Gottwald, T. R. Current epidemiological understanding of citrus huanglongbing. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 48, 119–139 (2010).
Google Scholar
Nakabachi, A. et al. Defensive bacteriome symbiont with a drastically reduced genome. Curr. Biol. 23, 1478–1484 (2013).
Google Scholar
Pelz-Stelinski, K. & Killiny, N. Better together: Association with ‘Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus’ increases the reproductive fitness of its insect vector, Diaphorina citri (Hemiptera: Liviidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 109, 371–376 (2016).
Google Scholar
Chu, C.-C., Gill, T. A., Hoffmann, M. & Pelz-Stelinski, K. S. Inter-population variability of endosymbiont densities in the Asian citrus psyllid (Diaphorina citri Kuwayama). Microb. Ecol. 71, 999–1007 (2016).
Google Scholar
Jain, M., Fleites, L. A. & Gabriel, D. W. A small Wolbachia protein directly represses phage lytic cycle genes in “Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus” within psyllids. MSphere 2, e00171-e1117 (2017).
Google Scholar
Fagen, J. R. et al. Characterization of the relative abundance of the citrus pathogen Ca: Liberibacter asiaticus in the microbiome of its insect vector, Diaphorina citri, using high throughput 16S rRNA sequencing. Open Microbiol. J. 6, 29 (2012).
Google Scholar
Serbus, L. R., Casper-Lindley, C., Landmann, F. & Sullivan, W. The Genetics and Cell Biology of Wolbachia-Host Interactions. Annu. Rev. Genet. 42, 683–707. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.genet.41.110306.130354 (2008).
Google Scholar
Werren, J. H., Baldo, L. & Clark, M. E. Wolbachia: master manipulators of invertebrate biology. Nat. Rev. Genet. 6, 741–751. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro1969 (2008).
Google Scholar
Kamtchum-Tatuene, J., Makepeace, B. L., Benjamin, L., Baylis, M. & Solomon, T. The potential role of Wolbachia in controlling the transmission of emerging human arboviral infections. Curr. Opin. Infect. Dis. 30, 108–116. https://doi.org/10.1097/QCO.0000000000000342 (2017).
Google Scholar
Fraser, J. E. et al. Novel Wolbachia-transinfected Aedes aegypti mosquitoes possess diverse fitness and vector competence phenotypes. PLoS Pathog. 13, e1006751 (2017).
Caragata, E. P. et al. Pathogen blocking in Wolbachia-infected Aedes aegypti is not affected by Zika and dengue virus co-infection. PLOS Negl. Trop. Dis. 13, e0007443 (2019).
Saha, S. et al. Survey of endosymbionts in the Diaphorina citri metagenome and assembly of a Wolbachia wDi draft genome. PLoS ONE 7, 1 (2012).
Eid, J. et al. Real-time DNA sequencing from single polymerase molecules. Science 323, 133–138 (2009).
Google Scholar
Hotopp, J. C. D. & Klasson, L. The complexities and nuances of analyzing the genome of Drosophila ananassae and its Wolbachia endosymbiont. G3-Genes Genom Genet. 8, 373–374 (2018).
Google Scholar
Goodwin, S., McPherson, J. D. & McCombie, W. R. Coming of age: ten years of next-generation sequencing technologies. Nat. Rev. Genet. 17, 333 (2016).
Google Scholar
Kent, B. N. et al. Complete bacteriophage transfer in a bacterial endosymbiont (Wolbachia) determined by targeted genome capture. Genome Biol. Evol. 3, 209–218 (2011).
Google Scholar
Blaxter, M. Symbiont Genes in Host Genomes: Fragments with a Future?. Cell Host Microbe 2, 211–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chom.2007.09.008 (2007).
Google Scholar
Nurk, S. et al. HiCanu: accurate assembly of segmental duplications, satellites, and allelic variants from high-fidelity long reads. Genome Res. (2020).
