Preloader

Spatial components of molecular tissue biology

  • 1.

    Okabe, Y. & Medzhitov, R. Tissue biology perspective on macrophages. Nat. Immunol. 17, 9–17 (2016).

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • 2.

    Xia, C., Fan, J., Emanuel, G., Hao, J. & Zhuang, X. Spatial transcriptome profiling by MERFISH reveals subcellular RNA compartmentalization and cell cycle-dependent gene expression. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 19490–19499 (2019).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 3.

    Eng, C.-H. L. et al. Transcriptome-scale super-resolved imaging in tissues by RNA seqFISH. Nature 568, 235–239 (2019).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 4.

    Ståhl, P. L. et al. Visualization and analysis of gene expression in tissue sections by spatial transcriptomics. Science 353, 78–82 (2016).

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • 5.

    Lin, J.-R., Fallahi-Sichani, M., Chen, J.-Y. & Sorger, P. K. Cyclic immunofluorescence (CycIF), a highly multiplexed method for single-cell imaging. Curr. Protoc. Chem. Biol. 8, 251–264 (2016).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 6.

    Giesen, C. et al. Highly multiplexed imaging of tumor tissues with subcellular resolution by mass cytometry. Nat. Methods 11, 417–422 (2014).

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • 7.

    Alexandrov, T. Spatial metabolomics and imaging mass spectrometry in the age of artificial intelligence. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Data Sci. 3, 61–87 (2020).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 8.

    Rodriques, S. G. et al. Slide-seq: A scalable technology for measuring genome-wide expression at high spatial resolution. Science 363, 1463–1467 (2019).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 9.

    Stickels, R. R. et al. Highly sensitive spatial transcriptomics at near-cellular resolution with Slide-seqV2. Nat. Biotechnol. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-020-0739-1 (2020).

  • 10.

    Salmén, F. et al. Barcoded solid-phase RNA capture for spatial transcriptomics profiling in mammalian tissue sections. Nat. Protoc. 13, 2501–2534 (2018).

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • 11.

    Liu, Y. et al. High-spatial-resolution multi-omics sequencing via deterministic barcoding in tissue. Cell 183, 1665–1681 (2020).

  • 12.

    Vickovic, S. et al. High-definition spatial transcriptomics for in situ tissue profiling. Nat. Methods 16, 987–990 (2019).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 13.

    Dey, P. in Basic and Advanced Laboratory Techniques in Histopathology and Cytology (ed. Dey, P.) 213–220 (Springer, 2018).

  • 14.

    Wagner, A., Regev, A. & Yosef, N. Revealing the vectors of cellular identity with single-cell genomics. Nat. Biotechnol. 34, 1145–1160 (2016).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 15.

    Tabula, Muris Consortium. A single-cell transcriptomic atlas characterizes ageing tissues in the mouse. Nature 583, 590–595 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  • 16.

    Dixit, A. et al. Perturb-seq: dissecting molecular circuits with scalable single-cell RNA profiling of pooled genetic screens. Cell 167, 1853–1866.e17 (2016).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 17.

    Gut, G., Herrmann, M. D. & Pelkmans, L. Multiplexed protein maps link subcellular organization to cellular states. Science 361, eaar7042 (2018).

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • 18.

    Fazal, F. M. et al. Atlas of subcellular RNA localization revealed by APEX-Seq. Cell 178, 473–490.e26 (2019).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 19.

    Wang, G. et al. Spatial organization of the transcriptome in individual neurons. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.07.414060 (2020).

  • 20.

    Ramilowski, J. A. et al. A draft network of ligand-receptor-mediated multicellular signalling in human. Nat. Commun. 6, 7866 (2015).

    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • 21.

    Balkwill, F. R., Capasso, M. & Hagemann, T. The tumor microenvironment at a glance. J. Cell Sci. 125, 5591–5596 (2012).

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • 22.

    Boisset, J.-C. et al. Mapping the physical network of cellular interactions. Nat. Methods 15, 547–553 (2018).

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • 23.

    Medaglia, C. et al. Spatial reconstruction of immune niches by combining photoactivatable reporters and scRNA-seq. Science 358, 1622–1626 (2017).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 24.

    Halpern, K. B. et al. Paired-cell sequencing enables spatial gene expression mapping of liver endothelial cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 36, 962–970 (2018).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 25.

    Codeluppi, S. et al. Spatial organization of the somatosensory cortex revealed by osmFISH. Nat. Methods 15, 932–935 (2018).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 26.

    Jerby-Arnon, L. & Regev, A. Mapping multicellular programs from single-cell profiles. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.08.11.245472 (2020).

  • 27.

    Efremova, M., Vento-Tormo, M., Teichmann, S. A. & Vento-Tormo, R. CellPhoneDB: inferring cell-cell communication from combined expression of multi-subunit ligand-receptor complexes. Nat. Protoc. 15, 1484–1506 (2020).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 28.

    Browaeys, R., Saelens, W. & Saeys, Y. NicheNet: modeling intercellular communication by linking ligands to target genes. Nat. Methods 17, 159–162 (2020).

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • 29.

