Pichler, P.-P. et al. Reducing urban greenhouse gas footprints. Sci. Rep. 7, 14659. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-15303-x (2017).
Google Scholar
Paul, M. & Bussemaker, M. J. A web-based geographic interface system to support decision making for municipal solid waste management in England. J. Clean. Prod. 263, 121461 (2020).
Google Scholar
Radwan, N., Khan, N. A. & Elmanfaloty, R. A. G. Optimization of solid waste collection using RSM approach, and strategies delivering sustainable development goals (SDG’s) in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. Sci. Rep. 11, 16612. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-96210-0 (2021).
Google Scholar
Afroz, R., Hanaki, K. & Tudin, R. Factors affecting waste generation: A study in a waste management program in Dhaka City, Bangladesh. Environ. Monit. Assess. 179, 509–519 (2011).
Google Scholar
Abanades, S. et al. A critical review of biogas production and usage with legislations framework across the globe. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 19, 3377–3400. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-021-03301-6 (2022).
Google Scholar
Osman, A. I. et al. Conversion of biomass to biofuels and life cycle assessment: A review. Environ. Chem. Lett. 19, 4075–4118 (2021).
Google Scholar
Shrestha, S., Fonoll, X., Khanal, S. K. & Raskin, L. Biological strategies for enhanced hydrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass during anaerobic digestion: Current status and future perspectives. Bioresour. Technol. 245, 1245–1257 (2017).
Google Scholar
Cho, S.-K. et al. Dry anaerobic digestion of food waste under mesophilic conditions: Performance and methanogenic community analysis. Bioresour. Technol. 131, 210–217 (2013).
Google Scholar
Li, Y. et al. Thermophilic solid-state anaerobic digestion of alkaline-pretreated corn stover. Energy Fuels 28, 3759–3765 (2014).
Google Scholar
Matheri, A. N., Sethunya, V. L., Belaid, M. & Muzenda, E. Analysis of the biogas productivity from dry anaerobic digestion of organic fraction of municipal solid waste. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 81, 2328–2334 (2018).
Google Scholar
Wang, T.-T. et al. Biogas production from distilled grain waste by thermophilic dry anaerobic digestion: Pretreatment of feedstock and dynamics of microbial community. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 184, 685–702 (2018).
Google Scholar
Riya, S. et al. The influence of the total solid content on the stability of dry-thermophilic anaerobic digestion of rice straw and pig manure. Waste Manag. 76, 350–356 (2018).
Google Scholar
Kothari, R., Pandey, A., Kumar, S., Tyagi, V. & Tyagi, S. Different aspects of dry anaerobic digestion for bio-energy: An overview. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 39, 174–195 (2014).
Google Scholar
Al-Wahaibi, A. et al. Techno-economic evaluation of biogas production from food waste via anaerobic digestion. Sci. Rep. 10, 1–16 (2020).
Google Scholar
Seo, K. W., Seo, J., Kim, K., Lim, S. J. & Chung, J. Prediction of biogas production rate from dry anaerobic digestion of food waste: Process-based approach vs. recurrent neural network black-box model. Bioresour. Technol. 341, 125829 (2021).
Google Scholar
Jha, A. K., Li, J., Zhang, L., Ban, Q. & Jin, Y. Comparison between wet and dry anaerobic digestions of cow dung under mesophilic and thermophilic conditions. Adv. Water Resour. Prot. 1, 28–38 (2013).
Fagbohungbe, M. O. et al. High solid anaerobic digestion: Operational challenges and possibilities. Environ. Technol. Innov. 4, 268–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eti.2015.09.003 (2015).
Google Scholar
Fu, Y. et al. Dry anaerobic digestion technologies for agricultural straw and acceptability in China. Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10124588 (2018).
Google Scholar
Li, Y., Park, S. Y. & Zhu, J. Solid-state anaerobic digestion for methane production from organic waste. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 15, 821–826 (2011).
Google Scholar
Lissens, G., Vandevivere, P., De Baere, L., Biey, E. M. & Verstraete, W. Solid waste digestors: Process performance and practice for municipal solid waste digestion. Water Sci. Technol. 44, 91–102. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2001.0473 (2001).
Google Scholar
Fdéz-Güelfo, L. A., Álvarez-Gallego, C., Sales Márquez, D. & Romero García, L. I. Start-up of thermophilic–dry anaerobic digestion of OFMSW using adapted modified SEBAC inoculum. Bioresour. Technol. 101, 9031–9039. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2010.07.021 (2010).
Google Scholar
Greses, S., Tomás-Pejó, E., Markou, G. & González-Fernández, C. Microalgae production for nitrogen recovery of high-strength dry anaerobic digestion effluent. Waste Manag. 139, 321–329 (2022).
Google Scholar
Rossi, E., Pecorini, I. & Iannelli, R. In E3S Web of Conferences. (EDP Sciences).