Faddeeva-Vakhrusheva, A. et al. Coping with living in the soil: the genome of the parthenogenetic springtail Folsomia candida. BMC Genomics 18, 493. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-017-3852-x (2017).
Google Scholar
Wolfe, T. M. et al. Comparative genome sequencing reveals insights into the dynamics of Wolbachia in native and invasive cherry fruit flies. Mol. Ecol. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.15923 (2021).
Google Scholar
Neupane, S., Bonilla, S. I., Manalo, A. M. & Pelz-Stelinski, K. S. Near-Complete Genome Sequences of a Wolbachia Strain Isolated from Diaphorina citri Kuwayama Microbiol. Resour. Announc. 9, e00560-e1520. https://doi.org/10.1128/MRA.00560-20 (2020).
Google Scholar
Ellegaard, K. M., Klasson, L., Näslund, K., Bourtzis, K. & Andersson, S. G. Comparative genomics of Wolbachia and the bacterial species concept. PLoS Genet. 9, 1 (2013).
Travers, K. J., Chin, C.-S., Rank, D. R., Eid, J. S. & Turner, S. W. A flexible and efficient template format for circular consensus sequencing and SNP detection. Nucl. Acids Res. 38, e159–e159 (2010).
Google Scholar
Loomis, E. W. et al. Sequencing the unsequenceable: expanded CGG-repeat alleles of the fragile X gene. Genome Res. 23, 121–128 (2013).
Google Scholar
Sinha, A., Li, Z., Sun, L. & Carlow, C. K. Complete Genome Sequence of the Wolbachia wAlbB Endosymbiont of Aedes albopictus. Genome Biol. Evol. 11, 706–720 (2019).
Google Scholar
Vallenet, D. et al. MicroScope: an integrated platform for the annotation and exploration of microbial gene functions through genomic, pangenomic and metabolic comparative analysis. Nucl. Acids Res. 48, D579–D589 (2020).
Google Scholar
Zhang, J. Evolution by gene duplication: An update. Trends Ecol. Evol. 18, 292–298 (2003).
Darling, A. C. E., Mau, B., Blattner, F. R. & Perna, N. T. Mauve: multiple alignment of conserved genomic sequence with rearrangements. Genome Res. 14, 1394–1403. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.2289704 (2004).
Google Scholar
Kampfraath, A. A. et al. Genome expansion of an obligate parthenogenesis-associated Wolbachia poses an exception to the symbiont reduction model. BMC Genom. 20, 106. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-019-5492-9 (2019).
Google Scholar
Brady, A. & Salzberg, S. L. Phymm and PhymmBL: metagenomic phylogenetic classification with interpolated Markov models. Nat. Methods 6, 673–676. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.1358 (2009).
Google Scholar
Parks, D. H., MacDonald, N. J. & Beiko, R. G. Classifying short genomic fragments from novel lineages using composition and homology. BMC Bioinformatics 12, 328. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-12-328 (2011).
Google Scholar
Chandler, M. & Mahillon, J. i Insertion sequences revisited, p. 305–366. In N. L. Craig, R. Craigie, M. Gellert, and A. Lambowitz (ed.), Mobile DNA II. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C. (2002).
Siguier, P., Pérochon, J., Lestrade, L., Mahillon, J. & Chandler, M. ISfinder: the reference centre for bacterial insertion sequences. Nucl. Acids Res. 34, D32–D36 (2006).
Google Scholar
Klasson, L. et al. The mosaic genome structure of the Wolbachia wRi strain infecting Drosophila simulans. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 106, 5725–5730 (2009).
Google Scholar
Canchaya, C., Proux, C., Fournous, G., Bruttin, A. & Brüssow, H. Prophage genomics. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 67, 238–276 (2003).
Google Scholar
Masui, S. et al. Bacteriophage WO and virus-like particles in Wolbachia, an endosymbiont of arthropods. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 283, 1099–1104 (2001).