    Cang, Z. & Nie, Q. Inferring spatial and signaling relationships between cells from single cell transcriptomic data. Nat. Commun. 11, 2084 (2020).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 30.

    Almet, A. A., Cang, Z., Jin, S. & Nie, Q. The landscape of cell–cell communication through single-cell transcriptomics. Curr. Opin. Syst. Biol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coisb.2021.03.007 (2021).

  • 31.

    Pelka, K. et al. Spatially organized multicellular immune hubs in human colorectal cancer. Cell 184, 4734–4752.e20 (2021).

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • 32.

    Armingol, E. et al. Inferring the spatial code of cell-cell interactions and communication across a whole animal body. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.11.22.392217 (2020).

  • 33.

    Tanevski, J., Flores, R. O. R., Gabor, A., Schapiro, D. & Saez-Rodriguez, J. Explainable multi-view framework for dissecting inter-cellular signaling from highly multiplexed spatial data. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.08.084145 (2020).

  • 34.

    Phillips, D. et al. Immune cell topography predicts response to PD-1blockade in cutaneous T cell lymphoma. Oncology https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.06.20244913 (2020).

  • 35.

    Schürch, C. M. et al. Coordinated cellular neighborhoods orchestrate antitumoral immunity at the colorectal cancer invasive front. Cell 182, 1341–1359.e19 (2020).

  • 36.

    Hartmann, F. J. et al. Single-cell metabolic profiling of human cytotoxicT cells. Nat. Biotechnol. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-020-0651-8 (2020).

  • 37.

    Lopez, R., Gayoso, A. & Yosef, N. Enhancing scientific discoveries in molecular biology with deep generative models. Mol. Syst. Biol. 16, e9198 (2020).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 38.

    Lopez, R., Regier, J., Cole, M. B., Jordan, M. I. & Yosef, N. Deep generative modeling for single-cell transcriptomics. Nat. Methods 15, 1053–1058 (2018).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 39.

    Eraslan, G., Simon, L. M., Mircea, M., Mueller, N. S. & Theis, F. J. Single-cell RNA-seq denoising using a deep count autoencoder. Nat. Commun. 10, 390 (2019).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 40.

    Borgwardt, K., Ghisu, E., Llinares-López, F., O’Bray, L. & Rieck, B. Graph kernels: state-of-the-art and future challenges. Preprint at arXiv (2020).

  • 41.

    Yuan, Y. & Bar-Joseph, Z. GCNG: graph convolutional networks for inferring gene interaction from spatial transcriptomics data. Genome Biol. 21, 300 (2020).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 42.

    Feldman, D. et al. Optical pooled screens in human cells. Cell 179, 787–799.e17 (2019).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 43.

    Wang, C., Lu, T., Emanuel, G., Babcock, H. P. & Zhuang, X. Imaging-based pooled CRISPR screening reveals regulators of lncRNA localization. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 10842–10851 (2019).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 44.

    Datlinger, P. et al. Pooled CRISPR screening with single-cell transcriptome readout. Nat. Methods 14, 297–301 (2017).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 45.

    Legnini, I. et al. Optogenetic perturbations of RNA expression in tissue space. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.09.26.461850 (2021).

  • 46.

    Zhao, E. et al. Spatial transcriptomics at subspot resolution with BayesSpace. Nat. Biotechnol. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-021-00935-2 (2021).

  • 47.

    Chen, Z., Soifer, I., Hilton, H., Keren, L. & Jojic, V. Modeling multiplexed images with spatial-LDA reveals novel tissue microenvironments. J. Comput. Biol. https://doi.org/10.1089/cmb.2019.0340 (2020).

  • 48.

    Kietzmann, T. Metabolic zonation of the liver: the oxygen gradient revisited. Redox Biol. 11, 622–630 (2017).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 49.

    Rogers, K. W. & Schier, A. F. Morphogen gradients: from generation to interpretation. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 27, 377–407 (2011).

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • 50.

    Saviano, A., Henderson, N. C. & Baumert, T. F. Single-cell genomics and spatial transcriptomics: discovery of novel cell states and cellular interactions in liver physiology and disease biology. J. Hepatol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2020.06.004 (2020).

  • 51.

    Ladoux, B. & Mège, R.-M. Mechanobiology of collective cell behaviours. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 18, 743–757 (2017).

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • 52.

    Vining, K. H. & Mooney, D. J. Mechanical forces direct stem cell behaviour in development and regeneration. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 18, 728–742 (2017).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 53.

    Arnol, D., Schapiro, D., Bodenmiller, B., Saez-Rodriguez, J. & Stegle, O. Modeling cell-cell interactions from spatial molecular data with spatial variance component analysis. Cell Rep. 29, 202–211.e6 (2019).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 54.

    Velten, B., Braunger, J. M., Arnol, D., Argelaguet, R. & Stegle, O. Identifying temporal and spatial patterns of variation from multi-modal data using MEFISTO. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.11.03.366674 (2020).

  • 55.

    Argelaguet, R. et al. MOFA+: a statistical framework for comprehensive integration of multi-modal single-cell data. Genome Biol. 21, 111 (2020).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 56.