Merlin, G. & Boileau, H. Anaerobic digestion of agricultural waste: state of the art and future trends. in Anaerobic Digestion: Types, Processes and Environmental Impact. (Nova Science Publishers Inc, New York, 2013).
Massé, D. I. In Biotechnological Applications of Cold-Adapted Organisms (eds. Rosa, M. & Franz, S.) 257–269 (Springer, 1999).
O’Rourke, J. T. Kinetics of Anaerobic Waste Treatment at Reduced Temperatures (1968).
Gong, H. et al. Optimizing dry anaerobic digestion at pilot scale for start-up strategy and long-term operation: Organic loading rate, temperature and co-digestion. Bioresour. Technol. 316, 123828 (2020).
Google Scholar
Saber, M. et al. Enhancement of organic household waste anaerobic digestion performances in a thermophilic pilot digester. Biomass Bioenergy 144, 105933 (2021).
Google Scholar
Boutoute, A. et al. Development of a Sensitivity analysis method to highlight key parameters of a dry Anaerobic Digestion reactor model. Biochem. Eng. J. 173, 108085 (2021).
Google Scholar
Qiao, W. et al. Thermophilic anaerobic digestion of coffee grounds with and without waste activated sludge as co-substrate using a submerged AnMBR: System amendments and membrane performance. Bioresour. Technol. 150, 249–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2013.10.002 (2013).
Google Scholar
Koyama, M. et al. Effect of alkaline pretreatment on mesophilic and thermophilic anaerobic digestion of a submerged macrophyte: Inhibition and recovery against dissolved lignin during semi-continuous operation. Bioresour. Technol. 238, 666–674. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.04.046 (2017).
Google Scholar
Gao, W. J., Leung, K. T., Qin, W. S. & Liao, B. Q. Effects of temperature and temperature shock on the performance and microbial community structure of a submerged anaerobic membrane bioreactor. Bioresour. Technol. 102, 8733–8740. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2011.07.095 (2011).
Google Scholar
Basinas, P., Rusín, J. & Chamrádová, K. Assessment of high-solid mesophilic and thermophilic anaerobic digestion of mechanically-separated municipal solid waste. Environ. Res. 192, 110202 (2021).
Google Scholar
Sun, C. et al. Feasibility of dry anaerobic digestion of beer lees for methane production and biochar enhanced performance at mesophilic and thermophilic temperature. Bioresour. Technol. 276, 65–73 (2019).
Google Scholar
Hariadi, Y. C., Nurhayati, A. Y. & Hariyani, P. Biophysical monitoring on the effect on different composition of goat and cow manure on the growth response of maize to support sustainability. Agric. Agric. Sci. Proc. 9, 118–127 (2016).
Islam, M. In Prepared for the Presentation at the International Workshop on the Use of Bioslurry Domestic Biogas Programme. Bangkok, Thailand. 3–16.
Tang, J.-C., Maie, N., Tada, Y. & Katayama, A. Characterization of the maturing process of cattle manure compost. Process Biochem. 41, 380–389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2005.06.022 (2006).
Google Scholar
Risberg, K., Cederlund, H., Pell, M., Arthurson, V. & Schnürer, A. Comparative characterization of digestate versus pig slurry and cow manure—Chemical composition and effects on soil microbial activity. Waste Manag. 61, 529–538. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2016.12.016 (2017).
Google Scholar
Soto, M., Méndez, R. & Lema, J. M. Methanogenic and non-methanogenic activity tests. Theoretical basis and experimental set up. Water Res. 27, 1361–1376. https://doi.org/10.1016/0043-1354(93)90224-6 (1993).
Google Scholar
Paul, S. & Dutta, A. Challenges and opportunities of lignocellulosic biomass for anaerobic digestion. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 130, 164–174 (2018).
Google Scholar
Gopikumar, S. et al. A method of landfill leachate management using internet of things for sustainable smart city development. Sustain. Cities Soc. 66, 102521 (2021).
Google Scholar
Mu, L., Zhang, L., Zhu, K., Ma, J. & Li, A. Semi-continuous anaerobic digestion of extruded OFMSW: Process performance and energetics evaluation. Bioresour. Technol. 247, 103–115 (2018).
Google Scholar
Calabrò, P. S., Fazzino, F., Limonti, C. & Siciliano, A. Enhancement of anaerobic digestion of waste-activated sludge by conductive materials under high volatile fatty acids-to-alkalinity ratios. Water 13, 391 (2021).
Google Scholar
Weiland, P. & Vdi. In Tagung, Biogas als regenerative Energie: Stand und Perspektiven. 19–32 (VDI).
Wang, K., Yin, J., Shen, D. & Li, N. Anaerobic digestion of food waste for volatile fatty acids (VFAs) production with different types of inoculum: effect of pH. Bioresour. Technol. 161, 395–401 (2014).
