In vitro antioxidant extracts evaluation from the residue of the Hevea brasiliensis seed

Antioxidant activity of extracts using different extraction methods

Table 2 shows the data referring to the mean antioxidant activity of the tests at times of 2, 4, and 6 h, for all extracting solvents and the extraction methods with the t-test application, for comparison of means.

The t test was used to compare the test means for different solvents. Thus, all tests performed with the aqueous solvent and the other solvents were compared, as the aqueous extract was the one that presented the highest average of antioxidant activity. Thus, the t test shows no statistical difference between the solvent water and ethanol for the infusion method. Concerning water and hexane and water and methanol, there was a significant difference.

In the soxhlet method, the water solvent presents a significant difference when compared to all other solvents. Thus, water can be suggested as the best solvent, regardless of the extraction system used, since the average results were higher for this solvent, which is relevant for the study. It is justifiable that aqueous extracts have more significant evolutions since most antioxidant compounds, such as phenolics and flavonoids, are polar, having greater solubility in water. Hence, the extraction with this solvent is more effective. Also, according to Mokrani and Madani³³, the solubility of phenolic compounds is established according to the polarity of the solvent. That is, each solvent extracts a mixture of phenolic compounds. Flavonoids, for example, are extracted mainly by water, ethanol, or ethyl acetate.

Vizzotto and Pereira³⁴ tested solvents with little (hexane) and higher polarity (acetone, methanol, and ethanol). The results obtained by the authors corroborate that less polar solvents presented the lowest effects for the extraction of phenolic compounds, in this case, blackberry. On the contrary, polar solvents were more effective in extracting polyphenols.

Polyphenols and flavonoids can interact whit the DPPH radical by electron ou hydrogen transfer mechanism. The radical specie promotes the homolytic breaking of the H–O bond and generating radicals from polyphenols and flavonoids. The new radicals are stabilized by electronic delocalization along with the aromatic units, interrupting the radical reaction propagation step²⁷.

Another observed relationship was temperature since the solvent that came closest to water in terms of antioxidant activity was ethanol (Table 2), which also has a specific polarity and a relatively high boiling point compared to other solvents. It can be suggested high temperatures contribute to the extraction. And several studies have shown results in which elevated temperatures favor the extraction of antioxidant compounds^{35,36,37,38,39}.

Regarding the extraction method, according to the t test results, there was a significant difference between Soxhlet and infusion, and the first one presented extracts with a greater antioxidant capacity compared to the infusion results. From the data described in Table 2, it is possible to observe for the two extraction methods, considering the same time, the highest percentage of DPPH capture occurred in the high concentrations of rubber tree seed bagasse, except hexane, which for both methods only showed efficiency for the infusion method at the extraction time of 2 h, with concentrations of 20 and 40 g L⁻¹.

The most notable advantages of the soxhlet method are the non-permanent contact of the sample with the solvent, constant renewal, avoiding solvent saturation, and the system temperature remains relatively high, as the heat applied to the evaporation process is continuous. These advantages contribute to higher antioxidant rates extracted in the soxhlet method than the infusion method, which is static and not isothermal^{35,36,37,38,39}.

Optimization of the experimental condition with the highest percentage of DPPH capture

From the conditions established in the first experimental design and the application of the t test to verify the significant difference of samples from solvents and extraction methods, it was found that the best antioxidant activity occurred using water extraction in Soxhlet. Therefore, from the extracts obtained in this condition, the response surface and the contour line graphs presented in Fig. 1a,b were calculated, seeking the pre-optimization of the performed points.

From Fig. 1b, which presents the contour lines, it is possible to observe a tendency to the optimum is using the extraction time from 4 h and extract concentration greater than 40 g L⁻¹. In this perspective, according to the response surface to describe the model, Eq. (6) was considered of the quadratic type suggested in the analysis. The ANOVA values are shown in Table 3.

In the validation process of the model equation for the response surface, the percentage of maximum variation explained by the quadratic equation corresponded to R = 99.79%, while the obtained variance presented R² = 97.98%, allowing a predictive capacity with relation to the trend of the experimental points for the set of variables considered in the experiment.

Another aspect considered is the statistical significance presented by the values F_R = 48.52 and F_la = 5.76 for the reference for the percentage of the F 5% distribution, corresponding to 5.05 and 19.16 respectively, the first being much higher and the second smallest about the value of F_R and F_la obtained in the model³².