    Walter, F. C., Stegle, O. & Velten, B. FISHFactor: a probabilistic factor model for spatial transcriptomics data with subcellular resolution. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.11.04.467354 (2021).

  • 57.

    William Townes, F. & Engelhardt, B. E. Nonnegative spatial factorization. Preprint at arXiv https://arxiv.org/abs/2110.06122 (2021).

  • 58.

    Fischer, D. S., Schaar, A. C. & Theis, F. J. Learning cell communication from spatial graphs of cells. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.07.11.451750 (2021).

  • 59.

    Pham, D. et al. stLearn: integrating spatial location, tissue morphology and gene expression to find cell types, cell-cell interactions and spatial trajectories within undissociated tissues. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.31.125658 (2020).

  • 60.

    Eraslan, G., Avsec, Ž., Gagneur, J. & Theis, F. J. Deep learning: new computational modelling techniques for genomics. Nat. Rev. Genet. 20, 389–403 (2019).

    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • 61.

    Cheplygina, V., de Bruijne, M. & Pluim, J. P. W. Not-so-supervised: a survey of semi-supervised, multi-instance, and transfer learning in medical image analysis. Med. Image Anal. 54, 280–296 (2019).

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • 62.

    Yang, K. D. et al. Multi-domain translation between single-cell imaging and sequencing data using autoencoders. Nat. Commun. 12, 31 (2021).

  • 63.

    Cheung, M., Shi, J., Jiang, L., Wright, O. & Moura, J. M. F. Pooling in graph convolutional neural networks. 2019 53rd Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems, and Computers 462–466 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1109/IEEECONF44664.2019.9048796

  • 64.

    Hetzel, L., Fischer, D. S., Günnemann, S. & Theis, F. J. Graph representation learning for single-cell biology. Curr. Opin. Syst. Biol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coisb.2021.05.008 (2021).

  • 65.

    Rood, J. E. et al. Toward a common coordinate framework for the human body. Cell 179, 1455–1467 (2019).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 66.

    Forrow, A. & Schiebinger, G. LineageOT is a unified framework for lineage tracing and trajectory inference. Nat. Commun. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-25133-1 (2021).

  • 67.

    Bergen, V., Lange, M., Peidli, S., Wolf, F. A. & Theis, F. J. Generalizing RNA velocity to transient cell states through dynamical modeling. Nat. Biotechnol. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-020-0591-3 (2020).

  • 68.

    Lange, M. et al. CellRank for directed single-cell fate mapping. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.10.19.345983 (2020).

  • 69.

    Schiebinger, G. et al. Optimal-transport analysis of single-cell gene expression identifies developmental trajectories in reprogramming. Cell 176, 928–943.e22 (2019).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 70.

    Fischer, D. S. et al. Inferring population dynamics from single-cell RNA-sequencing time series data. Nat. Biotechnol. 37, 461–468 (2019).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 71.

    Karaiskos, N. et al. The Drosophila embryo at single-cell transcriptome resolution. Science 358, 194–199 (2017).

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • 72.

    van den Brink, S. C. et al. Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics reveal somitogenesis in gastruloids. Nature 582, 405–409 (2020).

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • 73.

    Asp, M. et al. A spatiotemporal organ-wide gene expression and cell atlas of the developing human heart. Cell 179, 1647–1660.e19 (2019).

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • 74.

    Lohoff, T. et al. Integration of spatial and single-cell transcriptomic dataelucidates mouse organogenesis. Nat. Biotechnol. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-021-01006-2 (2021).

  • 75.

    Tyser, R. C. V. et al. Single-cell transcriptomic characterization of a gastrulating human embryo. Nature 600, 285–289 (2021).

  • 76.

    Alemany, A., Florescu, M., Baron, C. S., Peterson-Maduro, J. & van Oudenaarden, A. Whole-organism clone tracing using single-cell sequencing. Nature 556, 108–112 (2018).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 77.

    McKenna, A. et al. Whole-organism lineage tracing by combinatorial and cumulative genome editing. Science 353, aaf7907 (2016).

  • 78.

    Spanjaard, B. et al. Simultaneous lineage tracing and cell-type identification using CRISPR-Cas9-induced genetic scars. Nat. Biotechnol. 36, 469–473 (2018).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 79.

    Ludwig, L. S. et al. Lineage tracing in humans enabled by mitochondrial mutations and single-cell genomics. Cell 176, 1325–1339.e22 (2019).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 80.

    He, Z. et al. Lineage recording reveals dynamics of cerebral organoid regionalization. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.06.19.162032 (2020).

  • 81.

    Chow, K.-H. K. et al. Imaging cell lineage with a synthetic digital recording system. Science 372, eabb3099 (2021).

  • 82.

    La Manno, G. et al. RNA velocity of single cells. Nature 560, 494–498 (2018).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 83.

    Keren-Shaul, H. et al. A unique microglia type associated with restricting development of Alzheimer’s disease. Cell 169, 1276–1290.e17 (2017).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 84.

    Smillie, C. S. et al. Intra- and inter-cellular rewiring of the human colon during ulcerative colitis. Cell 178, 714–730.e22 (2019).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 85.

