Preloader

Bioengineering approaches to treat the failing heart: from cell biology to 3D printing

  • 1.

    Walker, C. A. & Spinale, F. G. The structure and function of the cardiac myocyte: a review of fundamental concepts. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 118, 375–382 (1999).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 2.

    Chien, K. R., Domian, I. J. & Parker, K. K. Cardiogenesis and the complex biology of regenerative cardiovascular medicine. Science 322, 1494–1497 (2008).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 3.

    Hirose, K. et al. Evidence for hormonal control of heart regenerative capacity during endothermy acquisition. Science 364, 184–188 (2019).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 4.

    Curfman, G. Stem cell therapy for heart failure: an unfulfilled promise? JAMA 321, 1186–1187 (2019).

    PubMed 
    Article 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 5.

    Miller, L., Birks, E., Guglin, M., Lamba, H. & Frazier, O. Use of ventricular assist devices and heart transplantation for advanced heart failure. Circ. Res. 124, 1658–1678 (2019).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 6.

    Benjamin, M. A. et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics — 2017 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation 135, e146–e603 (2017).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 7.

    Lawson, E. J. et al. 20-year trends in cause-specific heart failure outcomes by sex, socioeconomic status, and place of diagnosis: a population-based study. Lancet Public Health 4, e406–e420 (2019).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 8.

    Mamas, M. A. et al. Do patients have worse outcomes in heart failure than in cancer? A primary care-based cohort study with 10-year follow-up in Scotland. Eur. J. Heart Fail. 19, 1095–1104 (2017).

    PubMed 
    Article 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 9.

    Bianco, P. et al. The meaning, the sense and the significance: translating the science of mesenchymal stem cells into medicine. Nat. Med. 19, 35–42 (2013).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 10.

    Madonna, R. et al. Position paper of the European Society of Cardiology Working Group Cellular Biology of the Heart: cell-based therapies for myocardial repair and regeneration in ischemic heart disease and heart failure. Eur. Heart J. 37, 1789–1798 (2016).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 11.

    Litviňuková, M. et al. Cells of the adult human heart. Nature 588, 466–472 (2020).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • 12.

    Karantalis, V. et al. Autologous mesenchymal stem cells produce concordant improvements in regional function, tissue perfusion, and fibrotic burden when administered to patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting: the Prospective Randomized Study of Mesenchymal Stem Cell Therapy in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery (PROMETHEUS) trial. Circ. Res. 114, 1302–1310 (2014).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 13.

    Heldman, A. W. et al. Transendocardial mesenchymal stem cells and mononuclear bone marrow cells for ischemic cardiomyopathy: the TAC-HFT randomized trial. JAMA 311, 62–73 (2014).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 14.

    Makkar, R. R. et al. Intracoronary cardiosphere-derived cells for heart regeneration after myocardial infarction (CADUCEUS): a prospective, randomised phase 1 trial. Lancet 379, 895–904 (2012).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 15.

    Gnecchi, M. et al. Paracrine action accounts for marked protection of ischemic heart by Akt-modified mesenchymal stem cells. Nat. Med. 11, 367–368 (2005).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 16.

    Noiseux, N. et al. Mesenchymal stem cells overexpressing Akt dramatically repair infarcted myocardium and improve cardiac function despite infrequent cellular fusion or differentiation. Mol. Ther. 14, 840–850 (2006).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 17.

    Zeng, L. et al. Bioenergetic and functional consequences of bone marrow-derived multipotent progenitor cell transplantation in hearts with postinfarction left ventricular remodeling. Circulation 115, 1866–1875 (2007).

    PubMed 
    Article 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 18.

    Iso, Y. et al. Multipotent human stromal cells improve cardiac function after myocardial infarction in mice without long-term engraftment. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 354, 700–706 (2007).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 19.

    Kehat, I. et al. Human embryonic stem cells can differentiate into myocytes with structural and functional properties of cardiomyocytes. J. Clin. Invest. 108, 407–414 (2001).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 20.

    Shiba, Y. et al. Allogeneic transplantation of iPS cell-derived cardiomyocytes regenerates primate hearts. Nature 538, 388–391 (2016).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 21.

    Shiba, Y. et al. Human ES-cell-derived cardiomyocytes electrically couple and suppress arrhythmias in injured hearts. Nature 489, 322–325 (2012).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 22.

    Chong, J. J. et al. Human embryonic-stem-cell-derived cardiomyocytes regenerate non-human primate hearts. Nature 510, 273–277 (2014).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 23.

    Guo, Y. & Pu, W. T. Cardiomyocyte maturation: new phase in development. Circ. Res. 126, 1086–1106 (2020).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 24.

    Nussbaum, J. et al. Transplantation of undifferentiated murine embryonic stem cells in the heart: teratoma formation and immune response. FASEB J. 21, 1345–1357 (2007).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 25.

    Takahashi, K. et al. Induction of pluripotent stem cells from adult human fibroblasts by defined factors. Cell 131, 861–872 (2007).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 26.

    Zhou, H. et al. Generation of induced pluripotent stem cells using recombinant proteins. Cell Stem Cell 4, 381–384 (2009).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 27.

    Li, X., Zhang, P., Wei, C. & Zhang, Y. Generation of pluripotent stem cells via protein transduction. Int. J. Dev. Biol. 58, 21–27 (2014).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 28.

    Zhou, Y. & Zeng, F. Integration-free methods for generating induced pluripotent stem cells. Genomics Proteom. Bioinforma. 11, 284–287 (2013).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 29.

