Xie, J. et al. Cell-penetrating peptides in diagnosis and treatment of human diseases: from preclinical research to clinical application. Front. Pharmacol. 11, 697 (2020).
Google Scholar
Borrelli, A., Tornesello, A. L., Tornesello, M. L. & Buonaguro, F. M. Cell penetrating peptides as molecular carriers for anti-cancer agents. Molecules 23, 295 (2018).
Google Scholar
Zuconelli, C. R. et al. Modulation of Orai1 by cationic peptides triggers their direct cytosolic uptake. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Biomembr. 1862, 183155 (2020).
Google Scholar
Wang, T. Y. et al. Membrane oxidation enables the cytosolic entry of polyarginine cell-penetrating peptides. J. Biol. Chem. 291, 7902–7914 (2016).
Google Scholar
Allolio, C. et al. Arginine-rich cell-penetrating peptides induce membrane multilamellarity and subsequently enter via formation of a fusion pore. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 115, 11923–11928 (2018).
Google Scholar
Herce, H. D., Garcia, A. E. & Cardoso, M. C. Fundamental molecular mechanism for the cellular uptake of guanidinium-rich molecules. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136, 17459–17467 (2014).
Google Scholar
Xu, J. et al. Cell-penetrating peptide: a means of breaking through the physiological barriers of different tissues and organs. J. Control. Release 309, 106–124 (2019).
Google Scholar
Chen, X., Liu, H., Li, A., Ji, S. & Fei, H. Hydrophobicity-tuned anion responsiveness underlies endosomolytic cargo delivery mediated by amphipathic vehicle peptides. J. Biol. Chem. 297, 101364 (2021).
Google Scholar
Kalafatovic, D. & Giralt, E. Cell-penetrating peptides: design strategies beyond primary structure and amphipathicity. Molecules 22, 1929 (2017).
Google Scholar
Peraro, L. & Kritzer, J. A. Emerging methods and design principles for cell-penetrant peptides. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 57, 11868–11881 (2018).
Google Scholar
Ohgita, T. et al. A novel amphipathic cell-penetrating peptide based on the N-terminal glycosaminoglycan binding region of human apolipoprotein E. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Biomembr. 1861, 541–549 (2019).
Google Scholar
Takechi-Haraya, Y. et al. Enthalpy-driven interactions with sulfated glycosaminoglycans promote cell membrane penetration of arginine peptides. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Biomembr. 1858, 1339–1349 (2016).
Google Scholar
Yang, C.-H. et al. An engineered arginine-rich α-helical antimicrobial peptide exhibits broad-spectrum bactericidal activity against pathogenic bacteria and reduces bacterial infections in mice. Sci. Rep. 8, 14602 (2018).
Google Scholar
McErlean, E. M. et al. Rational design and characterisation of an amphipathic cell penetrating peptide for non-viral gene delivery. Int. J. Pharm. 596, 120223 (2021).
Google Scholar
Oikawa, K., Islam, M. M., Horii, Y., Yoshizumi, T. & Numata, K. Screening of a cell-penetrating peptide library in Escherichia coli: relationship between cell penetration efficiency and cytotoxicity. ACS Omega 3, 16489–16499 (2018).
Google Scholar
Splith, K. & Neundorf, I. Antimicrobial peptides with cell-penetrating peptide properties and vice versa. Eur. Biophys. J. 40, 387–397 (2011).
Google Scholar
Hilinski, G. J. et al. Stitched alpha-helical peptides via bis ring-closing metathesis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136, 12314–12322 (2014).
Google Scholar
Eisenberg, D., Weiss, R. M. & Terwilliger, T. C. The helical hydrophobic moment: a measure of the amphiphilicity of a helix. Nature 299, 371–374 (1982).
Google Scholar
Schiffer, M. & Edmundson, A. B. Use of helical wheels to represent the structures of proteins and to identify segments with helical potential. Biophys. J. 7, 121–135 (1967).
Google Scholar
Kelly, S. M., Jess, T. J. & Price, N. C. How to study proteins by circular dichroism. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1751, 119–139 (2005).
Google Scholar
Wexler-Cohen, Y., Sackett, K. & Shai, Y. The role of the N-terminal heptad repeat of HIV-1 in the actual lipid mixing step as revealed by its substitution with distant coiled coils. Biochemistry 44, 5853–5861 (2005).