    Keren, L. et al. A structured tumor-immune microenvironment in triple negative breast cancer revealed by multiplexed ion beam imaging. Cell 174, 1373–1387.e19 (2018).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 86.

    Moncada, R. et al. Integrating microarray-based spatial transcriptomics and single-cell RNA-seq reveals tissue architecture in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas. Nat. Biotechnol. 38, 333–342 (2020).

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • 87.

    Berglund, E. et al. Spatial maps of prostate cancer transcriptomes reveal an unexplored landscape of heterogeneity. Nat. Commun. 9, 2419 (2018).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 88.

    Andersson, A. et al. Spatial deconvolution of HER2-positive breast cancer delineates tumor-associated cell type interactions. Nat. Commun. 12, 6012 (2021).

  • 89.

    Lomakin, A. et al. Spatial genomics maps the structure, character and evolution of cancer clones. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.04.16.439912 (2021).

  • 90.

    Kuppe, C. et al. Spatial multi-omic map of human myocardial infarction. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.08.411686 (2020).

  • 91.

    Chen, W.-T. et al. Spatial transcriptomics and in situ sequencing to study Alzheimer’s disease. Cell 182, 976–991.e19 (2020).

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • 92.

    Jackson, H. W. et al. The single-cell pathology landscape of breast cancer. Nature 578, 615–620 (2020).

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • 93.

    Liu, Z. et al. Integrating single-cell RNA-seq and imaging with SCOPE-seq2. Sci. Rep. 10, 19482 (2020).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 94.

    Schindelin, J. et al. Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat. Methods 9, 676–682 (2012).

    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • 95.

    McQuin, C. et al. CellProfiler 3.0: next-generation image processing for biology. PLoS Biol. 16, e2005970 (2018).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 96.

    Berg, S. et al. ilastik: interactive machine learning for (bio)image analysis. Nat. Methods 16, 1226–1232 (2019).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 97.

    Greenwald, N. F. et al. Whole-cell segmentation of tissue images with human-level performance using large-scale data annotation and deep learning. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.03.01.431313 (2021).

  • 98.

    Schmidt, U., Weigert, M., Broaddus, C. & Myers, G. Cell detection with star-convex polygons. Preprint at arXiv (2018).

  • 99.

    Stringer, C., Wang, T., Michaelos, M. & Pachitariu, M. Cellpose: a generalist algorithm for cellular segmentation. Nat. Methods 18, 100–106 (2021).

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • 100.

    Mandal, S. & Uhlmann, V. SplineDist: automated cell segmentation with spline curves. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.10.27.357640 (2021).

  • 101.

    Hörl, D. et al. BigStitcher: reconstructing high-resolution image datasets of cleared and expanded samples. Nat. Methods 16, 870–874 (2019).

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • 102.

    Andersson, A., Diego, F., Hamprecht, F. A. & Wählby, C. ISTDECO: in situ transcriptomics decoding by deconvolution. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.03.01.433040 (2021).

  • 103.

    Chen, S. et al. Barcode demixing through non-negative spatial regression (BarDensr). PLoS Comput. Biol. 17, e1008256 (2021).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 104.

    Cleary, B. et al. Compressed sensing for highly efficient imaging transcriptomics. Nat. Biotechnol. 39, 936–94 (2021).

  • 105.

    Asgari Taghanaki, S., Abhishek, K., Cohen, J. P., Cohen-Adad, J. & Hamarneh, G. Deep semantic segmentation of natural and medical images: a review. Artif. Intell. Rev. 54, 137–178 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  • 106.

    Dries, R. et al. Giotto: a toolbox for integrative analysis and visualization of spatial expression data. Genome Biol. 22, 78 (2021).

  • 107.

    Axelrod, S. et al. Starfish: open source image based transcriptomics and proteomics tools. J. Open Source Softw. 6, 2440 (2018).

  • 108.

    Palla, G. et al. Squidpy: a scalable framework for spatial single cell analysis. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.02.19.431994 (2021).

  • 109.

    von Chamier, L. et al. Democratising deep learning for microscopy with ZeroCostDL4Mic. Nat. Commun. 12, 2276 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  • 110.

    Moen, E. et al. Deep learning for cellular image analysis. Nat. Methods 16, 1233–1246 (2019).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 111.

    Partel, G. & Wählby, C. Spage2vec: unsupervised representation of localized spatial gene expression signatures. FEBS J. 288, 1859–1870 (2021).

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • 112.

    Petukhov, V. et al. Cell segmentation in imaging-based spatial transcriptomics. Nat. Biotechnol. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-021-01044-w (2021).

  • 113.

    Park, J. et al. Cell segmentation-free inference of cell types from in situ transcriptomics data. Nat. Commun. 12, 3545 (2021).

  • 114.

    Hu, J. et al. SpaGCN: integrating gene expression, spatial location and histology to identify spatial domains and spatially variable genes by graph convolutional network. Nat. Methods 18, 1342–1351 (2021).

  • 115.

    Daly, A. C., Geras, K. J. & Bonneau, R. A. A convolutional neural network for common coordinate registration of high-resolution histology images. Bioinformatics https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btab447 (2021).

  • 116.

