Tang, F. et al. mRNA-Seq whole-transcriptome analysis of a single cell. Nat. Methods 6, 377–382 (2009).
Google Scholar
Macosko, E. Z. et al. Highly parallel genome-wide expression profiling of individual cells using nanoliter droplets. Cell 161, 1202–1214 (2015).
Google Scholar
Klein, A. M. et al. Droplet barcoding for single-cell transcriptomics applied to embryonic stem cells. Cell 161, 1187–1201 (2015).
Google Scholar
Gierahn, T. M. et al. RNA sequencing of single cells at high throughput. Nat. Methods 14, 395–398 (2017).
Google Scholar
Han, X. et al. Mapping the mouse cell atlas by Microwell-Seq. Cell 172, 1091–1107 (2018).
Google Scholar
Rosenberg, A. B. et al. Single-cell profiling of the developing mouse brain and spinal cord with split-pool barcoding. Science 360, 176–182 (2018).
Google Scholar
Li, H. et al. Fly cell atlas: a single-cell transcriptomic atlas of the adult fruit fly. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.07.04.451050 (2021).
Tabula Muris Consortium Single-cell transcriptomics of 20 mouse organs creates a Tabula Muris. Nature 562, 367–372 (2018).
Han, X. et al. Construction of a human cell landscape at single-cell level. Nature 581, 303–309 (2020).
Google Scholar
Stoeckius, M. et al. Cell Hashing with barcoded antibodies enables multiplexing and doublet detection for single cell genomics. Genome Biol. 19, 224 (2018).
Google Scholar
McGinnis, C. S. et al. MULTI-seq: sample multiplexing for single-cell RNA sequencing using lipid-tagged indices. Nat. Methods 16, 619–626 (2019).
Google Scholar
Gehring, J., Hwee Park, J., Chen, S., Thomson, M. & Pachter, L. Highly multiplexed single-cell RNA-seq by DNA oligonucleotide tagging of cellular proteins. Nat. Biotechnol. 38, 35–38 (2020).
Google Scholar
Hwang, B., Lee, J. H. & Bang, D. Single-cell RNA sequencing technologies and bioinformatics pipelines. Exp. Mol. Med. 50, 1–14 (2018).
Google Scholar
10X Genomics. Chromium Single Cell 3ʹ Reagent Kits User Guide (v3 Chemistry) (CG000183 Rev C) (2018).
DeLaughter, D. M. The use of the Fluidigm C1 for RNA expression analyses of single cells. Curr. Protoc. Mol. Biol. 122, e55 (2018).
Google Scholar
Wagner, D. E. et al. Single-cell mapping of gene expression landscapes and lineage in the zebrafish embryo. Science 360, 981–987 (2018).
Google Scholar
Packer, J. S. et al. A lineage-resolved molecular atlas of C. elegans embryogenesis at single-cell resolution. Science 365, eaax1971 (2019).
Google Scholar
Serra, D. et al. Self-organization and symmetry breaking in intestinal organoid development. Nature 562, 66–72 (2019).
Grün, D. et al. Single-cell messenger RNA sequencing reveals rare intestinal cell types. Nature 525, 251–255 (2015).
Google Scholar
Lukonin, I. et al. Phenotypic landscape of intestinal organoid regeneration. Nature 586, 275–280 (2020).
Google Scholar
Tirier, S. M. et al. Pheno-seq: linking visual features and gene expression in 3D cell culture systems. Sci. Rep. 9, 12367 (2019).
Google Scholar
Unger, M. A., Chou, H. P., Thorsen, T., Scherer, A. & Quake, S. R. Monolithic microfabricated valves and pumps by multilayer soft lithography. Science 288, 113–116 (2000).
Google Scholar
Biocanin, M., Bues, J., Dainese, R., Amstad, E. & Deplancke, B. Simplified Drop-seq workflow with minimized bead loss using a bead capture and processing microfluidic chip. Lab Chip 19, 1610–1620 (2019).
Google Scholar
Sato, T. et al. Single Lgr5 stem cells build crypt–villus structures in vitro without a mesenchymal niche. Nature 459, 262–265 (2009).
Google Scholar
Haber, A. L. et al. A single-cell survey of the small intestinal epithelium. Nature 551, 333–339 (2017).
Google Scholar
Yin, X. et al. Niche-independent high-purity cultures of Lgr5+ intestinal stem cells and their progeny. Nat. Methods 11, 106–112 (2014).
Google Scholar
Gregorieff, A., Liu, Y., Inanlou, M. R., Khomchuk, Y. & Wrana, J. L. Yap-dependent reprogramming of Lgr5+ stem cells drives intestinal regeneration and cancer. Nature 526, 715–718 (2015).
Google Scholar
Ayyaz, A. et al. Single-cell transcriptomes of the regenerating intestine reveal a revival stem cell. Nature 569, 121–125 (2019).
Google Scholar
Roulis, M. et al. Paracrine orchestration of intestinal tumorigenesis by a mesenchymal niche. Nature 580, 524–529 (2020).
Google Scholar
Battich, N. et al. Sequencing metabolically labeled transcripts in single cells reveals mRNA turnover strategies. Science 367, 1151–1156 (2020).
Google Scholar
Street, K. et al. Slingshot: cell lineage and pseudotime inference for single-cell transcriptomics. BMC Genomics 19, 477 (2018).
Google Scholar
Birchenough, G., Johansson, M., Gustafsson, J., Bergstrom, J. & Hansson, G. C. New developments in goblet cell mucus secretion and function. Mucosal Immunol. 8, 712–719 (2015).
Google Scholar
Yui, S. et al. YAP/TAZ-dependent reprogramming of colonic epithelium links ECM remodeling to tissue regeneration. Cell Stem Cell 22, 35–49 (2018).
Google Scholar
Macnair, W. & Claassen, M. psupertime: supervised pseudotime inference for single cell RNA-seq data with sequential labels. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/622001 (2019).
Lareau, C. A., Ma, S., Duarte, F. M. & Buenrostro, J. D. Inference and effects of barcode multiplets in droplet-based single-cell assays. Nat. Commun. 11, 866 (2020).
Google Scholar
Lun, A. T. L. et al. EmptyDrops: distinguishing cells from empty droplets in droplet-based single-cell RNA sequencing data. Genome Biol. 20, 63 (2019).
Google Scholar
Chung, M., Núñez, D., Cai, D. & Kurabayashi, K. Deterministic droplet-based co-encapsulation and pairing of microparticles via active sorting and downstream merging. Lab Chip 17, 3664–3671 (2017).
Google Scholar
Cheng, Y. H. et al. Hydro-Seq enables contamination-free high-throughput single-cell RNA-sequencing for circulating tumor cells. Nat. Commun. 10, 2163 (2019).
Google Scholar
Zhang, M. et al. Highly parallel and efficient single cell mRNA sequencing with paired picoliter chambers. Nat. Commun. 11, 2118 (2020).
Google Scholar
Pollen, A. A. et al. Low-coverage single-cell mRNA sequencing reveals cellular heterogeneity and activated signaling pathways in developing cerebral cortex. Nat. Biotechnol. 32, 1053–1058 (2014).
Google Scholar
Dura, B. et al. Profiling lymphocyte interactions at the single-cell level by microfluidic cell pairing. Nat. Commun. 6, 5940 (2015).
Google Scholar
Gérard, A. et al. High-throughput single-cell activity-based screening and sequencing of antibodies using droplet microfluidics. Nat. Biotechnol. 38, 715–721 (2020).
Google Scholar
Maier, G. L. et al. Multimodal and multisensory coding in the Drosophila larval peripheral gustatory center. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.21.109959 (2020).
Haque, A., Engel, J., Teichmann, S. A. & Lönnberg, T. A practical guide to single-cell RNA-sequencing for biomedical research and clinical applications. Genome Med. 9, 75 (2017).
Google Scholar
Denisenko, E. et al. Systematic assessment of tissue dissociation and storage biases in single-cell and single-nucleus RNA-seq workflows. Genome Biol. 21, 130 (2020).
Google Scholar
Mustata, R. C. et al. Identification of Lgr5-independent spheroid-generating progenitors of the mouse fetal intestinal epithelium. Cell Rep. 5, 421–432 (2013).
Google Scholar
McKenna, A. et al. Whole-organism lineage tracing by combinatorial and cumulative genome editing. Science 353, aaf7907 (2016).
Google Scholar
Zheng, G. X. Y. et al. Massively parallel digital transcriptional profiling of single cells. Nat. Commun. 8, 14049 (2016).
Zhang, X. et al. Comparative analysis of droplet-based ultra-high-throughput single-cell RNA-seq systems. Mol. Cell 73, 130–142 (2019).
Google Scholar
Picelli, S. et al. Full-length RNA-seq from single cells using Smart-seq2. Nat. Protoc. 9, 171–181 (2014).
Google Scholar
Hashimshony, T. et al. CEL-Seq2: sensitive highly-multiplexed single-cell RNA-Seq. Genome Biol. 17, 77 (2016).
Google Scholar
Goldstein, L. D. et al. Massively parallel nanowell-based single-cell gene expression profiling. BMC Genomics 18, 519 (2017).
Google Scholar
Wang, Y. et al. Comparative analysis of commercially available single-cell RNA sequencing platforms for their performance in complex human tissues. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/541433 (2019).
Ding, J. et al. Systematic comparison of single-cell and single-nucleus RNA-sequencing methods. Nat. Biotechnol. 38, 737–746 (2020).
Google Scholar
Gjorevski, N. et al. Designer matrices for intestinal stem cell and organoid culture. Nature 539, 560–564 (2016).
Google Scholar
Bas, T. & Augenlicht, L. H. Real time analysis of metabolic profile in ex vivo mouse intestinal crypt organoid cultures. J. Vis. Exp. 93, e52026 (2014).
Macosko, E., Goldman, M. & McCarroll, S. Drop-Seq Laboratory Protocol version 3.1. http://mccarrolllab.org/download/905/ (2015).
Dobin, A. et al. STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner. Bioinformatics 29, 15–21 (2013).
Google Scholar
Stuart, T. et al. Comprehensive integration of single-dell data. Cell 177, 1888–1902 (2019).
Google Scholar
Anders, S., Pyl, P. T. & Huber, W. HTSeq-A Python framework to work with high-throughput sequencing data. Bioinformatics 31, 166–169 (2015).
Google Scholar
Saelens, W., Cannoodt, R., Todorov, H. & Saeys, Y. A comparison of single-cell trajectory inference methods. Nat. Biotechnol. 37, 547–554 (2019).
Google Scholar
Buenrostro, J. D., Giresi, P. G., Zaba, L. C., Chang, H. Y. & Greenleaf, W. J. Transposition of native chromatin for fast and sensitive epigenomic profiling of open chromatin, DNA-binding proteins and nucleosome position. Nat. Methods 10, 1213–1218 (2013).
Google Scholar
