Fu, X., Wang, H. & Hu, P. Stem cell activation in skeletal muscle regeneration. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 72, 1663–1677 (2015).
Google Scholar
Nowak, K. J. & Davies, K. E. Duchenne muscular dystrophy and dystrophin: pathogenesis and opportunities for treatment. EMBO Rep. 5, 872–876 (2004).
Google Scholar
Grogan, B. F. & Hsu, M. A. J. J. R. Volumetric Muscle Loss. J. Am. Acad. Orthop. Surg. 19, 35–37 (2011).
Osaki, T., Uzel, S. G. M. & Kamm, R. D. On-chip 3D neuromuscular model for drug screening and precision medicine in neuromuscular disease. Nat. Protoc. 15, 421–449 (2020).
Google Scholar
Takahashi, K. & Yamanaka, S. Induction of pluripotent stem. Cells Mouse Embryonic Adult Fibroblast Cult. Defined Factors Cell 126, 663–676 (2006).
Google Scholar
Sato, T. Induction of skeletal muscle progenitors and stem cells from human induced pluripotent stem cells. J. Neuromuscul. Dis. 7, 395–405 (2020).
Google Scholar
del Carmen Ortuño-Costela, M. et al. iPSCs: a powerful tool for skeletal muscle tissue engineering. J. Cell. Mol. Med. 23, 3784–3794 (2019).
Google Scholar
Jiwlawat, N., Lynch, E., Jeffrey, J., Van Dyke, J. M. & Suzuki, M. Current progress and challenges for skeletal muscle differentiation from human pluripotent stem cells using transgene-free approaches. Stem Cells Int 2018, 1–18 (2018).
Kodaka, Y., Rabu, G. & Asakura, A. Skeletal muscle cell induction from pluripotent stem cells. Stem Cells Int 2017, 1–16 (2017).
Khodabukus, A., Prabhu, N., Wang, J. & Bursac, N. In vitro tissue-engineered skeletal muscle models for studying muscle physiology and disease. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 7, e1701498 (2018).
Google Scholar
Darabi, R. et al. Human ES- and iPS-derived myogenic progenitors restore DYSTROPHIN and improve contractility upon transplantation in dystrophic mice. Cell Stem Cell 10, 610–619 (2012).
Google Scholar
Tedesco, F. S. et al. Transplantation of genetically corrected human iPSC-derived progenitors in mice with limb-girdle muscular dystrophy. Sci. Transl. Med. 4, 140ra89 (2012).
Google Scholar
Tanaka, A. et al. Efficient and reproducible myogenic differentiation from human iPS cells: prospects for modeling miyoshi myopathy in vitro. PLoS One 8, e61540 (2013).
Google Scholar
Quattrocelli, M. et al. Mesodermal iPSC-derived progenitor cells functionally regenerate cardiac and skeletal muscle. J. Clin. Invest 125, 4463–4482 (2015).
Google Scholar
Rao, L., Qian, Y., Khodabukus, A., Ribar, T. & Bursac, N. Engineering human pluripotent stem cells into a functional skeletal muscle tissue. Nat. Commun. 9, 126 (2018).
Google Scholar
Awaya, T. et al. Selective development of myogenic mesenchymal cells from human embryonic and induced pluripotent stem cells. PLoS ONE 7, e51638 (2012).
Google Scholar
Sakai-Takemura, F. et al. Premyogenic progenitors derived from human pluripotent stem cells expand in floating culture and differentiate into transplantable myogenic progenitors. Sci. Rep. 8, 6555 (2018).
Google Scholar
van der Wal, E. et al. Large-scale expansion of human iPSC-derived skeletal muscle cells for disease modeling and cell-based therapeutic strategies. Stem cell Rep. 10, 1975–1990 (2018).
Baci, D. et al. Extracellular vesicles from skeletal muscle cells efficiently promote myogenesis in induced pluripotent stem cells. Cells 9, 1527 (2020).
Google Scholar
He, R. et al. Engraftment of human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived myogenic progenitors restores dystrophin in mice with duchenne muscular dystrophy. Biol. Res. 53, 22 (2020).
Google Scholar
Maffioletti, S. M. et al. Three-dimensional human iPSC-derived artificial skeletal muscles model muscular dystrophies and enable multilineage tissue engineering. Cell Rep. 23, 899–908 (2018).
Google Scholar
Selvaraj, S. & Perlingeiro, R. C. R. Induced pluripotent stem cells for neuromuscular diseases: potential for disease modeling, drug screening, and regenerative medicine. 1–3, 471–481 (2019).
Madden, L., Juhas, M., Kraus, W. E., Truskey, G. A. & Bursac, N. Bioengineered human myobundles mimic clinical responses of skeletal muscle to drugs. Elife 2015, e04885 (2015).
Abujarour, R. et al. Myogenic differentiation of muscular dystrophy-specific induced pluripotent stem cells for use in drug discovery. Stem Cells Transl. Med 3, 149–160 (2014).
Google Scholar
Shoji, E. et al. Early pathogenesis of Duchenne muscular dystrophy modelled in patient-derived human induced pluripotent stem cells. Sci. Rep. 5, 1−13 (2015).
Lenzi, J. et al. Differentiation of control and ALS mutant human iPSCs into functional skeletal muscle cells, a tool for the study of neuromuscolar diseases. Stem Cell Res 17, 140–147 (2016).
Google Scholar
Ricotti, L. et al. Biohybrid actuators for robotics: a review of devices actuated by living cells. Sci. Robot. 2, eaaq0495 (2017).
Google Scholar
Piga, D. et al. Human induced pluripotent stem cell models for the study and treatment of Duchenne and Becker muscular dystrophies. Ther. Adv. Neurol. Disord. 12, 1–28 (2019).
Nogami, K., Blanc, M., Takemura, F., Takeda, S. & Miyagoe-Suzuki, Y. Making Skeletal Muscle from Human Pluripotent Stem Cells. Muscle Cell and Tissue – Current Status of Research Field (2018).
Jiwlawat, N. et al. Micropatterned substrates with physiological stiffness promote cell maturation and Pompe disease phenotype in human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived skeletal myocytes. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 116, 2377–2392 (2019).
Google Scholar
Watt, F. M. & Hogan, B. L. M. Out of eden: Stem cells and their niches. Science 287, 1427–1430 (2000).
Google Scholar
Ricotti, L. & Menciassi, A. Engineering stem cells for future medicine. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 60, 727–734 (2013).
Google Scholar
Maleiner, B. et al. The importance of biophysical and biochemical stimuli in dynamic skeletal muscle models. Front. Physiol. 9, 1130 (2018).
Google Scholar
Engler, A. J., Sen, S., Sweeney, H. L. & Discher, D. E. Matrix elasticity directs stem cell lineage specification. Cell 126, 677–689 (2006).
Google Scholar
Chal, J. & Pourquié, O. Making muscle: skeletal myogenesis in vivo and in vitro. Development 144, 2104–2122 (2017).
Google Scholar
Buckingham, M. Skeletal muscle formation in vertebrates. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 11, 440–448 (2001).
Google Scholar
Bentzinger, C. F., Wang, Y. X. & Rudnicki, M. A. Building muscle: molecular regulation of myogenesis. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 4, a008342 (2012).
Google Scholar
Sakuma, K. The Plasticity of Skeletal Muscle: From Molecular Mechanism to Clinical Applications. (Springer Singapore, 2017).
Pownall, M. E., Gustafsson, M. K. & Emerson, C. P. J. Myogenic Regulatory Factors and the Specification of Muscle Progenitors in Vertebrate Embryos. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 18, 747–783 (2003).
Sato, Y. Dorsal aorta formation: separate origins, lateral-to-medial migration, and remodeling. Dev. Growth Differ. 55, 113–129 (2013).
Google Scholar
Purslow, P. P. The structure and role of intramuscular connective tissue in muscle function. Front. Physiol. 11, 495 (2020).
Google Scholar
Gillies, A. R. & Lieber, R. L. Structure and function of the skeletal muscle extracellular matrix. Muscle Nerve 44, 318–331 (2011).
Google Scholar
Csapo, R., Gumpenberger, M. & Wessner, B. Skeletal muscle extracellular matrix – what do we know about its composition, regulation, and physiological roles? a narrative review. Front. Physiol. 11, 253 (2020).
Google Scholar
Armulik, A., Genové, G. & Betsholtz, C. Pericytes: developmental, physiological, and pathological perspectives, problems, and promises. Developmental Cell 21, 193–215 (2011).
Google Scholar
Stifani, N. Motor neurons and the generation of spinal motor neuron diversity. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 8, 293 (2014).
Google Scholar
Selvaraj, S. et al. Screening identifies small molecules that enhance the maturation of human pluripotent stem cell-derived myotubes. Elife 8, (2019).
Constantinides, P. G., Jones, P. A. & Gevers, W. Functional striated muscle cells from non-myoblast precursors following 5-azacytidine treatment. Nature 267, 364–366 (1977).
Google Scholar
Davis, R. L., Weintraub, H. & Lassar, A. B. Expression of a single transfected cDNA converts fibroblasts to myoblasts. Cell 51, 987–1000 (1987).
Google Scholar
Nabeshima, Y. et al. Myogenin gene disruption results in perinatal lethality because of severe muscle defect. Nature 364, 532–535 (1993).
Google Scholar
Albini, S. et al. Epigenetic reprogramming of human embryonic stem cells into skeletal muscle cells and generation of contractile myospheres. Cell Rep. 3, 661–670 (2013).
Google Scholar
Uchimura, T., Otomo, J., Sato, M. & Sakurai, H. A human iPS cell myogenic differentiation system permitting high-throughput drug screening. Stem Cell Res 25, 98–106 (2017).
Google Scholar
Pettinato, G., Wen, X. & Zhang, N. Formation of well-defined embryoid bodies from dissociated human induced pluripotent stem cells using microfabricated cell-repellent microwell arrays. Sci. Rep. 4, 1–11 (2014). 2014 41.
Rungarunlert, S., Techakumphu, M., Pirity, M. K. & Dinnyes, A. Embryoid body formation from embryonic and induced pluripotent stem cells: Benefits of bioreactors. World J. Stem Cells 1, 11 (2009).
Google Scholar
Sato, T. et al. Core transcription factors promote induction of PAX3-positive skeletal muscle stem cells. Stem cell Rep. 13, 352–365 (2019).
Google Scholar
Magli, A. et al. PAX7 Targets, CD54, Integrin α9β1 and SDC2, Allow Isolation of Human ES/iPS Cell-Derived Myogenic Progenitors. Cell Rep. 19, 2867 (2017).
Google Scholar
Warren, L. et al. Highly efficient reprogramming to pluripotency and directed differentiation of human cells with synthetic modified mRNA. Cell Stem Cell 7, 618–630 (2010).
Google Scholar
Mizuno, Y. et al. Generation of skeletal muscle stem/progenitor cells from murine induced pluripotent stem cells. FASEB J. Publ. Fed. Am. Soc. Exp. Biol. 24, 2245–2253 (2010).
Google Scholar
Shelton, M., Kocharyan, A., Liu, J., Skerjanc, I. S. & Stanford, W. L. Robust generation and expansion of skeletal muscle progenitors and myocytes from human pluripotent stem cells. Methods 101, 73–84 (2016).
Google Scholar
Chal, J. et al. Recapitulating early development of mouse musculoskeletal precursors of the paraxial mesoderm in vitro. Development 145, dev157339 (2018).
Swartz, E. W. et al. A novel protocol for directed differentiation of C9orf72-associated human induced pluripotent stem cells into contractile skeletal myotubes. Stem Cells Transl. Med 5, 1461–1472 (2016).
Google Scholar
Iovino, S., Burkart, A. M., Warren, L., Patti, M. E. & Kahn, C. R. Myotubes derived from human-induced pluripotent stem cells mirror in vivo insulin resistance. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 113, 1889–1894 (2016).
Google Scholar
Chal, J. et al. Generation of human muscle fibers and satellite-like cells from human pluripotent stem cells in vitro. Nat. Protoc. 11, 1833–1850 (2016).
Google Scholar
Hosoyama, T., McGivern, J. V., Van Dyke, J. M., Ebert, A. D. & Suzuki, M. Derivation of myogenic progenitors directly from human pluripotent stem cells using a sphere-based culture. Stem Cells Transl. Med 3, 564–574 (2014).
Google Scholar
Tey, S.-R., Robertson, S., Lynch, E. & Suzuki, M. Coding cell identity of human skeletal muscle progenitor cells using cell surface markers: current status and remaining challenges for characterization and isolation. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 0, 284 (2019).
Hicks, M. R. et al. ERBB3 and NGFR mark a distinct skeletal muscle progenitor cell in human development and hPSCs. Nat. Cell Biol. 20, 46–57 (2018).
Nalbandian, M. et al. Characterization of hiPSC-derived muscle progenitors reveals distinctive markers for myogenic cell purification toward cell therapy. Stem cell Rep. 16, 883–898 (2021).
Google Scholar
Al Tanoury, Z. et al. Differentiation of the human PAX7-positive myogenic precursors/satellite cell lineage in vitro. Dev 147, dev187344 (2020).
Google Scholar
Rocheteau, P., Gayraud-Morel, B., Siegl-Cachedenier, I., Blasco, M. A. & Tajbakhsh, S. A subpopulation of adult skeletal muscle stem cells retains all template DNA strands after cell division. Cell 148, 112–125 (2012).
Google Scholar
SS, C. et al. Skeletal muscle stem cells from PSC-derived teratomas have functional regenerative capacity. Cell Stem Cell 23, 74–85.e6 (2018).
Iberite, F. et al. Combined effects of electrical stimulation and protein coatings on myotube formation in a soft porous scaffold. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 48, 734–746 (2020).
Google Scholar
Khodabukus, A. et al. Electrical stimulation increases hypertrophy and metabolic flux in tissue-engineered human skeletal muscle. Biomaterials 198, 259–269 (2019).
Google Scholar
Hasebe, A. et al. Biohybrid actuators based on skeletal muscle-powered microgrooved ultrathin films consisting of poly(styrene- block-butadiene- block-styrene). ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 5, 5734–5743 (2019).
Google Scholar
Mueller, C. et al. Effects of External Stimulators on Engineered Skeletal Muscle Tissue Maturation. Adv. Mater. Interfaces 8, 2001167 (2020).
Ma, R. et al. Electrical stimulation enhances cardiac differentiation of human induced pluripotent stem cells for myocardial infarction therapy. Antioxid. Redox Signal 28, 371–384 (2018).
Google Scholar
Ruan, J. L. et al. Mechanical stress conditioning and electrical stimulation promote contractility and force maturation of induced pluripotent stem cell-derived human cardiac tissue. Circulation 134, 1557–1567 (2016).
Google Scholar
Hernández, D. et al. Electrical stimulation promotes cardiac differentiation of human induced pluripotent stem cells. Stem Cells Int. 2016, 1718041 (2016).
Yamada, M. et al. Electrical stimulation modulates fate determination of differentiating embryonic stem cells. Stem Cells 25, 562–570 (2007).
Google Scholar
Merrill, D. R., Bikson, M. & Jefferys, J. G. R. Electrical stimulation of excitable tissue: design of efficacious and safe protocols. J. Neurosci. Methods 141, 171–198 (2005).
Google Scholar
Zheng, X. S., Tan, C., Castagnola, E. & Cui, X. T. Electrode materials for chronic electrical microstimulation. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 10, 2100119 (2021).
Google Scholar
Stewart, D. M. The role of tension in muscle growth. in Regulation of Organ and Tissue Growth. 77–100 (New York: Associated Press, 1972).
Orr, A. W., Helmke, B. P., Blackman, B. R. & Schwartz, M. A. Mechanisms of mechanotransduction. Developmental Cell 10, 11–20 (2006).
Google Scholar
Burkholder, T. J. Mechanotransduction in skeletal muscle. Front. Biosci. 12, 174–191 (2007).
Google Scholar
Somers, S. M., Spector, A. A., DiGirolamo, D. J. & Grayson, W. L. Biophysical stimulation for engineering functional skeletal muscle. Tissue Eng. Part B Rev. 23, 362–372 (2017).
Google Scholar
Thomas, C. H., Collier, J. H., Sfeir, C. S. & Healy, K. E. Engineering gene expression and protein synthesis by modulation of nuclear shape. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 99, 1972–1977 (2002).
Google Scholar
Formigli, L. et al. Cytoskeleton/stretch-activated ion channel interaction regulates myogenic differentiation of skeletal myoblasts. J. Cell. Physiol. 211, 296–306 (2007).
Google Scholar
Tidball, J. G. et al. Mechanical loading regulates NOS expression and activity in developing and adult skeletal muscle. Am. J. Physiol. -Cell Physiol. 275, C260–C266 (1998).
Google Scholar
Bodine, S. C. et al. Akt/mTOR pathway is a crucial regulator of skeletal muscle hypertrophy and can prevent muscle atrophy in vivo. Nat. Cell Biol. 3, 1014–1019 (2001).
Google Scholar
De Deyne, P. G. Formation of sarcomeres in developing myotubes: Role of mechanical stretch and contractile activation. Am. J. Physiol. – Cell Physiol. 279, C1801–C1811 (2000).
Google Scholar
Heher, P. et al. A novel bioreactor for the generation of highly aligned 3D skeletal muscle-like constructs through orientation of fibrin via application of static strain. Acta Biomater. 24, 251–265 (2015).
Google Scholar
Juhas, M. & Bursac, N. Roles of adherent myogenic cells and dynamic culture in engineered muscle function and maintenance of satellite cells. Biomaterials 35, 9438–9446 (2014).
Google Scholar
Wang, Y. et al. Multiple effects of mechanical stretch on myogenic progenitor cells. Stem Cells Dev. 29, 336–352 (2020).
Google Scholar
Bursac, N., Juhas, M. & Rando, T. A. Synergizing engineering and biology to treat and model skeletal muscle injury and disease. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 17, 217–242 (2015).
Google Scholar
Vandenburgh, H. H. & Karlisch, P. Longitudinal growth of skeletal myotubes in vitro in a new horizontal mechanical cell stimulator. Vitr. Cell. Dev. Biol. 25, 607–616 (1989).
Google Scholar
Powell, C. A., Smiley, B. L., Mills, J. & Vandenburgh, H. H. Mechanical stimulation improves tissue-engineered human skeletal muscle. Am. J. Physiol. Physiol. 283, C1557–C1565 (2002).
Google Scholar
Candiani, G. et al. Cyclic mechanical stimulation favors myosin heavy chain accumulation in engineered skeletal muscle constructs. J. Appl. Biomater. Biomech. 8, 68–75 (2010).
Google Scholar
Moon, D. G., Christ, G., Stitzel, J. D., Atala, A. & Yoo, J. J. Cyclic mechanical preconditioning improves engineered muscle contraction. Tissue Eng. – Part A 14, 473–482 (2008).
Google Scholar
Pennisi, C. P., Olesen, C. G., De Zee, M., Rasmussen, J. & Zachar, V. Uniaxial cyclic strain drives assembly and differentiation of skeletal myocytes. Tissue Eng. – Part A 17, 2543–2550 (2011).
Google Scholar
Liao, I.-C., Liu, J. B., Bursac, N. & Leong, K. W. Effect of electromechanical stimulation on the maturation of myotubes on aligned electrospun fibers. Cell. Mol. Bioeng. 1, 133 (2008).
Google Scholar
Teramura, T. et al. Mechanical stimulation of cyclic tensile strain induces reduction of pluripotent related gene expressions via activation of Rho/ROCK and subsequent decreasing of AKT phosphorylation in human induced pluripotent stem cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 417, 836–841 (2012).
Google Scholar
Czaplewski, S. K., Tsai, T. L., Duenwald-Kuehl, S. E., Vanderby, R. & Li, W. J. Tenogenic differentiation of human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived mesenchymal stem cells dictated by properties of braided submicron fibrous scaffolds. Biomaterials 35, 6907–6917 (2014).
Google Scholar
Geuss, L. R. & Suggs, L. J. Making cardiomyocytes: How mechanical stimulation can influence differentiation of pluripotent stem cells. Biotechnol. Prog. 29, 1089–1096 (2013).
Google Scholar
Kok, H. P. et al. Heating technology for malignant tumors: a review. Int. J. Hyperth. 37, 711–741 (2020).
Google Scholar
Elhelf, I. A. S. et al. High intensity focused ultrasound: the fundamentals, clinical applications and research trends. Diagnostic Interventional Imaging 99, 349–359 (2018).
Google Scholar
Burks, S. R., Lorsung, R. M., Nagle, M. E., Tu, T. W. & Frank, J. A. Focused ultrasound activates voltage-gated calcium channels through depolarizing TRPC1 sodium currents in kidney and skeletal muscle. Theranostics 9, 5517–5531 (2019).
Google Scholar
Moncion, A. et al. Spatiotemporally-controlled transgene expression in hydroxyapatite-fibrin composite scaffolds using high intensity focused ultrasound. Biomaterials 194, 14–24 (2019).
Google Scholar
Jiang, X. et al. A review of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound for therapeutic applications. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 66, 2704–2718 (2019).
Google Scholar
Liu, D. D., Ullah, M., Concepcion, W., Dahl, J. J. & Thakor, A. S. The role of ultrasound in enhancing mesenchymal stromal cell-based therapies. Stem Cells Transl. Med 9, 850–866 (2020).
Google Scholar
Salgarella, A. R. et al. Optimal ultrasound exposure conditions for maximizing C2C12 muscle cell proliferation and differentiation. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 43, 1452–1465 (2017).
Google Scholar
Fontana, F. et al. Highly controlled and usable system for Low-Intensity Pulsed Ultrasound Stimulation of Cells. in Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society 2513–2516 (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), 2019).
Leskinen, J. J. & Hynynen, K. Study of factors affecting the magnitude and nature of ultrasound exposure with in vitro set-ups. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 38, 777–794 (2012).
Google Scholar
Shaw, A. & Ter Haar, G. R. Telling it like it is. J. Ther. Ultrasound 1, 1–2 (2013).
Cafarelli, A. et al. Piezoelectric nanomaterials activated by ultrasound: the pathway from discovery to future clinical adoption. ACS Nano 15, 11066–11086 (2021).
Google Scholar
Lv, Y., Zhao, P., Chen, G., Sha, Y. & Yang, L. Effects of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound on cell viability, proliferation and neural differentiation of induced pluripotent stem cells-derived neural crest stem cells. Biotechnol. Lett. 35, 2201–2212 (2013).
Google Scholar
Xia, B., Zou, Y., Xu, Z. & Lv, Y. Gene expression profiling analysis of the effects of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound on induced pluripotent stem cell-derived neural crest stem cells. Biotechnol. Appl. Biochem. 64, 927–937 (2017).
Google Scholar
Xia, B. et al. Low‐intensity pulsed ultrasound combination with induced pluripotent stem cells‐derived neural crest stem cells and growth differentiation factor 5 promotes sciatic nerve regeneration and functional recovery. J. Tissue Eng. Regen. Med. 13, 625–636 (2019).
Google Scholar
Morey-Holton, E. R. The impact of gravity on life. In Evolution on Planet Earth: The Impact of the Physical Environment 143–159 (Elsevier Ltd, 2003).
Clément, G. The Musculo-Skeletal System in Space. In Fundamentals of Space Medicine 181–216 (Springer Science & Business Media, 2011).
Cadena, S. M. et al. Skeletal muscle in MuRF1 null mice is not spared in low-gravity conditions, indicating atrophy proceeds by unique mechanisms in space. Sci. Rep. 9, (2019).
Slentz, D. H., Truskey, G. A. & Kraus, W. E. Effects of chronic exposure to simulated microgravity on skeletal muscle cell proliferation and differentiation. Vitr. Cell. Dev. Biol. – Anim. 37, 148–156 (2001).
Google Scholar
Zhou, J. et al. Real microgravity condition promoted regeneration capacity of induced pluripotent stem cells during the TZ‐1 space mission. Cell Prolif. 52, e12574 (2019).
Google Scholar
Wnorowski, A. et al. Effects of spaceflight on human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocyte structure and function. Stem cell Rep. 13, 960–969 (2019).
Google Scholar
Tominari, T. et al. Hypergravity and microgravity exhibited reversal effects on the bone and muscle mass in mice. Sci. Rep. 9, 1–10 (2019).
Google Scholar
Ciofani, G. et al. Hypergravity effects on myoblast proliferation and differentiation. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 113, 258–261 (2012).
Google Scholar
Acharya, A. et al. Modulation of differentiation processes in murine embryonic stem cells exposed to parabolic flight-induced acute hypergravity and microgravity. Stem Cells Dev. 27, 838–847 (2018).
Google Scholar
Dunn, A. et al. Biomaterial and stem cell‐based strategies for skeletal muscle regeneration. J. Orthop. Res. 37, 1246–1262 (2019).
Google Scholar
Discher, D. E., Janmey, P. & Wang, Y.-L. Tissue cells feel and respond to the stiffness of their substrate. Sci. (80-.) 310, 1139–1143 (2005).
Google Scholar
Gilbert, P. M. et al. Substrate elasticity regulates skeletal muscle stem cell self-renewal in culture. Science 329, 1078–1081 (2010).
Google Scholar
Iberite, F., Salerno, M., Canale, C., Rosa, A. & Ricotti, L. Influence of substrate stiffness on human induced pluripotent stem cells: preliminary results. In Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society 1039–1043 (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), 2019).
Ricotti, L. et al. Proliferation and skeletal myotube formation capability of C2C12 and H9c2 cells on isotropic and anisotropic electrospun nanofibrous PHB scaffolds. Biomed. Mater. 7, 035010 (2012).
Google Scholar
Xu, B. et al. Nanotopography-responsive myotube alignment and orientation as a sensitive phenotypic biomarker for Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy. Biomaterials 183, 54–66 (2018).
Google Scholar
Sakurai, H. et al. In vitro modeling of paraxial mesodermal progenitors derived from induced pluripotent stem cells. PLoS ONE 7, e47078 (2012).
Google Scholar
Hughes, C. S., Postovit, L. M. & Lajoie, G. A. Matrigel: a complex protein mixture required for optimal growth of cell culture. Proteomics 10, 1886–1890 (2010).
Google Scholar
Kim, J. H. et al. 3D bioprinted human skeletal muscle constructs for muscle function restoration. Sci. Rep. 8, 12307 (2018).
Google Scholar
Kim, J. H. et al. Neural cell integration into 3D bioprinted skeletal muscle constructs accelerates restoration of muscle function. Nat. Commun. 11, 1–12 (2020).
Khodabukus, A. & Baar, K. Regulating fibrinolysis to engineer skeletal muscle from the C2C12 cell line. Tissue Eng. – Part C. Methods 15, 501–511 (2009).
Google Scholar
Cvetkovic, C. et al. Investigating the life expectancy and proteolytic degradation of engineered skeletal muscle biological machines. Sci. Rep. 7, 1–13 (2017).
Google Scholar
Kang, H. W. et al. A 3D bioprinting system to produce human-scale tissue constructs with structural integrity. Nat. Biotechnol. 34, 312–319 (2016).
Google Scholar
Zhuang, P., An, J., Chua, C. K. & Tan, L. P. Bioprinting of 3D in vitro skeletal muscle models: A review. Mater. Des. 193, 108794 (2020).
Google Scholar
Agrawal, A., Raut, A., Bagde, A., Fulzele, P. & Quazi Syed, Z. A mini review on 3-D bioprinting in skeletal muscle tissue engineering. Mater. Today Proc. (2021).
Choi, Y. J. et al. A 3D cell printed muscle construct with tissue-derived bioink for the treatment of volumetric muscle loss. Biomaterials 206, 160–169 (2019).
Google Scholar
Jodat, Y. A. et al. hiPSC-derived 3D Bioprinted Skeletal Muscle Tissue Implants Regenerate Skeletal Muscle Following Volumetric Muscle Loss. Res. Sq. Preprint, (2021).
Pantelic, M. N. & Larkin, L. M. Stem cells for skeletal muscle tissue engineering. Tissue Eng. – Part B Rev. 24, 373–391 (2018).
Google Scholar
Kim, K. et al. Epigenetic memory in induced pluripotent stem cells. Nature 467, 285–290 (2010).
Google Scholar
Malik, N. & Rao, M. S. A review of the methods for human iPSC derivation. in Methods in Molecular Biology 997, 23–33 (NIH Public Access, 2013).
Huang, C.-Y. et al. Human iPSC banking: barriers and opportunities. J. Biomed. Sci. 26, 1–14 (2019).
De Almeida, P. E. et al. Transplanted terminally differentiated induced pluripotent stem cells are accepted by immune mechanisms similar to self-tolerance. Nat. Commun. 5, 3903 (2014).
Google Scholar
Hallett, P. J. et al. Successful function of autologous iPSC-derived dopamine neurons following transplantation in a non-human primate model of Parkinson’s disease. Cell Stem Cell 16, 269–274 (2015).
Google Scholar
Alvarez-Palomo, B. et al. Adapting cord blood collection and banking standard operating procedures for hla-homozygous induced pluripotent stem cells production and banking for clinical application. J. Clin. Med. 8, 476 (2019).
Google Scholar
Doss, M. X. & Sachinidis, A. Current challenges of iPSC-based disease modeling and therapeutic implications. Cells 8, 403 (2019).
Google Scholar
Deinsberger, J., Reisinger, D. & Weber, B. Global trends in clinical trials involving pluripotent stem cells: a systematic multi-database analysis. npj Regen. Med. 5, 1–13 (2020).
Sanjurjo-Rodríguez, C. et al. Versatility of induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) for improving the knowledge on musculoskeletal diseases. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 21, 1–28 (2020).
Han, W. M., Jang, Y. C. & García, A. J. Engineered matrices for skeletal muscle satellite cell engraftment and function. Matrix Biol. 60–61, 96–109 (2017).
Google Scholar
Giordani, L. et al. High-dimensional single-cell cartography reveals novel skeletal muscle-resident cell populations. Mol. Cell 74, 609–621.e6 (2019).
Google Scholar
Bolívar-Monsalve, E. J. et al. Continuous chaotic bioprinting of skeletal muscle-like constructs. Bioprinting 21, e00125 (2021).