    Biancalani, T. et al. Deep learning and alignment of spatially resolved single-cell transcriptomes with Tangram. Nat. Methods 18, 1352–1362 (2021).

  • 117.

    Kiemen, A. L. et al. In situ characterization of the 3D microanatomy of the pancreas and pancreatic cancer at single cell resolution. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.08.416909 (2020).

  • 118.

    Lin, J.-R. et al. Multiplexed 3D atlas of state transitions and immune interactions in colorectal cancer. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.03.31.437984 (2021).

  • 119.

    Qiang, Y. et al. A probabilistic approach for registration of multi-modal spatial transcriptomics data. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.10.05.463196 (2021).

  • 120.

    Ruiz Tejada Segura, M. et al. A 3D transcriptomics atlas of the mouse olfactory mucosa. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.06.16.448475 (2021).

  • 121.

    Schede, H. H. et al. Spatial tissue profiling by imaging-free molecular tomography. Nat. Biotechnol. 39, 968–977 (2021).

  • 122.

    Butler, A., Hoffman, P., Smibert, P., Papalexi, E. & Satija, R. Integrating single-cell transcriptomic data across different conditions, technologies, and species. Nat. Biotechnol. 36, 411–420 (2018).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 123.

    Amezquita, R. A. et al. Orchestrating single-cell analysis with Bioconductor. Nat. Methods 17, 137–145 (2020).

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • 124.

    Wolf, F. A., Angerer, P. & Theis, F. J. SCANPY: large-scale single-cell gene expression data analysis. Genome Biol. 19, 15 (2018).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 125.

    Dries, R. et al. Giotto: a toolbox for integrative analysis and visualization of spatial expression data. Genome Biol. 22, 78 (2021).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 126.

    Bergenstråhle, J., Larsson, L. & Lundeberg, J. Seamless integration of image and molecular analysis for spatial transcriptomics workflows. BMC Genomics 21, 482 (2020).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 127.

    Righelli, D. et al. SpatialExperiment: infrastructure for spatially resolved transcriptomics data in R using Bioconductor. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.01.27.428431 (2021).

  • 128.

    Sztanka-Toth, T. R., Jens, M., Karaiskos, N. & Rajewsky, N. Spacemake: processing and analysis of large-scale spatial transcriptomics data. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.11.07.467598 (2021).

  • 129.

    Chen, K. H., Boettiger, A. N., Moffitt, J. R., Wang, S. & Zhuang, X. RNA imaging. Spatially resolved, highly multiplexed RNA profiling in single cells. Science 348, aaa6090 (2015).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 130.

    Andersson, A. et al. Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics enables probabilistic inference of cell type topography. Commun. Biol. 3, 565 (2020).

  • 131.

    Maaskola, J. et al. Charting tissue expression anatomy by spatial transcriptome decomposition. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/362624 (2018).

  • 132.

    Cable, D. M. et al. Robust decomposition of cell type mixtures in spatial transcriptomics. Nat. Biotechnol. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-021-00830-w (2021).

  • 133.

    Aliee, H. & Theis, F. J. AutoGeneS: automatic gene selection using multi-objective optimization for RNA-seq deconvolution. Cell Syst. 12, 706–715.e4 (2021).

  • 134.

    Wang, X., Park, J., Susztak, K., Zhang, N. R. & Li, M. Bulk tissue cell type deconvolution with multi-subject single-cell expression reference. Nat. Commun. 10, 380 (2019).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 135.

    Newman, A. M. et al. Determining cell type abundance and expression from bulk tissues with digital cytometry. Nat. Biotechnol. 37, 773–782 (2019).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 136.

    Elosua-Bayes, M., Nieto, P., Mereu, E., Gut, I. & Heyn, H. SPOTlight: seeded NMF regression to deconvolute spatial transcriptomics spots with single-cell transcriptomes. Nucleic Acids Res. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkab043 (2021).

  • 137.

    Danaher, P. et al. Advances in mixed cell deconvolution enable quantification of cell types in spatially-resolved gene expression data. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.08.04.235168 (2020).

  • 138.

    Erdmann-Pham, D. D., Fischer, J., Hong, J. & Song, Y. S. Likelihood-based deconvolution of bulk gene expression data using single-cell references. Genome Res. 31, 1794–1806 (2021).

  • 139.

    Song, Q. & Su, J. DSTG: deconvoluting spatial transcriptomics data through graph-based artificial intelligence. Brief. Bioinform. 22, bbaa414 (2021).

  • 140.

    Welch, J. D. et al. Single-cell multi-omic integration compares and contrasts features of brain cell identity. Cell 177, 1873–1887.e17 (2019).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 141.

    Stuart, T. et al. Comprehensive integration of single-cell data. Cell 177, 1888–1902.e21 (2019).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 142.

    Argelaguet, R., Cuomo, A. S. E., Stegle, O. & Marioni, J. C. Computationalprinciples and challenges in single-cell data integration. Nat. Biotechnol. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-021-00895-7 (2021).

  • 143.

    Kleshchevnikov, V. et al. Comprehensive mapping of tissue cell architecture via integrated single cell and spatial transcriptomics. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.11.15.378125 (2020).

  • 144.