Google Scholar
Bordenstein, S. R. & Wernegreen, J. J. Bacteriophage Flux in Endosymbionts (Wolbachia): Infection Frequency, Lateral Transfer, and Recombination Rates. Mol. Biol. Evol. 21, 1981–1991. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msh211 (2004).
Google Scholar
Saridaki, A. et al. Wolbachia prophage DNA adenine methyltransferase genes in different Drosophila-Wolbachia associations. PLoS One 6, e19708 (2011).
Google Scholar
Miao, Y.-h., Xiao, J.-h. & Huang, D.-w. Distribution and evolution of the bacteriophage WO and Its antagonism with Wolbachia. Front. Microbial. 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.595629 (2020).
Kent, B. N., Funkhouser, L. J., Setia, S. & Bordenstein, S. R. Evolutionary genomics of a temperate bacteriophage in an obligate intracellular bacteria (Wolbachia). PLoS One 6, e24984 (2011).
Lindsey, A. R. I. et al. Evolutionary genetics of cytoplasmic incompatibility genes cifA and cifB in prophage WO of Wolbachia. Genome Biol. Evol. 10, 434–451 (2018).
Google Scholar
Söding, J., Biegert, A. & Lupas, A. N. The HHpred interactive server for protein homology detection and structure prediction. Nucleic Acids Res. 33, W244–W248. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gki408 (2005).
Google Scholar
Klasson, L. et al. Genome evolution of Wolbachia strain wPip from the Culex pipiens group. Mol. Biol. Evol. 25, 1877–1887 (2008).
Google Scholar
Wu, M. et al. Phylogenomics of the reproductive parasite Wolbachia pipientis wMel: a streamlined genome overrun by mobile genetic elements. PLoS Biol.2, e69 (2004).
McCutcheon, J. P. & Moran, N. A. Extreme genome reduction in symbiotic bacteria. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 10, 13–26. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro2670 (2012).
Google Scholar
Comandatore, F. et al. Supergroup C Wolbachia, mutualist symbionts of filarial nematodes, have a distinct genome structure. Open Biol. 5, 150099 (2015).
Google Scholar
Lo, W.-S., Huang, Y.-Y. & Kuo, C.-H. Winding paths to simplicity: genome evolution in facultative insect symbionts. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 40, 855–874. https://doi.org/10.1093/femsre/fuw028 (2016).
Google Scholar
Unterholzner, S. J., Poppenberger, B. & Rozhon, W. Toxin–antitoxin systems. Mob. Genet. Elements. 3, e26219. https://doi.org/10.4161/mge.26219 (2013).
Google Scholar
Fallon, A. M. Computational evidence for antitoxins associated with RelE/ParE, RatA, Fic, and AbiEii-family toxins in Wolbachia genomes. Mol. Genet. Genomics 295, 891–909. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00438-020-01662-0 (2020).
Google Scholar
Gonzalez-Rivera, C., Bhatty, M. & Christie, P. J. Mechanism and function of type IV secretion during infection of the human host. Microbiol. Spectr. 4 (2016).
Rancès, E., Voronin, D., Tran-Van, V. & Mavingui, P. Genetic and functional characterization of the type IV secretion system in Wolbachia. J. Bacteriol. 190, 5020–5030 (2008).
Google Scholar
Pichon, S. et al. Conservation of the Type IV secretion system throughout Wolbachia evolution. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 385, 557–562 (2009).
Google Scholar
Bing, X.-L., Zhao, D.-S., Sun, J.-T., Zhang, K.-J. & Hong, X.-Y. Genomic Analysis of Wolbachia from Laodelphax striatellus (Delphacidae, Hemiptera) Reveals Insights into Its “Jekyll and Hyde” Mode of Infection Pattern. Genom. Biol. Evol. 12, 3818–3831. https://doi.org/10.1093/gbe/evaa006 (2020).