The graph presented in Fig. 2 describes the random dispersion of the residuals, concluding that the quadratic equation used to represent the response surface according to the conditions used does not follow a trend. Therefore, a second analysis was performed looking for the path of the improved condition to obtain a greater antioxidant capacity of the extract from the aqueous solution using the Soxhlet system^24,40,41,42.

From the results obtained in the first response surface, the path to the optimum happened through the second experimental design with the same time values but increased concentrations to 70, 85, and 100 g L⁻¹. According to the methodology described for the generated response surface, data analysis is presented in Fig. 3a and the contour lines graph in Fig. 3b.

The result for the best antioxidant activity of the rubber tree seed bagasse present in the extract corresponded to 85 g L⁻¹, with an extraction time of 4 h. Under these conditions, the percentage of antioxidant activity via DPPH capture was 37.73 ± 1 0.69%. The fact that the highest antioxidant capacity value is obtained for an intermediate concentration can be explained by the extraction method, which consists of a purely physical process, with no chemical reaction in getting the extract, that is, the extractive release process by the penetration of the solvent into the plant matrix is one of the determining factors in the extraction⁴³. Therefore, one of the hypotheses is that the increase of the vegetal matrix above the concentration of 85 g L⁻¹ may have affected the penetration of the solvent and, consequently, decreasing the concentration of antioxidant compounds.

Also, regarding the second planning, the ANOVA results are shown in Table 4, and Eq. (7) describes the quadratic model for the behavior of data according to the variables in the analysis.

In the model validation for the response surface, R² showed 83.60% confidence, while the maximum variation reached 99.37%. In this context, the other parameters were evaluated, seeking greater reliability in predicting the results. Regarding the F_R and F_la values, the values found corresponded to 5.10 and 16.59. Thus, considering the percentage of the F distribution equal to 5%, these values show statistical significance.

The last parameter considered the residue scatter plot (Fig. 4), where random behavior was observed. Therefore, from the evaluation carried out, it is possible to conclude that the second model presents an adjustment to the variables selected for the analysis but with lower reliability when compared to the first planning.

According to Sousa³¹, percentages lower than 50% of DPPH free radical capture are classified as weak antioxidant activity. Therefore, considering that the highest percentage of DPPH capture achieved in the second planning was 37.73%, the extracts produced with the seed of Hevea brasiliensis have weak antioxidant activity. However, it is essential to highlight that the substrate used to carry out the extracts is the coproduct of this tree seed.

About the literature, the study by Zain et al.⁴⁴ found a value of 34.84% of DPPH free radical capture for methanol extract of seeds of the RRIM 2025 rubber tree clone Hevea brasiliensis. Machado et al.²² found for Garcinia cochinchinensis Choisy fruit extracts 90.6 ± 2.52% of DPPH capture. Bryan-Thomas⁴⁵ found 46.24% of antioxidant activity for M. zapota extract and 9.39% for A. muricata extract. Bispo et al.⁴⁶ evaluated the antioxidant capacity of coffee wood extracts, and the Catuaí variety showed the best results, with 34.5% of DPPH sequestration. Pereira et al.⁴⁷ evaluated the antioxidant profile of a mixed juice containing kale (Brassica oleracea L.), yam (Dioscorea spp.), and orange (Citrus sinensis) and presented a sequestration percentage of 94.81%. Da Silva Acácio et al.⁴⁸ found a percentage of 84.89% of DPPH free radical capture for the extract of Melochia tomentosa L. at a concentration of 75 μg mL⁻¹.

The antioxidant activity of rubber tree seed bagasse is weak but has higher or similar values than some other matrices, being those seeds and fruits. Considering there are no reports in the literature of using this material as an antioxidant and the low cost of acquiring the raw material because it is derived from an oil extraction process, the indices found are satisfactory and promising, adding value in the production chain.

Determination of the total phenolics and flavonoids concentration

Total phenolics and flavonoids from the first planning

The evaluation of the total phenolic concentration is shown in Fig. 5, where the different methods, solvents, and concentrations were analyzed according to each extraction time.

Compared with other works performed in the literature on the species, the content of total phenolic compounds is satisfactory, although there are no studies that analyze the antioxidant potential of Hevea brasiliensis seed bagasse. The extracts in this study reached 7201.32 mg of gallic acid equivalents 100 g⁻¹ (mg GAE 100 g⁻¹) in the aqueous extract in the Soxhlet, in the concentration of 20 g L⁻¹ and 4 h of extraction, while Agbai et al.⁴⁹ found for the sample of raw rubber seed meal Hevea brasiliensis (RRSM) a content of phenolic compounds of 2.77 ± 0.06 mg GAE g⁻¹. Ismun et al.⁵⁰ determined the polyphenol content in Hevea brasiliensis latex serum C and in the effluent for rubber processing, finding a 0.0393 g GAE mL⁻¹ in latex serum C and a content of 0.0099 g GAE mL⁻¹ in the effluent. Zain et al.⁴⁴ found content of 0.010 mg GAE mL⁻¹ of phenolic compounds for the methanol extract of seeds of the rubber tree clone RRIM 2025 Hevea brasiliensis.

