Asp, M., Bergenstrahle, J. & Lundeberg, J. Spatially resolved transcriptomes-next generation tools for tissue exploration. Bioessays 42, e1900221 (2020).
Google Scholar
Lubeck, E., Coskun, A. F., Zhiyentayev, T., Ahmad, M. & Cai, L. Single-cell in situ RNA profiling by sequential hybridization. Nat. Methods 11, 360–361 (2014).
Google Scholar
Shah, S., Lubeck, E., Zhou, W. & Cai, L. In situ transcription profiling of single cells reveals spatial organization of cells in the mouse hippocampus. Neuron 92, 342–357 (2016).
Google Scholar
Eng, C. L. et al. Transcriptome-scale super-resolved imaging in tissues by RNA seqFISH. Nature 568, 235–239 (2019).
Google Scholar
Moffitt, J. R. et al. Molecular, spatial, and functional single-cell profiling of the hypothalamic preoptic region. Science 362, eaau5324 (2018).
Google Scholar
Chen, K. H., Boettiger, A. N., Moffitt, J. R., Wang, S. & Zhuang, X. RNA imaging. Spatially resolved, highly multiplexed RNA profiling in single cells. Science 348, aaa6090 (2015).
Google Scholar
Wang, X. et al. Three-dimensional intact-tissue sequencing of single-cell transcriptional states. Science 361, eaat5691 (2018).
Google Scholar
Lee, J. H. et al. Highly multiplexed subcellular RNA sequencing in situ. Science 343, 1360–1363 (2014).
Google Scholar
Stahl, P. L. et al. Visualization and analysis of gene expression in tissue sections by spatial transcriptomics. Science 353, 78–82 (2016).
Google Scholar
Rodriques, S. G. et al. Slide-seq: A scalable technology for measuring genome-wide expression at high spatial resolution. Science 363, 1463–1467 (2019).
Google Scholar
Stickels, R. R. et al. Highly sensitive spatial transcriptomics at near-cellular resolution with Slide-seqV2. Nat. Biotechnol. 39, 313–319 (2020).
Google Scholar
Vickovic, S. et al. High-definition spatial transcriptomics for in situ tissue profiling. Nat. Methods 16, 987–990 (2019).
Google Scholar
Moncada, R. et al. Integrating microarray-based spatial transcriptomics and single-cell RNA-seq reveals tissue architecture in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas. Nat. Biotechnol. 38, 333–342 (2020).
Google Scholar
Chen, W. T. et al. Spatial transcriptomics and in situ sequencing to study Alzheimer’s disease. Cell 182, 976–991 e919 (2020).
Google Scholar
Blondel, V. D., Guillaume, J.-L., Lambiotte, R. & Lefebvre, E. Fast unfolding of communities in large networks. J. Stat. Mech.: Theory Exp. 2008, P10008 (2008).
Google Scholar
Zhu, Q., Shah, S., Dries, R., Cai, L. & Yuan, G. C. Identification of spatially associated subpopulations by combining scRNAseq and sequential fluorescence in situ hybridization data. Nat. Biotechnol. 36, 1183–1190 (2018).
Google Scholar
Pham, D. et al. stLearn: Integrating spatial location, tissue morphology and gene expression to find cell types, cell–cell interactions and spatial trajectories within undissociated tissues. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.31.125658 (2020).
Zhao, E. et al. Spatial transcriptomics at subspot resolution with BayesSpace. Nat. Biotechnol. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-021-00935-2 (2021).
Fu, X. et al. Continuous polony gels for tissue mapping with high resolution and RNA capture efficiency. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.03.17.435795 (2021).
Chen, A. et al. Large field of view-spatially resolved transcriptomics at nanoscale resolution. bioRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.01.17.427004 (2021).
Liu, Y. et al. High-spatial-resolution multi-omics sequencing via deterministic barcoding in tissue. Cell 183, 1665–1681 e1618 (2020).
Google Scholar
Cho, C. S. et al. Microscopic examination of spatial transcriptome using Seq-Scope. Cell 184, 3559–3572 e3522 (2021).
Google Scholar
Edsgard, D., Johnsson, P. & Sandberg, R. Identification of spatial expression trends in single-cell gene expression data. Nat. Methods 15, 339–342 (2018).
Google Scholar
Svensson, V., Teichmann, S. A. & Stegle, O. SpatialDE: Identification of spatially variable genes. Nat. Methods 15, 343–346 (2018).
Google Scholar
Sun, S., Zhu, J. & Zhou, X. Statistical analysis of spatial expression patterns for spatially resolved transcriptomic studies. Nat. Methods 17, 193–200 (2020).
Google Scholar
Xie, J., Girshick, R. & Farhadi, A. Unsupervised deep embedding for clustering analysis. In Proc. 33rd International Conference on Machine Learning Vol. 48 (JMLR: W&CP, 2016).
Li, H., Calder, C. A. & Cressie, N. Beyond Moran’s I: testing for spatial dependence based on the spatial autoregressive model. Geographical Anal. 39, 357–375 (2007).
Google Scholar
Abdelaal, T., Mourragui, S., Mahfouz, A. & Reinders, M. J. T. SpaGE: Spatial Gene Enhancement using scRNA-seq. Nucleic Acids Res. 48, e107 (2020).
Google Scholar
Cable, D. M. et al. Robust decomposition of cell type mixtures in spatial transcriptomics. Nat. Biotechnol. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-021-00830-w (2021).
Li, D. et al. KRT17 Functions as a tumor promoter and regulates proliferation, migration and invasion in pancreatic cancer via mTOR/S6k1 pathway. Cancer Manag. Res. 12, 2087–2095 (2020).
Google Scholar
Lee, J., Lee, J. & Kim, J. H. Identification of matrix metalloproteinase 11 as a prognostic biomarker in pancreatic cancer. Anticancer Res. 39, 5963–5971 (2019).
Google Scholar
Maynard, K. R. et al. Transcriptome-scale spatial gene expression in the human dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Nat. Neurosci. 24, 425–436 (2021).
Google Scholar
Dataset. Mouse posterior brain data. 10x Genomics https://support.10xgenomics.com/spatial-gene-expression/datasets/1.0.0/V1_Mouse_Brain_Sagittal_Posterior (2020).
Zhang, Y. et al. Purification and characterization of progenitor and mature human astrocytes reveals transcriptional and functional differences with mouse. Neuron 89, 37–53 (2016).
Google Scholar
Partel, G. & Wahlby, C. Spage2vec: Unsupervised representation of localized spatial gene expression signatures. FEBS J. 288, 1859–1870 (2021).
Google Scholar
Kipf, T. N. & Welling, M. Semi-supervised classification with graph convolutional networks. In Proc. International Conference on Learning Representations. arXiv:1609.02907 (2017).
Rousseeuw, P. J. Silhouettes: a graphical aid to the interpretaion and validation of cluster analysis. Computational Appl. Math. 20, 53–65 (1987).
Google Scholar
Lakkis, J. et al. A joint deep learning model enables simultaneous batch effect correction, denoising and clustering in single-cell transcriptomics. Genome Res. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.271874.120 (2021).
Li, X. et al. Deep learning enables accurate clustering with batch effect removal in single-cell RNA-seq analysis. Nat. Commun. 11, 2338 (2020).
Google Scholar