    Lopez, R. et al. A joint model of unpaired data from scRNA-seq and spatial transcriptomics for imputing missing gene expression measurements. Preprint at arXiv (2019).

  • 145.

    Abdelaal, T., Mourragui, S., Mahfouz, A. & Reinders, M. J. T. SpaGE: spatial gene enhancement using scRNA-seq. Nucleic Acids Res. 48, e107 (2020).

  • 146.

    Li, Z., Song, T., Yong, J. & Kuang, R. Imputation of spatially-resolved transcriptomes by graph-regularized tensor completion. PLoS Comput. Biol. 17, e1008218 (2021).

  • 147.

    Achim, K. et al. High-throughput spatial mapping of single-cell RNA-seq data to tissue of origin. Nat. Biotechnol. 33, 503–509 (2015).

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • 148.

    Satija, R., Farrell, J. A., Gennert, D., Schier, A. F. & Regev, A. Spatial reconstruction of single-cell gene expression data. Nat. Biotechnol. 33, 495–502 (2015).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 149.

    Fleck, J. S. et al. Resolving organoid brain region identities by mapping single-cell genomic data to reference atlases. Cell Stem Cell https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stem.2021.02.015 (2021).

  • 150.

    Nitzan, M., Karaiskos, N., Friedman, N. & Rajewsky, N. Gene expression cartography. Nature 576, 132–137 (2019).

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • 151.

    Chlis, N.-K., Rausch, L., Brocker, T., Kranich, J. & Theis, F. J. Predicting single-cell gene expression profiles of imaging flow cytometry data with machine learning. Nucleic Acids Res. 48, 11335–11346 (2020).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 152.

    Tan, X., Su, A., Tran, M. & Nguyen, Q. SpaCell: integrating tissue morphology and spatial gene expression to predict disease cells. Bioinformatics https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btz914 (2019).

  • 153.

    He, B. et al. Integrating spatial gene expression and breast tumour morphology via deep learning. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 4, 827–834 (2020).

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • 154.

    Bergenstråhle, L. et al. Super-resolved spatial transcriptomics by deep data fusion. Nat. Biotechnol. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-021-01075-3 (2021).

  • 155.

    Qin, Y. et al. A multi-scale map of cell structure fusing protein images and interactions. Nature 600, 536–542 (2021).

  • 156.

    Newell, A. & Deng, J. How useful is self-supervised pretraining for visual tasks? Preprint at arXiv (2020).

  • 157.

    Lu, A. X., Kraus, O. Z., Cooper, S. & Moses, A. M. Learning unsupervised feature representations for single cell microscopy images with paired cell inpainting. PLoS Comput. Biol. 15, e1007348 (2019).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 158.

    Mund, A. et al. AI-driven deep visual proteomics defines cell identity and heterogeneity. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.01.25.427969 (2021).

  • 159.

    Mahdessian, D. et al. Spatiotemporal dissection of the cell cycle with single-cell proteogenomics. Nature 590, 649–654 (2021).

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • 160.

    Viana, M. P. et al. Robust integrated intracellular organization of the human iPS cell: where, how much, and how variable? Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.08.415562 (2020).

  • 161.

    Heinrich, L. et al. Whole-cell organelle segmentation in volume electron microscopy. Nature 599, 141–146 (2021).

  • 162.

    Zhu, Q., Shah, S., Dries, R., Cai, L. & Yuan, G.-C. Identification of spatially associated subpopulations by combining scRNAseq and sequential fluorescence in situ hybridization data. Nat. Biotechnol. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.4260 (2018).

  • 163.

    Edsgärd, D., Johnsson, P. & Sandberg, R. Identification of spatial expression trends in single-cell gene expression data. Nat. Methods 15, 339–342 (2018).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 164.

    Svensson, V., Teichmann, S. A. & Stegle, O. SpatialDE: identification of spatially variable genes. Nat. Methods 15, 343–346 (2018).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 165.

    Sun, S., Zhu, J. & Zhou, X. Statistical analysis of spatial expression patterns for spatially resolved transcriptomic studies. Nat. Methods 17, 193–200 (2020).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 166.

    Zhu, J. & Sabatti, C. Integrative spatial single-cell analysis with graph-based feature learning. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.08.12.248971 (2020).

  • 167.

    Kueckelhaus, J. et al. Inferring spatially transient gene expression pattern from spatial transcriptomic studies. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.10.20.346544 (2020).

  • 168.

    Kats, I., Vento-Tormo, R. & Stegle, O. SpatialDE2: fast and localized variance component analysis of spatial transcriptomics. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.10.27.466045 (2021).

  • 169.

    BinTayyash, N. et al. Non-parametric modelling of temporal and spatial counts data from RNA-seq experiments. Bioinformatics https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btab486 (2021).

  • 170.

    Li, Q., Zhang, M., Xie, Y. & Xiao, G. Bayesian modeling of spatial molecular profiling data via Gaussian process. Preprint at arXiv (2020).

  • 171.

    Zhao, E. et al. Spatial transcriptomics at subspot resolution withBayesSpace. Nat. Biotechnol. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-021-00935-2 (2021).

  • 172.