    Singh, V. K., Kumar, N., Kalsan, M., Saini, A. & Chandra, R. Mechanism of induction: induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs). J. Stem Cells 10, 43–62 (2015).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 30.

    Schlaeger, T. M. et al. A comparison of non-integrating reprogramming methods. Nat. Biotechnol. 33, 58–63 (2015).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 31.

    Higuchi, A. et al. Generation of pluripotent stem cells without the use of genetic material. Lab. Invest. 95, 26–42 (2015).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 32.

    Zhang, J. et al. Functional cardiomyocytes derived from human induced pluripotent stem cells. Circ. Res. 104, e30–e41 (2009).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 33.

    Wang, G. et al. Modeling the mitochondrial cardiomyopathy of Barth syndrome with induced pluripotent stem cell and heart-on-chip technologies. Nat. Med. 20, 616–623 (2014).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 34.

    Zhao, W. et al. Strategies for genetically engineering hypoimmunogenic Universal Pluripotent stem cells. iScience 23, 101162 (2020).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 35.

    Palpant, N. J. et al. Generating high-purity cardiac and endothelial derivatives from patterned mesoderm using human pluripotent stem cells. Nat. Protoc. 12, 15–31 (2017).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 36.

    Lian, X. et al. Directed cardiomyocyte differentiation from human pluripotent stem cells by modulating Wnt/β-catenin signaling under fully defined conditions. Nat. Protoc. 8, 162–175 (2013).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 37.

    Chen, V. C. et al. Development of a scalable suspension culture for cardiac differentiation from human pluripotent stem cells. Stem Cell Res. 15, 365–375 (2015).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 38.

    Jha, B. S., Farnoodian, M. & Bharti, K. Regulatory considerations for developing a phase I investigational new drug application for autologous induced pluripotent stem cells-based therapy product. Stem Cell Transl. Med. 10, 198–208 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 39.

    Chen, Z. et al. Subtype-specific promoter-driven action potential imaging for precise disease modelling and drug testing in hiPSC-derived cardiomyocytes. Eur. Heart J. 38, 292–301 (2017).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 40.

    He, J.-Q., Ma, Y., Lee, Y., Thomson, J. A. & Kamp, T. J. Human embryonic stem cells develop into multiple types of cardiac myocytes: action potential characterization. Circ. Res. 93, 32–39 (2003).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 41.

    Cyganek, L. et al. Deep phenotyping of human induced pluripotent stem cell–derived atrial and ventricular cardiomyocytes. JCI Insight 3, e99941 (2018).

    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 42.

    Protze, S. I. et al. Sinoatrial node cardiomyocytes derived from human pluripotent cells function as a biological pacemaker. Nat. Biotechnol. 35, 56–68 (2017).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 43.

    Laksman, Z. et al. Modeling atrial fibrillation using human embryonic stem cell-derived atrial tissue. Sci. Rep. 7, 5268 (2017).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • 44.

    Bizy, A. et al. Myosin light chain 2-based selection of human iPSC-derived early ventricular cardiac myocytes. Stem Cell Res. 11, 1335–1347 (2013).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 45.

    Goldfracht, I. et al. Generating ring-shaped engineered heart tissues from ventricular and atrial human pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes. Nat. Commun. 11, 75 (2020).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 46.

    Zhao, Y. et al. A platform for generation of chamber-specific cardiac tissues and disease modeling. Cell 176, 913–927 (2019).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 47.

    Devalla, H. D. et al. Atrial-like cardiomyocytes from human pluripotent stem cells are a robust preclinical model for assessing atrial-selective pharmacology. EMBO Mol. Med. 7, 394–410 (2015).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 48.

    Yang, X., Pabon, L. & Murry, C. E. Engineering adolescence: maturation of human pluripotent stem cell–derived cardiomyocytes. Circ. Res. 114, 511–523 (2014).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 49.

    Heineke, J. & Molkentin, J. D. Regulation of cardiac hypertrophy by intracellular signalling pathways. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 7, 589–600 (2006).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 50.

    Mummery, C. L. et al. Differentiation of human embryonic stem cells and induced pluripotent stem cells to cardiomyocytes: a methods overview. Circ. Res. 111, 344–358 (2012).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 51.

    Zwi, L. et al. Cardiomyocyte differentiation of human induced pluripotent stem cells. Circulation 120, 1513–1523 (2009).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 52.

    Sartiani, L. et al. Developmental changes in cardiomyocytes differentiated from human embryonic stem cells: a molecular and electrophysiological approach. Stem Cell 25, 1136–1144 (2007).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 53.

    Dias, T. P. et al. Biophysical study of human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocyte structural maturation during long-term culture. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 499, 611–617 (2018).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 54.

    Lundy, S. D., Zhu, W.-Z., Regnier, M. & Laflamme, M. A. Structural and functional maturation of cardiomyocytes derived from human pluripotent stem cells. Stem Cell Dev. 22, 1991–2002 (2013).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 55.

    Besser, R. R. et al. Engineered microenvironments for maturation of stem cell derived cardiac myocytes. Theranostics 8, 124–140 (2018).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 56.

    Hazeltine, L. B. et al. Effects of substrate mechanics on contractility of cardiomyocytes generated from human pluripotent stem cells. Int. J. Cell Biol. 2012, 508294 (2012).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • 57.

    Xi, Y. et al. Substrate stiffness alters human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocyte differentiation and maturation. Circulation 140, A17119 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  • 58.

    McCain, M. L., Yuan, H., Pasqualini, F. S., Campbell, P. H. & Parker, K. K. