Cooper, G. M. Parlez-vous VUS? Genome Res. 25, 1423–1426 (2015).
Google Scholar
Starita, L. M. et al. Variant interpretation: functional assays to the rescue. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 101, 315–325 (2017).
Google Scholar
Fowler, D. M. & Fields, S. Deep mutational scanning: a new style of protein science. Nat. Methods 11, 801–807 (2014).
Google Scholar
Majithia, A. R. et al. Prospective functional classification of all possible missense variants in PPARG. Nat. Genet. 48, 1570–1575 (2016).
Google Scholar
Sun, S. et al. A proactive genotype-to-patient-phenotype map for cystathionine beta-synthase. Genome Med. 12, 13 (2020).
Google Scholar
Findlay, G. M., Boyle, E. A., Hause, R. J., Klein, J. C. & Shendure, J. Saturation editing of genomic regions by multiplex homology-directed repair. Nature 513, 120–123 (2014).
Google Scholar
Findlay, G. M. et al. Accurate classification of BRCA1 variants with saturation genome editing. Nature 562, 217–222 (2018).
Google Scholar
Meitlis, I. et al. Multiplexed functional assessment of genetic variants in CARD11. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 107, 1029–1043 (2020).
Google Scholar
Kweon, J. et al. A CRISPR-based base-editing screen for the functional assessment of BRCA1 variants. Oncogene 39, 30–35 (2020).
Google Scholar
Hanna, R. E. et al. Massively parallel assessment of human variants with base editor screens. Cell 184, 1064–1080 e1020 (2021).
Google Scholar
Huang, C., Li, G., Wu, J., Liang, J. & Wang, X. Identification of pathogenic variants in cancer genes using base editing screens with editing efficiency correction. Genome Biol. 22, 80 (2021).
Google Scholar
Anzalone, A. V. et al. Search-and-replace genome editing without double-strand breaks or donor DNA. Nature 576, 149–157 (2019).
Google Scholar
Carette, J. E. et al. Haploid genetic screens in human cells identify host factors used by pathogens. Science 326, 1231–1235 (2009).
Google Scholar
Vanier, M. T. Niemann–Pick disease type C. Orphanet J. Rare Dis. 5, 16 (2010).
Google Scholar
Wassif, C. A. et al. High incidence of unrecognized visceral/neurological late-onset Niemann–Pick disease, type C1, predicted by analysis of massively parallel sequencing data sets. Genet. Med. 18, 41–48 (2016).
Google Scholar
Lin, Y. C. et al. Genome dynamics of the human embryonic kidney 293 lineage in response to cell biology manipulations. Nat. Commun. 5, 4767 (2014).
Google Scholar
Hsu, P. D. et al. DNA targeting specificity of RNA-guided Cas9 nucleases. Nat. Biotechnol. 31, 827–832 (2013).
Google Scholar
Cong, L. et al. Multiplex genome engineering using CRISPR/Cas systems. Science 339, 819–823 (2013).
Google Scholar
Wu, X. et al. Genome-wide binding of the CRISPR endonuclease Cas9 in mammalian cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 32, 670–676 (2014).
Google Scholar
Duan, J. et al. Genome-wide identification of CRISPR/Cas9 off-targets in human genome. Cell Res. 24, 1009–1012 (2014).
Google Scholar
Rose, J. C. et al. Suppression of unwanted CRISPR–Cas9 editing by co-administration of catalytically inactivating truncated guide RNAs. Nat. Commun. 11, 2697 (2020).
Google Scholar
Coelho, M. A. et al. CRISPR GUARD protects off-target sites from Cas9 nuclease activity using short guide RNAs. Nat. Commun. 11, 4132 (2020).
Google Scholar
Kopitz, J., Gerhard, C., Hofler, P. & Cantz, M. [14C]Methylamine accumulation in cultured human skin fibroblasts—a biochemical test for lysosomal storage and lysosomal diseases. Clin. Chim. Acta 227, 121–133 (1994).
Google Scholar
Lachmann, R. H. et al. Treatment with miglustat reverses the lipid-trafficking defect in Niemann–Pick disease type C. Neurobiol. Dis. 16, 654–658 (2004).
Google Scholar
te Vruchte, D. et al. Relative acidic compartment volume as a lysosomal storage disorder-associated biomarker. J. Clin. Invest. 124, 1320–1328 (2014).
Xu, M. et al. A phenotypic compound screening assay for lysosomal storage diseases. J. Biomol. Screen. 19, 168–175 (2014).
Google Scholar
Millat, G. et al. Niemann–Pick C1 disease: the I1061T substitution is a frequent mutant allele in patients of Western European descent and correlates with a classic juvenile phenotype. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 65, 1321–1329 (1999).
Google Scholar
Millat, G. et al. Niemann–Pick C1 disease: correlations between NPC1 mutations, levels of NPC1 protein, and phenotypes emphasize the functional significance of the putative sterol-sensing domain and of the cysteine-rich luminal loop. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 68, 1373–1385 (2001).
Google Scholar
Dardis, A. et al. Molecular genetics of Niemann–Pick type C disease in Italy: an update on 105 patients and description of 18 NPC1 novel variants. J. Clin. Med. 9, 3 (2020).
Anzalone, A. V., Koblan, L. W. & Liu, D. R. Genome editing with CRISPR-Cas nucleases, base editors, transposases and prime editors. Nat. Biotechnol. 38, 824–844 (2020).
Google Scholar
Kim, H. K. et al. Predicting the efficiency of prime editing guide RNAs in human cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 39, 198–206 (2021).