Google Scholar
Ramírez-Puebla, S. T. et al. Genomes of Candidatus Wolbachia bourtzisii wDacA and Candidatus Wolbachia pipientis wDacB from the Cochineal Insect Dactylopius coccus (Hemiptera: Dactylopiidae). G3-Genes Genom. Genet. 6, 3343–3349. https://doi.org/10.1534/g3.116.031237 (2016).
Google Scholar
Newton, I. L. G. et al. Comparative genomics of two closely related Wolbachia with different reproductive effects on hosts. Genom. Biol. Evol. 8, 1526–1542. https://doi.org/10.1093/gbe/evw096 (2016).
Google Scholar
Pritchard, L., Glover, R. H., Humphris, S., Elphinstone, J. G. & Toth, I. K. Genomics and taxonomy in diagnostics for food security: Soft-rotting enterobacterial plant pathogens. Anal. Methods. 8, 12–24 (2016).
Eren, A. M. et al. Anvi’o: An advanced analysis and visualization platform for ‘omics data. PeerJ 3, e1319. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1319 (2015).
Google Scholar
Baldo, L. et al. Multilocus sequence typing system for the endosymbiont Wolbachia pipientis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 72, 7098. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.00731-06 (2006).
Google Scholar
Bleidorn, C. & Gerth, M. A critical re-evaluation of multilocus sequence typing (MLST) efforts in Wolbachia. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 94, 1. https://doi.org/10.1093/femsec/fix163 (2018).
Google Scholar
Wang, X. et al. Phylogenomic analysis of Wolbachia strains reveals patterns of genome evolution and recombination. Genom. Biol. Evol. 12, 2508–2520. https://doi.org/10.1093/gbe/evaa219 (2020).
Google Scholar
Pérez-Losada, M., Cabezas, P., Castro-Nallar, E. & Crandall, K. A. Pathogen typing in the genomics era: MLST and the future of molecular epidemiology. Infect. Genet. Evol. 16, 38–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meegid.2013.01.009 (2013).
Google Scholar
Glowska, E., Dragun-Damian, A., Dabert, M. & Gerth, M. New Wolbachia supergroups detected in quill mites (Acari: Syringophilidae Infect. Genet. Evol. 30, 140–146 (2015).
Chung, M., Munro, J. B., Tettelin, H. & Dunning Hotopp, J. C. Using Core Genome Alignments To Assign Bacterial Species. mSystems 3, e00236–00218. https://doi.org/10.1128/mSystems.00236-18 (2018).
Vasconcelos, E. J. et al. Assessing cat flea microbiomes in Northern and Southern California by 16S rRNA next-generation sequencing. Vector Borne Zoonot. Dis. 18, 491–499 (2018).
Campbell, J. H. et al. UGA is an additional glycine codon in uncultured SR1 bacteria from the human microbiota. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 110, 5540–5545 (2013).
Google Scholar
Nguyen, L.-T., Schmidt, H. A., Von Haeseler, A. & Minh, B. Q. IQ-TREE: a fast and effective stochastic algorithm for estimating maximum-likelihood phylogenies. Mol. Biol. Evol. 32, 268–274 (2015).
Google Scholar
Lefoulon, E. et al. Large Enriched Fragment Targeted Sequencing (LEFT-SEQ) Applied to Capture of Wolbachia Genomes. Sci. Rep. 9, 5939 (2019).
Google Scholar
Geniez, S. et al. Targeted genome enrichment for efficient purification of endosymbiont DNA from host DNA. Symbiosis 58, 201-207. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13199-012-0215-x (2012).
Google Scholar
Dunning Hotopp, J. C., Slatko, B. E. & Foster, J. M. Targeted enrichment and sequencing of recent endosymbiont-host lateral gene transfers. Sci. Rep. 7, 857-857. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-00814-4 (2017).
Google Scholar
Basting, P. J. & Bergman, C. M. Complete genome assemblies for three variants of the Wolbachia endosymbiont of Drosophila melanogaster. Microbiol. Resour. Announc. 8, 1 (2019).
Wang, X. et al. Genome assembly of the A-Group Wolbachia in Nasonia oneida using linked-reads technology. Genom. Biol. Evol. 11, 3008–3013. https://doi.org/10.1093/gbe/evz223 (2019).
Google Scholar
Rasgon, J. L., Ren, X. & Petridis, M. Can anopheles gambiae Be infected with Wolbachia pipientis? Insights from an in vitro system. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 72, 7718. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01578-06 (2006).
Google Scholar
Dobson, S. L., Marsland, E. J., Veneti, Z., Bourtzis, K. & O’Neill, S. L. Characterization of Wolbachia host cell range via the in vitro establishment of infections. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 68, 656–660 (2002).
Google Scholar
Baum, B. & Cherbas, L. Drosophila cell lines as model systems and as an experimental tool, pp. 391–424 in Drosophila. 391–424 (Springer, 2008).
Rasgon, J. L., Gamston, C. E. & Ren, X. Survival of Wolbachia pipientis in cell-free medium. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 72, 6934–6937 (2006).
Google Scholar
Koren, S. et al. Canu: Scalable and accurate long-read assembly via adaptive k-mer weighting and repeat separation. Genome Res. 27, 722–736 (2017).
Google Scholar
Hunt, M. et al. Circlator: automated circularization of genome assemblies using long sequencing reads. Genome Biol. 16, 294 (2015).
Google Scholar
Watson, M. & Warr, A. Errors in long-read assemblies can critically affect protein prediction. Nat. Biotechnol. 37, 124–126. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-018-0004-z (2019).
Google Scholar
Walker, B. J. et al. Pilon: an integrated tool for comprehensive microbial variant detection and genome assembly improvement. PloS One 9 (2014).
Bolger, A. M., Lohse, M. & Usadel, B. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 30, 2114–2120 (2014).
Google Scholar
Andrews, S. FastQC: a quality control tool for high throughput sequence data. Available online at: http://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc (2010).
Li, H. & Durbin, R. Fast and accurate long-read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 26, 589–595 (2010).
Google Scholar
Tatusova, T. et al. NCBI prokaryotic genome annotation pipeline. Nucl. Acids. Res. 44, 6614–6624 (2016).
Google Scholar
Simão, F. A., Waterhouse, R. M., Ioannidis, P., Kriventseva, E. V. & Zdobnov, E. M. BUSCO: Assessing genome assembly and annotation completeness with single-copy orthologs. Bioinformatics 31, 3210–3212 (2015).
Google Scholar
Parks, D. H., Imelfort, M., Skennerton, C. T., Hugenholtz, P. & Tyson, G. W. CheckM: Assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes. Genome Res. 25, 1043–1055 (2015).
Google Scholar
Huerta-Cepas, J. et al. Fast genome-wide functional annotation through orthology assignment by eggNOG-mapper. Mol. Biol. Evol. 34, 2115–2122 (2017).
Google Scholar
Huerta-Cepas, J. et al. eggNOG 4.5: a hierarchical orthology framework with improved functional annotations for eukaryotic, prokaryotic and viral sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, D286-D293 (2015).
Karp, P. D. et al. Pathway Tools version 13.0: integrated software for pathway/genome informatics and systems biology. Brief. Bioinform. 11, 40–79 (2010).
Google Scholar
Vallenet, D. et al. MicroScope in 2017: an expanding and evolving integrated resource for community expertise of microbial genomes. Nucl. Acids Res. 45, D517–D528. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkw1101 (2017).
Google Scholar
Grant, J. R. & Stothard, P. The CGView Server: A comparative genomics tool for circular genomes. Nucl. Acids Res. 36, W181–W184. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkn179 (2008).
Google Scholar
Miele, V., Penel, S. & Duret, L. Ultra-fast sequence clustering from similarity networks with SiLiX. BMC Bioinformatic.s 12, 116–116. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-12-116 (2011).