Google Scholar
Madigan, M. T. & Martinko, J. (SciELO Espana, 2005).
Ahmad, J. U. & Goni, M. A. Heavy metal contamination in water, soil, and vegetables of the industrial areas in Dhaka, Bangladesh. Environ. Monit. Assess. 166, 347–357 (2010).
Google Scholar
Zakir, H., Rahman, M. M., Rahman, A., Ahmed, I. & Hossain, M. Heavy metals and major ionic pollution assessment in waters of midstream of the river Karatoa in Bangladesh. J. Environ. Sci. Nat. Resour. 5, 149–160 (2012).
Bhuyan, M. S. & Islam, M. S. A critical review of heavy metal pollution and its effects in Bangladesh. Sci. J. Energy Eng. 5, 95 (2017).
Google Scholar
Kumar, A., Miglani, P., Gupta, R. K. & Bhattacharya, T. K. Impact of Ni(II), Zn(II) and Cd(II) on biogassification of potato waste. J. Environ. Biol. 27, 61–66 (2006).
Google Scholar
Wachtmeister, A., Kuba, T., Van Loosdrecht, M. C. M. & Heijnen, J. J. A sludge characterization assay for aerobic and denitrifying phosphorus removing sludge. Water Res. 31, 471–478. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(96)00281-3 (1997).
Google Scholar
Sheng, G.-P. & Yu, H.-Q. Characterization of extracellular polymeric substances of aerobic and anaerobic sludge using three-dimensional excitation and emission matrix fluorescence spectroscopy. Water Res. 40, 1233–1239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2006.01.023 (2006).
Google Scholar
Guo, Y. et al. Variations of heavy metals, nutrients, POPs and particle size distribution during “sludge anaerobic digestion-solar drying-land utilization process”: Case study in China. Sci. Total Environ. 801, 149609 (2021).
Google Scholar
Lin, C.-Y. Effect of heavy metals on volatile fatty acid degradation in anaerobic digestion. Water Res. 26, 177–183 (1992).
Google Scholar
Aljerf, L. & AlMasri, N. A gateway to metal resistance: Bacterial response to heavy metal toxicity in the biological environment. Ann. Adv. Chem. 2, 32–44 (2018).
Google Scholar
Etesami, H. Bacterial mediated alleviation of heavy metal stress and decreased accumulation of metals in plant tissues: Mechanisms and future prospects. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 147, 175–191 (2018).
Google Scholar
Nsair, A., Onen Cinar, S., Alassali, A., Abu Qdais, H. & Kuchta, K. Operational parameters of biogas plants: A review and evaluation study. Energies 13, 3761 (2020).
Google Scholar
Chiu, K., Ye, Z. & Wong, M. H. Growth of Vetiveria zizanioides and Phragmities australis on Pb/Zn and Cu mine tailings amended with manure compost and sewage sludge: A greenhouse study. Bioresour. Technol. 97, 158–170 (2006).
Google Scholar
Mirmohamadsadeghi, S., Karimi, K., Tabatabaei, M. & Aghbashlo, M. Biogas production from food wastes: A review on recent developments and future perspectives. Bioresour. Technol. Rep. 7, 100202 (2019).
Google Scholar
Sliem, M. A., El-Ansary, S., Soliman, W. & Badr, Y. Enhancing biogas production of cow dung during anaerobic digestion using nanoferrites. Biomass Convers. Biorefinery, 1–8 (2021).
Franca, L. S. & Bassin, J. P. The role of dry anaerobic digestion in the treatment of the organic fraction of municipal solid waste: A systematic review. Biomass Bioenergy 143, 105866 (2020).
Google Scholar
Chen, R., Li, Z., Feng, J., Zhao, L. & Yu, J. Effects of digestate recirculation ratios on biogas production and methane yield of continuous dry anaerobic digestion. Bioresour. Technol. 316, 123963 (2020).
Google Scholar
Arelli, V., Begum, S., Anupoju, G. R., Kuruti, K. & Shailaja, S. Dry anaerobic co-digestion of food waste and cattle manure: Impact of total solids, substrate ratio and thermal pre treatment on methane yield and quality of biomanure. Bioresour. Technol. 253, 273–280 (2018).
Google Scholar
Nkemka, V. N. & Hao, X. Start-up of a sequential dry anaerobic digestion of paunch under psychrophilic and mesophilic temperatures. Waste Manag. 74, 144–149 (2018).
Google Scholar
Velghe, F. et al. Volatile fatty acid platform—A cornerstone for the circular bioeconomy. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 368, fnab056 (2021).
Google Scholar
Park, Y.-K. et al. Bioproducts generation from carboxylate platforms by the non-conventional yeast Yarrowia lipolytica. FEMS Yeast Res. 21, foab047 (2021).
Google Scholar
Dai, X., Li, X., Zhang, D., Chen, Y. & Dai, L. Simultaneous enhancement of methane production and methane content in biogas from waste activated sludge and perennial ryegrass anaerobic co-digestion: The effects of pH and C/N ratio. Bioresour. Technol. 216, 323–330 (2016).
Google Scholar
Hassan, M., Ding, W., Shi, Z. & Zhao, S. Methane enhancement through co-digestion of chicken manure and thermo-oxidative cleaved wheat straw with waste activated sludge: AC/N optimization case. Bioresour. Technol. 211, 534–541 (2016).
Google Scholar
Zhen, F. et al. Performance evaluation and microbial community analysis of microaerobic pretreatment on thermophilic dry anaerobic digestion. Biochem. Eng. J. 167, 107873. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bej.2020.107873 (2021).
Google Scholar
Di Maria, F., Barratta, M., Bianconi, F., Placidi, P. & Passeri, D. Solid anaerobic digestion batch with liquid digestate recirculation and wet anaerobic digestion of organic waste: Comparison of system performances and identification of microbial guilds. Waste Manag. 59, 172–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2016.10.039 (2017).
Google Scholar
Liu, C. M. et al. Evaluation of methane yield using acidogenic effluent of NaOH pretreated corn stover in anaerobic digestion. Renew. Energy 116, 224–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2017.07.001 (2018).
Google Scholar
Mustafa, A. M., Li, H., Radwan, A. A., Sheng, K. & Chen, X. Effect of hydrothermal and Ca(OH)2 pretreatments on anaerobic digestion of sugarcane bagasse for biogas production. Bioresour. Technol. 259, 54–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2018.03.028 (2018).
Google Scholar
Cao, W., Sun, C., Li, X., Qiu, J. & Liu, R. Methane production enhancement from products of alkaline hydrogen peroxide pretreated sweet sorghum bagasse. RSC Adv. 7, 5701–5707. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6RA25798D (2017).
Google Scholar
Yao, Y., Bergeron, A. D. & Davaritouchaee, M. Methane recovery from anaerobic digestion of urea-pretreated wheat straw. Renew. Energy 115, 139–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2017.08.038 (2018).
Google Scholar
Hu, Y.-Y. et al. Study of an enhanced dry anaerobic digestion of swine manure: Performance and microbial community property. Bioresour. Technol. 282, 353–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2019.03.014 (2019).
Google Scholar
Muhammad Nasir, I. & Mohd Ghazi, T. I. Pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass from animal manure as a means of enhancing biogas production. Eng. Life Sci. 15, 733–742 (2015).
Google Scholar
Maher, A.-M. Techno-economic assessment of biogas energy from animal wastes in central areas of Palestine: Bethlehem perspective. Int. J. Energy Appl. Technol. 5, 119–126 (2018).
Ahern, E. P., Deane, P., Persson, T., Gallachóir, B. Ó. & Murphy, J. D. A perspective on the potential role of renewable gas in a smart energy island system. Renew. Energy 78, 648–656 (2015).
Google Scholar
Uusitalo, V., Havukainen, J., Kapustina, V., Soukka, R. & Horttanainen, M. Greenhouse gas emissions of biomethane for transport: Uncertainties and allocation methods. Energy Fuels 28, 1901–1910 (2014).
Google Scholar
Alamgir, M. & Ahsan, A. Characterization of MSW and nutrient contents of organic component in Bangladesh. Electr. J. Environ. Agric. Food Chem. Title 6, 1945–1956 (2007).
Google Scholar
Hossain, H. Z., Hossain, Q. H., Monir, M. M. U. & Ahmed, M. T. Municipal solid waste (MSW) as a source of renewable energy in Bangladesh: Revisited. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 39, 35–41 (2014).
Google Scholar
Liu, G., Zhang, R., El-Mashad, H. M. & Dong, R. Effect of feed to inoculum ratios on biogas yields of food and green wastes. Bioresour. Technol. 100, 5103–5108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2009.03.081 (2009).
Google Scholar
Dai, X., Chen, Y., Zhang, D. & Yi, J. High-solid anaerobic co-digestion of sewage sludge and cattle manure: The effects of volatile solid ratio and pH. Sci. Rep. 6, 35194. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep35194 (2016).
Google Scholar
Salma A., Iqbal, S. R., Rahman, M., Yousuf, A. In 10th International Conference on Mechanical Engineering, ICME. 661–662.
Sajeena Beevi, B., Madhu, G. & Sahoo, D. K. Performance and kinetic study of semi-dry thermophilic anaerobic digestion of organic fraction of municipal solid waste. Waste Manag. 36, 93–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2014.09.024 (2015).
Google Scholar
McGhee, T. A method for approximation of the volatile acid concentrations in anaerobic digesters. Water Sew. Works 115, e166 (1968).