Google Scholar
Dougherty, M. et al. Genome sequencing in a case of Niemann–Pick type C. Cold Spring Harb. Mol. Case Stud. 2, a001222 (2016).
Google Scholar
Sevin, M. et al. The adult form of Niemann–Pick disease type C. Brain 130, 120–133 (2007).
Google Scholar
Greenberg, C. R., Barnes, J. G., Kogan, S. & Seargeant, L. E. A rare case of Niemann–Pick disease type C without neurological involvement in a 66-year-old patient. Mol. Genet. Metab. Rep. 3, 18–20 (2015).
Google Scholar
Rentzsch, P., Witten, D., Cooper, G. M., Shendure, J. & Kircher, M. CADD: predicting the deleteriousness of variants throughout the human genome. Nucleic Acids Res. 47, D886–D894 (2019).
Google Scholar
Gelsthorpe, M. E. et al. Niemann–Pick type C1 I1061T mutant encodes a functional protein that is selected for endoplasmic reticulum-associated degradation due to protein misfolding. J. Biol. Chem. 283, 8229–8236 (2008).
Google Scholar
Zampieri, S., Bembi, B., Rosso, N., Filocamo, M. & Dardis, A. Treatment of human fibroblasts carrying NPC1 missense mutations with MG132 leads to an improvement of intracellular cholesterol trafficking. JIMD Rep. 2, 59–69 (2012).
Google Scholar
Watari, H. et al. Mutations in the leucine zipper motif and sterol-sensing domain inactivate the Niemann–Pick C1 glycoprotein. J. Biol. Chem. 274, 21861–21866 (1999).
Google Scholar
Kuchenbaecker, K. B. et al. Risks of breast, ovarian, and contralateral breast cancer for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. JAMA 317, 2402–2416 (2017).
Google Scholar
Olopade, O. I. & Artioli, G. Efficacy of risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy in women with BRCA-1 and BRCA-2 mutations. Breast J. 10, S5–S9 (2004).
Google Scholar
Rebbeck, T. R. et al. Bilateral prophylactic mastectomy reduces breast cancer risk in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers: the PROSE Study Group. J. Clin. Oncol. 22, 1055–1062 (2004).
Google Scholar
Labun, K. et al. CHOPCHOP v3: expanding the CRISPR web toolbox beyond genome editing. Nucleic Acids Res. 47, W171–W174 (2019).
Google Scholar
Hart, S. N. et al. Comprehensive annotation of BRCA1 and BRCA2 missense variants by functionally validated sequence-based computational prediction models. Genet. Med. 21, 71–80 (2019).
Google Scholar
Paquet, D. et al. Efficient introduction of specific homozygous and heterozygous mutations using CRISPR/Cas9. Nature 533, 125–129 (2016).
Google Scholar
Liu, Y. et al. Enhancing prime editing by Csy4-mediated processing of pegRNA. Cell Res. 31, 1134–1136 (2021).
Google Scholar
Nelson, J. W. et al. Engineered pegRNAs improve prime editing efficiency. Nat. Biotechnol. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-021-01039-7 (2021).
Kweon, J. et al. Engineered prime editors with PAM flexibility. Mol. Ther. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymthe.2021.02.022 (2021).
Liu, P. et al. Improved prime editors enable pathogenic allele correction and cancer modelling in adult mice. Nat. Commun. 12, 2121 (2021).
Google Scholar
Hua, K., Jiang, Y., Tao, X. & Zhu, J. K. Precision genome engineering in rice using prime editing system. Plant Biotechnol. J. 18, 2167–2169 (2020).
Google Scholar
Erwood, S. et al. Modeling Niemann–Pick disease type C in a human haploid cell line allows for patient variant characterization and clinical interpretation. Genome Res. 29, 2010–2019 (2019).
Google Scholar
Kowarz, E., Loscher, D. & Marschalek, R. Optimized Sleeping Beauty transposons rapidly generate stable transgenic cell lines. Biotechnol. J. 10, 647–653 (2015).
Google Scholar
Koblan, L. W. et al. Improving cytidine and adenine base editors by expression optimization and ancestral reconstruction. Nat. Biotechnol. 36, 843–846 (2018).
Google Scholar
Walton, R. T., Christie, K. A., Whittaker, M. N. & Kleinstiver, B. P. Unconstrained genome targeting with near-PAMless engineered CRISPR-Cas9 variants. Science 368, 290–296 (2020).
Google Scholar
Ran, F. A. et al. Genome engineering using the CRISPR–Cas9 system. Nat. Protoc. 8, 2281–2308 (2013).
Google Scholar
Wickham, H. ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis (Springer-Verlag, 2016).
Kluesner, M. G. et al. EditR: a method to quantify base editing from Sanger sequencing. CRISPR J. 1, 239–250 (2018).
Google Scholar
Robinson, J. T. et al. Integrative genomics viewer. Nat. Biotechnol. 29, 24–26 (2011).
Google Scholar
Comaniciu, D. & Meer, P. Mean shift: a robust approach toward feature space analysis. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 24, 603–619 (2002).
Pedregosa, F. et al. Scikit-learn: machine learning in Python. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 12, 2825–2830 (2011).
Chernick, M. R. Bootstrap Methods: A Guide for Practitioners and Researchers Vol. 619 (John Wiley & Sons, 2011).
Chung, N. C. Statistical significance of cluster membership for unsupervised evaluation of cell identities. Bioinformatics 36, 3107–3114 (2020).
Google Scholar
Henderson, A. R. The bootstrap: a technique for data-driven statistics. Using computer-intensive analyses to explore experimental data. Clin. Chim. Acta 359, 1–26 (2005).
Google Scholar