    Chidester, B., Zhou, T. & Ma, J. SPICEMIX: integrative single-cell spatial modeling for inferring cell identity. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.11.29.383067 (2020).

  • 173.

    Oh, S., Park, H. & Zhang, X. Hybrid clustering of single-cell gene expression and spatial information via integrated NMF and k-means. Front. Genet. 12, 763263 (2021).

  • 174.

    Anderson, A. & Lundeberg, J. sepal: identifying transcript profiles withspatial patterns by diffusion-based modeling. Bioinformatics https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btab164 (2021).

  • 175.

    Schapiro, D. et al. histoCAT: analysis of cell phenotypes and interactions in multiplex image cytometry data. Nat. Methods 14, 873–876 (2017).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 176.

    Li, D., Ding, J. & Bar-Joseph, Z. Identifying signaling genes in spatial single-cell expression data. Bioinformatics 37, 968–975 (2021).

  • 177.

    Schmid, K. T. et al. scPower accelerates and optimizes the design of multi-sample single cell transcriptomic studies. Nat. Commun. 12, 6625 (2021).

  • 178.

    Vieth, B., Ziegenhain, C., Parekh, S., Enard, W. & Hellmann, I. powsimR: power analysis for bulk and single cell RNA-seq experiments. Bioinformatics 33, 3486–3488 (2017).

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • 179.

    Qian, X. et al. Probabilistic cell typing enables fine mapping of closely related cell types in situ. Nat. Methods 17, 101–106 (2020).

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • 180.

    Prabhakaran, S., Nawy, T. & Pe’er’, D. Sparcle: assigning transcripts to cells in multiplexed images. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.02.13.431099 (2021).

  • 181.

    He, Y. et al. ClusterMap for multi-scale clustering analysis of spatial gene expression. Nat. Commun. 12, 5909 (2021).

  • 182.

    He, Y. et al. ClusterMap for multi-scale clustering analysis of spatial gene expression. Nat. Commun. 12, 5909 (2021).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 183.

    Caicedo, J. C. et al. Data-analysis strategies for image-based cell profiling. Nat. Methods 14, 849–863 (2017).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 184.

    Baranski, A. et al. MAUI (MBI analysis user interface)-an image processing pipeline for multiplexed mass based imaging. PLoS Comput. Biol. 17, e1008887 (2021).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 185.

    Roberts, K. et al. Transcriptome-wide spatial RNA profiling maps the cellular architecture of the developing human neocortex. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.03.20.436265 (2021).

  • 186.

    Bahry, E. et al. RS-FISH: precise, interactive, fast, and scalable FISH spot detection. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.03.09.434205 (2021).

  • 187.

    Wang, Y. et al. De-noising spatial expression profiling data based on in situ position and image information. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.11.03.467103 (2021).

  • 188.

    Andersson, A. et al. A landmark-based common coordinate framework for spatial transcriptomics data. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.11.11.468178 (2021).

  • 189.

    Schapiro, D. et al. MCMICRO: a scalable, modular image-processing pipeline for multiplexed tissue imaging. Nat. Methods https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-021-01308-y (2021).

  • 190.

    Bergenstråhle, J., Bergenstråhle, L. & Lundeberg, J. SpatialCPie: an R/Bioconductor package for spatial transcriptomics cluster evaluation. BMC Bioinforma. 21, 161 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  • 191.

    Fan, Z., Chen, R. & Chen, X. SpatialDB: a database for spatially resolved transcriptomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 48, D233–D237 (2020).

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • 192.

    Queen, R., Cheung, K., Lisgo, S., Coxhead, J. & Cockell, S. Spaniel: analysis and interactive sharing of spatial transcriptomics data. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/619197 (2019).

  • 193.

    Solorzano, L., Partel, G. & Wählby, C. TissUUmaps: interactive visualization of large-scale spatial gene expression and tissue morphology data. Bioinformatics 36, 4363–4365 (2020).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 194.

    Dimitrov, D. et al. Comparison of resources and methods to infer cell-cell communication from single-cell RNA data. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.05.21.445160 (2021).

  • 195.

    Gao, C. et al. Iterative single-cell multi-omic integration using online learning. Nat. Biotechnol. 39, 1000–1007 (2021).

  • 196.

    Geuenich, M. J. et al. Automated assignment of cell identity from single-cell multiplexed imaging and proteomic data. Cell Syst. 12, 1173–1186.e5 (2021).

  • 197.

    Dong, R. & Yuan, G.-C. SpatialDWLS: accurate deconvolution of spatial transcriptomic data. Genome Biol. 22, 145 (2021).

  • 198.

    Äijö, T. et al. Splotch: robust estimation of aligned spatial temporal gene expression data. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/757096 (2019).

  • 199.

    Biancalani, T. et al. Deep learning and alignment of spatially resolved single-cell transcriptomes with Tangram. Nat. Methods 18, 1352–1362 (2021).

  • 200.

    Lopez, R. et al. Multi-resolution deconvolution of spatial transcriptomics data reveals continuous patterns of inflammation. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.05.10.443517 (2021).

  • 201.

    Chen, S., Zhang, B., Chen, X., Zhang, X. & Jiang, R. stPlus: a reference-based method for the accurate enhancement of spatial transcriptomics. Bioinformatics https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btab298 (2021).