Concerning other studies with different matrices, Sarkis²³ obtained 690 mg GAE 100 g⁻¹ of total phenolics for pecan extract, using a water/ethanol solution as solvent (20:80, v/v). Wang et al.²⁴ found 92.96 ± 1.47 mg of GAE g⁻¹ of phenolic compounds for nutshell ethanol extracts. Da Silva et al.²¹ evaluated the total phenols for jilo extracted with different solvents, and the optimized result was 830.6 ± 16.2 mg GAE 100 g⁻¹ with extraction with 20% methanol/water (v/v). Alasalvar and Bolling²⁰ obtained a total of 112–310 mg 100 g⁻¹ for Brazil nuts, 137–274 mg 100 g⁻¹ for cashew, 47–418 mg 100 g⁻¹ for almonds, 46–156 mg 100 g⁻¹ for Macadamia and 1285–2016 mg 100 g⁻¹ for Pecan nut. Machado et al.²² found extracts (with 80% acetone) of the pulp of Garcinia cochinchinensis Choisy a total phenolic content of 469.6 ± 114.9 mg gallic acid 100 g⁻¹, and in leaves 3739.7 ± 310.5 mg gallic acid 100 g⁻¹.

According to Assis et al.⁵¹, phenolic compounds, particularly phenolic acids, are found mainly in higher polarity extracts. They investigated the extraction of phenolic compounds from the microalgae Spirulina platensis and Chlorella pyrenoidosa with methanol and ethanol solvents, and the methanol extracts from the two microalgae showed higher content of phenolic compounds (MES (methanolic extracts of Spirulina) = 2.62 mg GAE g⁻¹; MEC (methanolic extracts of Chlorella) = 0.69 mg GAE g⁻¹) compared to ethanol extracts (EES (ethanolic extracts of Spirulina) = 1.37 mg GAE g⁻¹; EEC (ethanolic extracts of Chlorella.) = 0.41 mg GAE g⁻¹). Manivannan et al.⁵² studied methanol, diethyl ether, and hexane solvents to extract phenolic compounds from the microalgae Chlorella marina and obtained the best results for methanol extracts (0.64 mg GAE g⁻¹). Hajimahmoodi et al.⁵³ found for Chlorella vulgaris, 3.69–19.14 (mg GAE g⁻¹) for the aqueous fraction, 0.02–3.59 (mg GAE g⁻¹) for the aceto-ethyl fraction and 0.02–0.49 (mg GAE g⁻¹) for the hexane fraction. These results corroborate the results presented, which indicated the polar solvents extracted more phenolic compounds.

Figure 6 shows the different methods, solvents, and concentrations analyzed according to each extraction time to flavonoids.

According to the results obtained, the maximum concentration of total flavonoids was extracted using the soxhlet method in 4 h and with the ethanol solvent, reaching 8290.52 mg of rutin 100 g⁻¹. For the aqueous extract, the best extraction method was Soxhlet at a concentration of 20 g L⁻¹ and 2 h, with a value of 471.23 mg of rutin 100 g⁻¹. The extract from the first planning, which showed more significant activity in DPPH capture (4 h of extraction, Soxhlet, 60 g L⁻¹, water as solvent), has a significantly higher concentration of phenolic compounds (4241.67 mg GAE 100 g⁻¹) in the composition of the extract compared to the concentration of flavonoids (254.92 mg of rutin 100 g⁻¹). Thus, the capture of DPPH was almost exclusively due to the activity of phenolic compounds. The phenolic compounds obtained during plant extracts have different structures, such as phenolic acids, coumarins derivatives, tannins, and flavonoids⁵⁴.

