Wenger, A. M. et al. Accurate circular consensus long-read sequencing improves variant detection and assembly of a human genome. Nat. Biotechnol. 37, 1155–1162 (2019).
Google Scholar
Cheng, H., Concepcion, G. T., Feng, X., Zhang, H. & Li, H. Haplotype-resolved de novo assembly using phased assembly graphs with hifiasm. Nat. Methods 18, 170–175 (2021).
Google Scholar
Nurk, S. et al. HiCanu: accurate assembly of segmental duplications, satellites, and allelic variants from high-fidelity long reads. Genome Res. 30, 1291–1305 (2020).
Google Scholar
Shafin, K. et al. Nanopore sequencing and the Shasta toolkit enable efficient de novo assembly of eleven human genomes. Nat. Biotechnol. 38, 1044–1053 (2020).
Google Scholar
Mahmoud, M. et al. Structural variant calling: the long and the short of it. Genome Biol. 20, 246 (2019).
Google Scholar
De Coster, W., Weissensteiner, M. H. & Sedlazeck, F. J. Towards population-scale long-read sequencing. Nat. Rev. Genet. 22, 572–587 (2021).
Google Scholar
Mandelker, D. et al. Navigating highly homologous genes in a molecular diagnostic setting: a resource for clinical next-generation sequencing. Genet. Med. 18, 1282–1289 (2016).
Google Scholar
Ebbert, M. T. W. et al. Systematic analysis of dark and camouflaged genes reveals disease-relevant genes hiding in plain sight. Genome Biol. 20, 1–23 (2019).
Google Scholar
Lincoln, S. E. et al. One in seven pathogenic variants can be challenging to detect by NGS: an analysis of 450,000 patients with implications for clinical sensitivity and genetic test implementation. Genet. Med. 23, 1673–1680 (2021).
Zook, J. M. et al. An open resource for accurately benchmarking small variant and reference calls. Nat. Biotechnol. 37, 561–566 (2019).
Google Scholar
Zook, J. M. et al. A robust benchmark for detection of germline large deletions and insertions. Nat. Biotechnol. 38, 1347–1355 (2020) ; erratum 38, 1357 (2020).
Google Scholar
Olson, N. D. et al. precisionFDA Truth Challenge V2: calling variants from short- and long-reads in difficult-to-map regions. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.11.13.380741 (2020).
Wagner, J. et al. Benchmarking challenging small variants with linked and long reads. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.07.24.212712 (2020).
Chin, C.-S. et al. A diploid assembly-based benchmark for variants in the major histocompatibility complex. Nat. Commun. 11, 4794 (2020).
Google Scholar
Goldfeder, R. L. et al. Medical implications of technical accuracy in genome sequencing. Genome Med. 8, 24 (2016).
Google Scholar
Ball, M. P. et al. A public resource facilitating clinical use of genomes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 11920–11927 (2012).
Google Scholar
Tate, J. G. et al. COSMIC: the Catalogue Of Somatic Mutations In Cancer. Nucleic Acids Res. 47, D941–D947 (2019).
Google Scholar
Ross, M. G. et al. Characterizing and measuring bias in sequence data. Genome Biol. 14, R51 (2013).
Google Scholar
Prior, T. W., Leach, M. E. & Finanger, E. Spinal muscular atrophy. In GeneReviews [Internet] (University of Washington, 2020).
Biros, I. & Forrest, S. Spinal muscular atrophy: untangling the knot? J. Med. Genet. 36, 1–8 (1999).
Google Scholar
Leiding, J. W. & Holland, S. M. Chronic granulomatous disease. In GeneReviews [Internet] (University of Washington, 2016).
Innan, H. A two-locus gene conversion model with selection and its application to the human RHCE and RHD genes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100, 8793–8798 (2003).
Google Scholar
Hayakawa, T. et al. Coevolution of Siglec-11 and Siglec-16 via gene conversion in primates. BMC Evol. Biol. 17, 228 (2017).
Google Scholar
Garg, P. et al. Pervasive cis effects of variation in copy number of large tandem repeats on local DNA methylation and gene expression. Am. J. Hum. Genet. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajhg.2021.03.016 (2021).
Google Scholar
Lennerz, J. K. et al. Addition of H19 ‘loss of methylation testing’ for Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome (BWS) increases the diagnostic yield. J. Mol. Diagn. 12, 576–588 (2010).
Google Scholar
Nurk, S. et al. The complete sequence of a human genome. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.05.26.445798 (2021).
Aganezov, S. et al. A complete reference genome improves analysis of human genetic variation. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.07.12.452063 (2021).
Boisson, B. et al. Rescue of recurrent deep intronic mutation underlying cell type–dependent quantitative NEMO deficiency. J. Clin. Invest. 129, 583–597 (2018).
Google Scholar
1000 Genomes Project Consortium et al. A global reference for human genetic variation. Nature 526, 68–74 (2015).
Google Scholar
Schmidt, K., Noureen, A., Kronenberg, F. & Utermann, G. Structure, function, and genetics of lipoprotein (a). J. Lipid Res. 57, 1339–1359 (2016).
Google Scholar
Li, H., Feng, X. & Chu, C. The design and construction of reference pangenome graphs with minigraph. Genome Biol. 21, 265 (2020).
Google Scholar
Shumate, A. & Salzberg, S. L. Liftoff: accurate mapping of gene annotations. Bioinform. 37, 1639–1643 (2020).
Theunissen, F. et al. Structural variants may be a source of missing heritability in sALS. Front. Neurosci. 14, 47 (2020).
Google Scholar
Guo, Y. et al. Improvements and impacts of GRCh38 human reference on high throughput sequencing data analysis.Genomics 109, 83–90 (2017).
Google Scholar
Pan, B. et al. Similarities and differences between variants called with human reference genome HG19 or HG38. BMC Bioinform. 20, 101 (2019).
Miller, C. A. et al. Failure to detect mutations in U2AF1 due to changes in the GRCh38 reference sequence. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.05.07.442430 (2021).
Li, H. et al. Exome variant discrepancies due to reference-genome differences. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 108, 1239–1250 (2021).
Google Scholar
Collins, R. L. et al. A structural variation reference for medical and population genetics. Nature 590, E55 (2021).
Google Scholar
Quinlan, A. R. & Hall, I. M. BEDTools: a flexible suite of utilities for comparing genomic features. Bioinform. 26, 841–842 (2010).
Li, H. Minimap2: pairwise alignment for nucleotide sequences. Bioinform. 34, 3094–3100 (2018).
Krusche, P. et al. Best practices for benchmarking germline small-variant calls in human genomes. Nat. Biotechnol. 37, 555–560 (2019).
Google Scholar
Van der Auwera, G. A. & O’Connor, B. D. Genomics in the Cloud: Using Docker, GATK, and WDL in Terra (O’Reilly Media, 2020).
Farek, J. et al. xAtlas: scalable small variant calling across heterogeneous next-generation sequencing experiments. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/295071 (2018).
Edge, P. & Bansal, V. Longshot enables accurate variant calling in diploid genomes from single-molecule long read sequencing. Nat. Commun. 10, 4660 (2019).
Google Scholar
Shafin, K. et al. Haplotype-aware variant calling with PEPPER-Margin-DeepVariant enables high accuracy in nanopore long-reads. Nat. Meth. 18, 1322–1332 (2021).
Sahraeian, S. M. E. et al. Deep convolutional neural networks for accurate somatic mutation detection. Nat. Commun. 10, 1041 (2019).
Google Scholar
Walker, B. J. et al. Pilon: an integrated tool for comprehensive microbial variant detection and genome assembly improvement. PLoS One 9, e112963 (2014).
Google Scholar
Patterson, M. et al. WhatsHap: weighted haplotype assembly for future-generation sequencing reads. J. Comput. Biol. 6, 498–509 (2015).
Zook, J. M. et al. Extensive sequencing of seven human genomes to characterize benchmark reference materials. Sci. Data 3, 160025 (2016).
Google Scholar
Li, H. Aligning sequence reads, clone sequences and assembly contigs with BWA-MEM. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1303.3997 (2013).
Regier, A. A. et al. Functional equivalence of genome sequencing analysis pipelines enables harmonized variant calling across human genetics projects.Nat. Commun. 9, 4038 (2018).
Google Scholar
Poplin, R. et al. Scaling accurate genetic variant discovery to tens of thousands of samples. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/201178 (2018).
Li, H. et al. The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools. Bioinform. 25, 2078–2079 (2009).
Rausch, T. et al. DELLY: structural variant discovery by integrated paired-end and split-read analysis. Bioinform. 28, 333–339 (2012).
Cameron, D. L. et al. GRIDSS: sensitive and specific genomic rearrangement detection using positional de Bruijn graph assembly. Genome Res. 27, 2050–2060 (2017).
Google Scholar
Layer, R. M., Chiang, C., Quinlan, A. R. & Hall, I. M. LUMPY: a probabilistic framework for structural variant discovery. Genome Biol. 15, R84 (2014).
Google Scholar
Chen, X. et al. Manta: rapid detection of structural variants and indels for germline and cancer sequencing applications. Bioinform. 32, 1220–1222 (2016).
Kronenberg, Z. N. et al. Wham: identifying structural variants of biological consequence. PLoS Comput. Biol. 11, e1004572 (2015).
Google Scholar
Jeffares, D. C. et al. Transient structural variations have strong effects on quantitative traits and reproductive isolation in fission yeast. Nat. Commun. 8, 14061 (2017).
Google Scholar
De Coster, W., D’Hert, S., Schultz, D. T., Cruts, M. & Van Broeckhoven, C. NanoPack: visualizing and processing long-read sequencing data. Bioinform. 34, 2666–2669 (2018).
Sedlazeck, F. J. et al. Accurate detection of complex structural variations using single-molecule sequencing. Nat. Methods 15, 461–468 (2018).
Google Scholar
Jiang, T. et al. Long-read-based human genomic structural variation detection with cuteSV. Genome Biol. 21, 189 (2020).
Google Scholar
Tarasov, A., Vilella, A. J., Cuppen, E., Nijman, I. J. & Prins, P. Sambamba: fast processing of NGS alignment formats. Bioinform. 31, 2032–2034 (2015).
Faust, G. G. & Hall, I. M. SAMBLASTER: fast duplicate marking and structural variant read extraction. Bioinform. 30, 2503–2505 (2014).
Poplin, R. et al. A universal SNP and small-indel variant caller using deep neural networks. Nat. Biotechnol. 36, 983–987 (2018).
Google Scholar