Google Scholar
Ciobanasu, C., Siebrasse, J. P. & Kubitscheck, U. Cell-penetrating HIV1 TAT peptides can generate pores in model membranes. Biophys. J. 99, 153–162 (2010).
Google Scholar
Prevette, L. E., Benish, N. C., Schoenecker, A. R. & Braden, K. J. Cell-penetrating compounds preferentially bind glycosaminoglycans over plasma membrane lipids in a charge density-and stereochemistry-dependent manner. Biophys. Chem. 207, 40–50 (2015).
Google Scholar
Silverstein, S. C., Steinman, R. M. & Cohn, Z. A. Endocytosis. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 46, 669–722 (1977).
Google Scholar
Illien, F. et al. Quantitative fluorescence spectroscopy and flow cytometry analyses of cell-penetrating peptides internalization pathways: optimization, pitfalls, comparison with mass spectrometry quantification. Sci. Rep. 6, 36938 (2016).
Google Scholar
Ladokhin, A. S., Jayasinghe, S. & White, S. H. How to measure and analyze tryptophan fluorescence in membranes properly, and why bother?. Anal. Biochem. 285, 235–245 (2000).
Google Scholar
Wallbrecher, R. et al. Membrane permeation of arginine-rich cell-penetrating peptides independent of transmembrane potential as a function of lipid composition and membrane fluidity. J. Control. Release 256, 68–78 (2017).
Google Scholar
Sekiya, Y., Sakashita, S., Shimizu, K., Usui, K. & Kawano, R. Channel current analysis estimates the pore-formation and the penetration of transmembrane peptides. Analyst 143, 3540–3543 (2018).
Google Scholar
Takechi-Haraya, Y. & Saito, H. Current understanding of physicochemical mechanisms for cell membrane penetration of arginine-rich cell penetrating peptides: role of glycosaminoglycan interactions. Curr. Protein Pept. Sci. 19, 623–630 (2018).
Google Scholar
Walrant, A., Cardon, S., Burlina, F. & Sagan, S. Membrane crossing and membranotropic activity of cell-penetrating peptides: dangerous liaisons?. Acc. Chem. Res. 50, 2968–2975 (2017).
Google Scholar
Ohgita, T. et al. Enhancement of direct membrane penetration of arginine-rich peptides by polyproline II helix structure. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Biomembr. 1862, 183403 (2020).
Google Scholar
Reviakine, I. & Brisson, A. Formation of supported phospholipid bilayers from unilamellar vesicles investigated by atomic force microscopy. Langmuir 16, 1806–1815 (2000).
Google Scholar
Murrell, M. P. et al. Liposome adhesion generates traction stress. Nat. Phys. 10, 163–169 (2014).
Google Scholar
Takechi-Haraya, Y. et al. Atomic force microscopic analysis of the effect of lipid composition on liposome membrane rigidity. Langmuir 32, 6074–6082 (2016).
Google Scholar
Mishra, A. et al. Translocation of HIV TAT peptide and analogues induced by multiplexed membrane and cytoskeletal interactions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108, 16883–16888 (2011).
Google Scholar
Schmidt, N., Mishra, A., Lai, G. H. & Wong, G. C. L. Arginine-rich cell-penetrating peptides. FEBS Lett. 584, 1806–1813 (2010).
Google Scholar
Tang, M., Waring, A. J. & Hong, M. Phosphate-mediated arginine insertion into lipid membranes and pore formation by a cationic membrane peptide from solid-state NMR. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 129, 11438–11446 (2007).
Google Scholar
Almeida, C., Maniti, O., Di Pisa, M., Swiecicki, J. M. & Ayala-Sanmartin, J. Cholesterol re-organisation and lipid de-packing by arginine-rich cell penetrating peptides: role in membrane translocation. PLoS ONE 14, e0210985 (2019).
Google Scholar
Bahnsen, J. S., Franzyk, H., Sandberg-Schaal, A. & Nielsen, H. M. Antimicrobial and cell-penetrating properties of penetratin analogs: effect of sequence and secondary structure. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Biomembr. 1828, 223–232 (2013).
Google Scholar
Horváti, K. et al. Comparative analysis of internalisation, haemolytic, cytotoxic and antibacterial effect of membrane-active cationic peptides: aspects of experimental setup. Amino Acids 49, 1053–1067 (2017).