It is possible to verify, in the present work, flavonoid quantification results superior to those of Agbai et al.⁴⁹, which were obtained for the sample of raw rubber seed meal (RRSM) Hevea brasiliensis a flavonoid content of 60.00 ± 3.53 mg quercertin 100 g⁻¹. Zain et al.⁴⁴ found 0.200 mg of catechin mL⁻¹ for methanol extract with leaves of the rubber tree clone RRIM 3001 Hevea brasiliensis. Nevertheless, it did not find flavonoids for methanol extracts with rubber tree clone seeds. Gullón et al.²⁵ presented for purple corn Zea mays L. 18.6 mg of rutin g⁻¹ of flavonoids. Rico et al.²⁶ found a flavonoid content of peanut shell self-hydrolysis liqueurs of 10.30 mg of rutin.g⁻¹ of raw material. Machado et al.²² presented for Garcinia cochinchinensis Choisy leaf extract a flavonoid content of 665.1 ± 122.9 mg of rutin 100 g⁻¹. The presence of flavonoids is an indication of the improvement in antioxidant activity⁵⁵. However, as the rubber tree seed pomace is a complex matrix, synergistic activity could happen between the antioxidant compounds.

Using the t test to verify the statistical difference in the concentration of phenols and flavonoids, the extraction methods using infusion and Soxhlet with aqueous solvent were considered, at concentrations 40 g L⁻¹ and 60 g L⁻¹, these tests being related to the higher DPPH values found in Table 2. The results showed that the extraction methods do not differ statistically for the contents of phenols and flavonoids for these conditions. However, for the latter, in the soxhlet system, the difference was significant between the concentrations (p = 0.0169). For the concentration of 60 g L⁻¹, the average was higher, corroborating the choice for the development of the second planning, the increase in concentrations.

Total phenolics and flavonoids from second planning

Afterward, a second analysis was performed from the condition that showed the best antioxidant activity, corresponding to 85 g L⁻¹ and the concentration of 100 g L⁻¹. At this concentration, the phenolic compounds content was 1405.17 mg GAE 100 g⁻¹, and the flavonoid content 223.34 mg 100 g⁻¹. Statistically, differences were found between the content of phenols (p = 0.024) and flavonoids (p = 0.0013). For both compounds, the content was higher in the experiment containing 85 g L⁻¹ and 4 h of extraction, which is correlated with the antioxidant capacity data using the DPPH. As in the initial planning, the phenols content was higher than flavonoids, following the same behavior already demonstrated, suggesting that the antioxidant capacity is linked to the phenols content or synergism of the compounds in the sample.

Pearson correlation

Person correlation tests were performed to verify the existence of a linear correlation between the variables and results obtained for each solvent. In this way, the Pearson correlation for aqueous solvent is shown in Table 5.

As shown in Table 5, most variables do not demonstrate a linear correlation with the results of flavonoids and phenolics for the aqueous extract, except for the % DPPH capture, which showed a median and positive correlation statistically significant with the variables method and concentration. These results indicate that the Soxhlet method contributes to the greater extraction of antioxidant compounds responsible for capturing free radicals or their non-degradation. By this method, the solvent does not come into contact with the sample at the boiling temperature. This ability to neutralize free radicals cannot be related to phenolic compounds or phenols by this analysis. Pearson’s correlation analysis was also performed for the methanol extract, and the results are shown in Table 6.

In Table 6, as well as in the aqueous extract, the methanol solvent extract presented a linear correlation with the result of % DPPH capture, which is a statistically significant, high, and positive correlation with the employed method. For this extract, it was also observed that the Soxhlet method contributes to the increase in DPPH capture. This ability to neutralize free radicals can be related to phenolic compounds by this analysis, as there was a statistically significant and positive correlation between % DPPH capture and the amount of phenols. Table 7 shows the results of the Pearson correlation for the extract obtained in the ethanol solvent.

There is a linear correlation between the extraction method and the amount of phenols for the ethanol solvent, and this correlation is statistically significant, positive, and intermediate level. This result indicates that the Soxhlet method amplifies the amount of phenols extracted by this solvent, enhancing the antioxidant capacity. Also, Table 8 shows the Pearson correlation for the hexane extract.

According to the Pearson correlation statistical test for the hexane solvent, the only statistically significant linear correlation was phenols with concentration. There is a minimization of the amount of phenols when increasing the study concentration, indicating that hexane is not the ideal solvent for extracting phenolic compounds for this biomass.

Physicochemical characterization of the extract: density and hydrogenic potential

The physicochemical analyzes were carried out considering the extract with the most significant antioxidant potential was the aqueous extract at the concentration of 85 g L⁻¹, in a time of 4 h. For the sample, the pH and density (ρ) values reached 6.21 and 0.999 g mL⁻¹, respectively, at a temperature of 25 °C, values close to those found in the literature for similar plant species. For example, Cardoso et al.⁵⁶ found pH indices for aqueous extracts of Brazil nuts of 6.34 without preservatives and 5.87 with added preservatives.