Lee, H. et al. Self-aligned myofibers in 3D bioprinted extracellular matrix-based construct accelerate skeletal muscle function restoration. Appl. Phys. Rev. 8, 021405 (2021).
Google Scholar
Yang, G. H., Kim, W., Kim, J. & Kim, G. A skeleton muscle model using GelMA-based cell-aligned bioink processed with an electric-field assisted 3D/4D bioprinting. Theranostics 11, 48 (2021).
Google Scholar
Kim, W. et al. A bioprinting process supplemented with in situ electrical stimulation directly induces significant myotube formation and myogenesis. Adv. Funct. Mater. 31, 2105170 (2021).
Google Scholar
Bakht, S. M. et al. Engineering next-generation bioinks with nanoparticles: moving from reinforcement fillers to multifunctional nanoelements. J. Mater. Chem. B 9, 5025–5038 (2021).
Google Scholar
Waters, S. L., Schumacher, L. J. & El Haj, A. J. Regenerative medicine meets mathematical modelling: developing symbiotic relationships. npj Regen. Med 6, 1–8 (2021). 2021 61.
Zhu, Y. et al. Deep learning-based predictive identification of neural stem cell differentiation. Nat. Commun. 12, 1–13 (2021). 2021 121.
Google Scholar
Waisman, A. et al. Deep learning neural networks highly predict very early onset of pluripotent stem cell differentiation. Stem Cell Rep. 12, 845–859 (2019).
del Sol, A. & Jung, S. The importance of computational modeling in stem cell research. Trends Biotechnol. 39, 126–136 (2021).
Google Scholar
Thavandiran, N. et al. Functional arrays of human pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiac microtissues. Sci. Rep. 10, 1–13 (2020).
Ortiz-Catalan, M., Håkansson, B. & Brånemark, R. Real-time and simultaneous control of artificial limbs based on pattern recognition algorithms. IEEE Trans. NEURAL Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 22, (2014).
Parker, P., Englehart, K. & Hudgins, B. Myoelectric signal processing for control of powered limb prostheses. J. Electromyogr. Kinesiol. 16, 541–548 (2006).
Google Scholar
Kung, T. A. et al. Regenerative peripheral nerve interface viability and signal transduction with an implanted electrode. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 133, 1380–1394 (2014).
Google Scholar
Speck, N., Peeters, M. & Dzierzak, E. Development of the Vertebrate Hematopoietic System. in Mouse Development 191–210 (Elsevier, 2002).
Coultas, L., Chawengsaksophak, K. & Rossant, J. Endothelial cells and VEGF in vascular development. Nature 438, 937–945 (2005).
Google Scholar
De Val, S. Key transcriptional regulators of early vascular development. Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, Vasc. Biol. 31, 1469–1475 (2011).
Majesky, M. W. Developmental basis of vascular smooth muscle diversity. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 27, 1248–1258 (2007).
Google Scholar
Sinha, S., Iyer, D. & Granata, A. Embryonic origins of human vascular smooth muscle cells: Implications for in vitro modeling and clinical application. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 71, 2271–2288 (2014).
Google Scholar
Murray, I. R. et al. Skeletal and cardiac muscle pericytes: functions and therapeutic potential. Pharmacol. Therapeutics 171, 65–74 (2017).
Google Scholar
Armulik, A., Abramsson, A. & Betsholtz, C. Endothelial/pericyte interactions. Circulation Res 97, 512–523 (2005).
Google Scholar
Ozerdem, U., Grako, K. A., Dahlin-Huppe, K., Monosov, E. & Stallcup, W. B. NG2 proteoglycan is expressed exclusively by mural cells during vascular morphogenesis. Dev. Dyn. 222, 218–227 (2001).
Google Scholar
Bitto, F. F. et al. Myogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells in a newly developed neurotised AV-loop model. Biomed Res. Int. 2013, 935046 (2013).
Rosa, S. et al. Functional characterization of ipsC-derived arterial-and venous-like endothelial cells. Sci. Rep. 9, 1–15 (2019).
Gholobova, D. et al. Endothelial network formation within human tissue-engineered skeletal muscle. Tissue Eng. Part A 21, 2548–2558 (2015).
Google Scholar
Beach, R. L., Rao, J. S. & Festoff, B. W. Extracellular-matrix synthesis by skeletal muscle in culture. Major secreted collagenous protein of clonal myoblasts. Biochem. J. 225, 619–627 (1985).
Google Scholar
Brent, A. E., Braun, T. & Tabin, C. J. Genetic analysis of interactions between the somitic muscle, cartilage and tendon cell lineages during mouse development. Development 132, 515–528 (2005).
Google Scholar
Chang, Y., Li, H. & Guo, Z. Mesenchymal stem cell-like properties in fibroblasts. Cell. Physiol. Biochem. 34, 703–714 (2014).
Google Scholar
Chapman, M. A., Meza, R. & Lieber, R. L. Skeletal muscle fibroblasts in health and disease. Differentiation 92, 108–115 (2016).
Google Scholar
Sefton, E. M. & Kardon, G. Connecting muscle development, birth defects, and evolution: An essential role for muscle connective tissue. in Current Topics in Developmental Biology 132, 137–176 (Academic Press Inc., 2019).
Biferali, B., Proietti, D., Mozzetta, C. & Madaro, L. Fibro–adipogenic progenitors cross-talk in skeletal muscle: the social network. Front. Physiol. 10, 1074 (2019).
Google Scholar
Wosczyna, M. N. et al. Mesenchymal stromal cells are required for regeneration and homeostatic maintenance of skeletal muscle. Cell Rep. 27, 2029–2035.e5 (2019).
Google Scholar
Joe, A. W. B. et al. Muscle injury activates resident fibro/adipogenic progenitors that facilitate myogenesis. Nat. Cell Biol. 12, 153–163 (2010).
Google Scholar
Nassari, S., Duprez, D. & Fournier-Thibault, C. Non-myogenic contribution to muscle development and homeostasis: The role of connective tissues. Front. Cell Developmental Biol. 5, 22 (2017).
Dennis, R. G. & Kosnik II, P. E. Excitability and isometric contractile properties of mammalian skeletal muscle constructs engineered in vitro. In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology – Animal 36, 327–335 (2000).
Google Scholar
Li, M., Dickinson, C. E., Finkelstein, E. B., Neville, C. M. & Sundback, C. A. The role of fibroblasts in self-assembled skeletal muscle. Tissue Eng. – Part A 17, 2641–2650 (2011).
Google Scholar
Mackey, A. L., Magnan, M., Chazaud, B. & Kjaer, M. Human skeletal muscle fibroblasts stimulate in vitro myogenesis and in vivo muscle regeneration. J. Physiol. 595, 5115–5127 (2017).
Google Scholar
Thummarati, P. & Kino-oka, M. Effect of co-culturing fibroblasts in human skeletal muscle cell sheet on angiogenic cytokine balance and angiogenesis. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 8, 1121 (2020).
Murchison, N. D. et al. Regulation of tendon differentiation by scleraxis distinguishes force-transmitting tendons from muscle-anchoring tendons. Development 134, 2697–2708 (2007).
Google Scholar
Brent, A. E. & Tabin, C. J. Developmental regulation of somite derivatives: muscle, cartilage and tendon. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 12, 548–557 (2002).
Google Scholar
Chen, C. M. A., Kraut, N., Groudine, M. & Weintraub, H. I-mf, a novel myogenic repressor, interacts with members of the MyoD family. Cell 86, 731–741 (1996).
Google Scholar
Wayburn, B. & Volk, T. LRT, a tendon-specific leucine-rich repeat protein, promotes muscle-tendon targeting through its interaction with Robo. Development 136, 3607–3615 (2009).
Google Scholar
Huang, A. H. et al. Repositioning forelimb superficialis muscles: tendon attachment and muscle activity enable active relocation of functional myofibers. Dev. Cell 26, 544–551 (2013).
Google Scholar
Valdivia, M., Vega-Macaya, F. & Olguín, P. Mechanical control of myotendinous junction formation and tendon differentiation during development. Front. cell Dev. Biol. 5, 26 (2017).
Google Scholar
Larkin, L. M., Calve, S., Kostrominova, T. Y. & Arruda, E. M. Structure and functional evaluation of tendon-skeletal muscle constructs engineered in vitro. Tissue Eng. 12, 3149–3158 (2006).
Google Scholar
Laternser, S. et al. A novel microplate 3D bioprinting platform for the engineering of muscle and tendon tissues. SLAS Technol. 23, 599–613 (2018).
Google Scholar
Laine, J. et al. Development of the excitation-contraction coupling machinery and its relation to myofibrillogenesis in human iPSC-derived skeletal myocytes. Skelet. Muscle 8, 1 (2018).
Google Scholar
Osaki, T., Uzel, S. G. M. M. M. & Kamm, R. D. Microphysiological 3D model of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) from human iPS-derived muscle cells and optogenetic motor neurons. Sci. Adv. 4, eaat5847 (2018).
Google Scholar
Lin, C.-Y. et al. iPSC-derived functional human neuromuscular junctions model the pathophysiology of neuromuscular diseases. JCI insight 4, e124299 (2019).
Google Scholar
Demestre, M. et al. Formation and characterisation of neuromuscular junctions between hiPSC derived motoneurons and myotubes. Stem Cell Res. 15, 328–336 (2015).
Google Scholar
Mazaleyrat, K. et al. Multilineage differentiation for formation of innervated skeletal muscle fibers from healthy and diseased human pluripotent stem cells. Cells 9, 1531 (2020).
Google Scholar
Sato, Y. et al. TFEB overexpression promotes glycogen clearance of Pompe disease iPSC-derived skeletal muscle. Mol. Ther. Methods Clin. Dev. 3, 16054 (2016).
Google Scholar
Wu, J., Hunt, S. D., Xue, H., Liu, Y. & Darabi, R. Generation and Characterization of a MYF5 Reporter Human iPS Cell Line Using CRISPR/Cas9 Mediated Homologous Recombination. 6, (2016).
Gilbert, S. & Barresi, M. J. F. Developmental Biology, Eleventh Edition. (Sinauer Associates, Inc., 2016).