Krumsiek, J., Arnold, R. & Rattei, T. Gepard: A rapid and sensitive tool for creating dotplots on genome scale. Bioinformatics 23, 1026–1028. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btm039 (2007).
Google Scholar
Finn, R. D. et al. The Pfam protein families database: Towards a more sustainable future. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, D279–D285 (2015).
Google Scholar
Arndt, D. et al. PHASTER: a better, faster version of the PHAST phage search tool. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, W16–W21 (2016).
Google Scholar
Varani, A. M., Siguier, P., Gourbeyre, E., Charneau, V. & Chandler, M. ISsaga is an ensemble of web-based methods for high throughput identification and semi-automatic annotation of insertion sequences in prokaryotic genomes. Genome Biol. 12, R30 (2011).
Google Scholar
Sanogo, Y. O. & Dobson, S. L. WO bacteriophage transcription in Wolbachia-infected Culex pipiens. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 36, 80–85 (2006).
Google Scholar
Bordenstein, S. R., Marshall, M. L., Fry, A. J., Kim, U. & Wernegreen, J. J. The Tripartite Associations between Bacteriophage, Wolbachia, and Arthropods. PLOS Pathog. 2, e43. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.0020043 (2006).
Google Scholar
Sinkins, S. P. et al. Wolbachia variability and host effects on crossing type in Culex mosquitoes. Nat. Biotechnol. 436, 257–260 (2005).
Google Scholar
Klasson, L. et al. Genome evolution of Wolbachia strain wPip from the Culex pipiens group. Mol. Evol. Evol. 25, 1877–1887 (2008).
Google Scholar
Gerth, M. & Bleidorn, C. Comparative genomics provides a timeframe for Wolbachia evolution and exposes a recent biotin synthesis operon transfer. Nat. Microb. 2, 1–7 (2016).
Foster, J. et al. The Wolbachia genome of Brugia malayi: endosymbiont evolution within a human pathogenic nematode. PLoS Biol. 3 (2005).
Pichon, S. Type IV secretion system and ankyrin domain-containing proteins in Wolbachia-arthropods interactions, Université de Poitiers (2009).
Metcalf, J. A., Jo, M., Bordenstein, S. R., Jaenike, J. & Bordenstein, S. R. Recent genome reduction of Wolbachia in Drosophila recens targets phage WO and narrows candidates for reproductive parasitism. PeerJ 2, e529 (2014).
Kim, D., Song, L., Breitwieser, F. P. & Salzberg, S. L. Centrifuge: Rapid and sensitive classification of metagenomic sequences. Genome Res. 26, 1721–1729 (2016).
Google Scholar
Emms, D. M. & Kelly, S. OrthoFinder: Solving fundamental biases in whole genome comparisons dramatically improves orthogroup inference accuracy. Genome Biol. 16, 157. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-015-0721-2 (2015).
Google Scholar
Khan, A. & Mathelier, A. Intervene: A tool for intersection and visualization of multiple gene or genomic region sets. BMC Bioinformatics 18, 287. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12859-017-1708-7 (2017).
Google Scholar
Edgar, R. C. MUSCLE: Multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucl. Acids Res. 32, 1792–1797 (2004).
Google Scholar
Kalyaanamoorthy, S., Minh, B. Q., Wong, T. K. F., Von Haeseler, A. & Jermiin, L. S. ModelFinder: Fast model selection for accurate phylogenetic estimates. Nat. Methods. 14, 587–589 (2017).
Google Scholar
Zhang, D. et al. PhyloSuite: An integrated and scalable desktop platform for streamlined molecular sequence data management and evolutionary phylogenetics studies. Mol. Ecol. Res. 20, 348–355 (2020).
Letunic, I. & Bork, P. Interactive tree of life (iTOL) v3: An online tool for the display and annotation of phylogenetic and other trees. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, W242–W245 (2016).
Google Scholar
