1760 (2009).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 45.

    Danecek, P. et al. Twelve years of SAMtools and BCFtools. Gigascience 10, giab008 (2021).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 46.

    Thorvaldsdóttir, H., Robinson, J. T. & Mesirov, J. P. Integrative Genomics Viewer (IGV): high-performance genomics data visualization and exploration. Brief Bioinform. 14, 178–192 (2013).

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • 47.

    Kim, D., Paggi, J. M., Park, C., Bennett, C. & Salzberg, S. L. Graph-based genome alignment and genotyping with HISAT2 and HISAT-genotype. Nat. Biotechnol. 37, 907–915 (2019).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 48.

    Liao, Y., Smyth, G. K. & Shi, W. featureCounts: an efficient general purpose program for assigning sequence reads to genomic features. Bioinformatics 30, 923–930 (2014).

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • 49.

    Robinson, M. D., McCarthy, D. J. & Smyth, G. K. edgeR: a Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Bioinformatics 26, 139–140 (2010).

    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • 50.

    Weber, B., Jamge, S. & Stam, M. 3C in maize and Arabidopsis. Methods Mol. Biol. 1675, 247–270 (2018).

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • 51.

    Krijger, P. H., Geeven, G., Bianchi, V., Hilvering, C. R., & de Laat, W. 4C-seq from beginning to end: a detailed protocol for sample preparation and data analysis. Methods 170, 17–32. (2020).

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • 52.

    Ricci, W. A. et al. Widespread long-range cis-regulatory elements in the maize genome. Nat. Plants 5, 1237–1249 (2019).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 53.

    Rao, S. S. et al. A 3D map of the human genome at kilobase resolution reveals principles of chromatin looping. Cell 159, 1665–1680 (2014).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 54.

    Kim, D. & Sung, S. Vernalization-triggered intragenic chromatin-loop formation by long noncoding RNAs. Dev. Cell 40, 302–312 (2017).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 55.

    Paolacci, A. R., Tanzarella, O. A., Porceddu, E. & Ciaffi, M. Identification and validation of reference genes for quantitative RT–PCR normalization in wheat. BMC Mol. Biol. 10, 11 (2009).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 56.

    Bajic, M., Maher, K. A. & Deal, R. B. Identification of open chromatin regions in plant genomes using ATAC-seq. Methods Mol. Biol. 1675, 183–201 (2018).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 57.

    Zhang, Y. et al. Model-based analysis of ChIP-seq (MACS). Genome Biol. 9, R137 (2008).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 58.

    Ramírez, F., Dündar, F., Diehl, S., Grüning, B. A. & Manke, T. deepTools: a flexible platform for exploring deep-sequencing data. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, W187–W191 (2014).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 59.

    Kaya-Okur, H. S. et al. CUT&Tag for efficient epigenomic profiling of small samples and single cells. Nat. Commun. 10, 1930 (2019).

    ADS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 60.

    Chen, S., Zhou, Y., Chen, Y. & Gu, J. fastp: an ultra-fast all-in-one FASTQ preprocessor. Bioinformatics 34, i884–i890 (2018).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 61.

    Xiao, J. et al. Cis– and trans-determinants of epigenetic silencing by Polycomb Repressive Complex 2 in Arabidopsis. Nat. Genet. 49, 1546–1552 (2017).

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • 62.

    Gou, J. Y. et al. Wheat stripe rust resistance protein WKS1 reduces the ability of the thylakoid-associated ascorbate peroxidase to detoxify reactive oxygen species. Plant Cell 27, 1755–1770 (2015).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 63.

    Qin, D. et al. Characterization and fine mapping of a novel barley Stage Green-Revertible Albino gene (HvSGRA) by bulked segregant analysis based on ssr assay and specific length amplified fragment sequencing. BMC Genomics 16, 838–851 (2015).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 64.

    Ni, Z. et al. Altered circadian rhythms regulate growth vigour in hybrids and allopolyploids. Nature 457, 327–331 (2009).

    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Source link