Google Scholar
Kauffman, W. B., Fuselier, T., He, J. & Wimley, W. C. Mechanism matters: a taxonomy of cell penetrating peptides. Trends Biochem. Sci. 40, 749–764 (2015).
Google Scholar
Narayana, J. L. et al. Two distinct amphipathic peptide antibiotics with systemic efficacy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 117, 19446–19454 (2020).
Google Scholar
Scheller, A., Wiesner, B., Melzig, M., Bienert, M. & Oehlke, J. Evidence for an amphipathicity independent cellular uptake of amphipathic cell-penetrating peptides. Eur. J. Biochem. 267, 6043–6050 (2000).
Google Scholar
He, S., Stone, T. A. & Deber, C. M. Uncoupling amphipathicity and hydrophobicity: role of charge clustering in membrane interactions of cationic antimicrobial peptides. Biochemistry 60, 2586–2592 (2021).
Google Scholar
El-Andaloussi, S., Järver, P., Johansson, H. J. & Langel, Ü. Cargo-dependent cytotoxicity and delivery efficacy of cell-penetrating peptides: a comparative study. Biochem. J. 407, 285–292 (2007).
Google Scholar
Jobin, M. L. et al. Biophysical insight on the membrane insertion of an arginine-rich cell-penetrating peptide. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 20, 4441 (2019).
Google Scholar
Alvares, D. S., Wilke, N. & Neto, J. R. Effect of N-terminal acetylation on lytic activity and lipid-packing perturbation induced in model membranes by a mastoparan-like peptide. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Biomembr. 1860, 737–748 (2018).
Google Scholar
Strømland, Ø., Handegård, Ø. S., Govasli, M. L., Wen, H. & Halskau, Ø. Peptides derived from α-lactalbumin membrane binding helices oligomerize in presence of lipids and disrupt bilayers. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Biomembr. 1859, 1029–1039 (2017).
Google Scholar
Snider, C., Jayasinghe, S., Hristova, K. & White, S. H. MPEx: a tool for exploring membrane proteins. Protein Sci. 18, 2624–2628 (2009).
Google Scholar
Saito, H. et al. Alpha-helix formation is required for high affinity binding of human apolipoprotein A-I to lipids. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 20974–20981 (2004).
Google Scholar
Takechi-Haraya, Y., Goda, Y. & Sakai-Kato, K. Atomic force microscopy study on the stiffness of nanosized liposomes containing charged lipids. Langmuir 34, 7805–7812 (2018).
Google Scholar
Scholtz, J. M., Qian, H., York, E. J., Stewart, J. M. & Baldwin, R. L. Parameters of helix–coil transition theory for alanine-based peptides of varying chain lengths in water. Biopolymers 31, 1463–1470 (1991).
Google Scholar
Saigo, N., Izumi, K. & Kawano, R. Electrophysiological analysis of antimicrobial peptides in diverse species. ACS Omega 4, 13124–13130 (2019).
Google Scholar
Takechi-Haraya, Y., Goda, Y., Izutsu, K. & Sakai-Kato, K. Improved atomic force microscopy stiffness measurements of nanoscale liposomes by cantilever tip shape evaluation. Anal. Chem. 91, 10432–10440 (2019).
Google Scholar
Sader, J. E., Chon, J. W. M. & Mulvaney, P. Calibration of rectangular atomic force microscope cantilevers. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 70, 3967–3969 (1999).
Google Scholar
Hutter, J. L. & Bechhoefer, J. Calibration of atomic-force microscope tips. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 64, 1868–1873 (1993).
Google Scholar
Nečas, D. & Klapetek, P. Gwyddion: an open-source software for SPM data analysis. Cent. Eur. J. Phys. 10, 181–188 (2012).
Vorselen, D., MacKintosh, F. C., Roos, W. H. & Wuite, G. J. L. Competition between bending and internal pressure governs the mechanics of fluid nanovesicles. ACS Nano 11, 2628–2636 (2017).
Google Scholar
Delorme, N. & Fery, A. Direct method to study membrane rigidity of small vesicles based on atomic force microscope force spectroscopy. Phys. Rev. E 74, 030901 (2006).
Google Scholar