  • 202.

    Fleck, J. S. et al. Resolving organoid brain region identities by mappingsingle-cell genomic data to reference atlases. Cell Stem Cell https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stem.2021.02.015 (2021).

  • 203.

    Okochi, Y., Sakaguchi, S., Nakae, K., Kondo, T. & Naoki, H. Model-based prediction of spatial gene expression via generative linear mapping. Nat. Commun. 12, 3731 (2021).

  • 204.

    Mattiazzi Usaj, M. et al. Systematic genetics and single-cell imaging reveal widespread morphological pleiotropy and cell-to-cell variability. Mol. Syst. Biol. 16, e9243 (2020).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 205.

    Govek, K. W. et al. Single-cell transcriptomic analysis of mIHC images via antigen mapping. Sci. Adv. 7, eabc5464 (2021).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 206.

    Gu, C. & Liu, Z. A network regularized linear model to infer spatial expression pattern for single cells. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.03.07.434296 (2021).

  • 207.

    Xu, Y. & McCord, R. P. CoSTA: unsupervised convolutional neural network learning for spatial transcriptomics analysis. BMC Bioinformatics 22, 397 (2021).

  • 208.

    Hao, M., Hua, K. & Zhang, X. SOMDE: a scalable method for identifying spatially variable genes with self-organizing map. Bioinformatics https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btab471 (2021).

  • 209.

    Allen, C. et al. A Bayesian multivariate mixture model for spatial transcriptomics data. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.06.23.449615 (2021).

  • 210.

    Teng, H., Yuan, Y. & Bar-Joseph, Z. Cell type assignments for spatial transcriptomics data. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.02.25.432887 (2021).

  • 211.

    Verma, A. & Engelhardt, B. A Bayesian nonparametric semi-supervised model for integration of multiple single-cell experiments. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.01.14.906313 (2020).

  • 212.

    Sottosanti, A. & Risso, D. Co-clustering of spatially resolved transcriptomic data. Preprint at arXiv (2021).

  • 213.

    Teng, H., Yuan, Y. & Bar-Joseph, Z. Clustering spatial transcriptomics data. Bioinformatics https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btab704 (2021).

  • 214.

    Stroup, W. W. Power analysis based on spatial effects mixed models: a tool for comparing design and analysis strategies in the presence of spatial variability. J. Agric. Biol. Environ. Stat. 7, 491–511 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  • 215.

    Ellis, M. M., Ivan, J. S., Tucker, J. M. & Schwartz, M. K. rSPACE: spatially based power analysis for conservation and ecology. Methods Ecol. Evol. 6, 621–625 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  • 216.

    Buller, I. D., Brown, D. W., Myers, T. A., Jones, R. R. & Machiela, M. J. sparrpowR: a flexible R package to estimate statistical power to identify spatial clustering of two groups and its application. Int. J. Health Geogr. 20, 13 (2021).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 217.

    Martin, K. C. & Ephrussi, A. mRNA localization: gene expression in the spatial dimension. Cell 136, 719–730 (2009).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 218.

    Crosetto, N., Bienko, M. & van Oudenaarden, A. Spatially resolved transcriptomics and beyond. Nat. Rev. Genet. 16, 57–66 (2015).

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • 219.

    Burgess, D. J. Spatial transcriptomics coming of age. Nat. Rev. Genet. 20, 317 (2019).

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • 220.

    Perkel, J. M. Starfish enterprise: finding RNA patterns in single cells. Nature 572, 549–551 (2019).

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • 221.

    Asp, M., Bergenstråhle, J. & Lundeberg, J. Spatially resolved transcriptomes—next generation tools for tissue exploration. Bioessays 42, e1900221 (2020).

  • 222.

    Smith, E. A. & Hodges, H. C. The spatial and genomic hierarchy of tumor ecosystems revealed by single-cell technologies. Trends Cancer Res. 5, 411–425 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  • 223.

    Wilbrey-Clark, A., Roberts, K. & Teichmann, S. A. Cell Atlas technologies and insights into tissue architecture. Biochem. J. 477, 1427–1442 (2020).

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • 224.

    Zhang, M. et al. Spatial molecular profiling: platforms, applications andanalysis tools. Brief. Bioinform. https://doi.org/10.1093/bib/bbaa145 (2020).

  • 225.

    Zhuang, X. Spatially resolved single-cell genomics and transcriptomics by imaging. Nat. Methods 18, 18–22 (2021).

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • 226.

    Larsson, L., Frisén, J. & Lundeberg, J. Spatially resolved transcriptomics adds a new dimension to genomics. Nat. Methods 18, 15–18 (2021).

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • 227.

    Marx, V. Method of the Year: spatially resolved transcriptomics. Nat. Methods 18, 9–14 (2021).

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • 228.

    Close, J. L., Long, B. R. & Zeng, H. Spatially resolved transcriptomics in neuroscience. Nat. Methods 18, 23–25 (2021).

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • 229.

    Moses, L. & Pachter, L. Museum of spatial transcriptomics. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.05.11.443152 (2021).

  • Source link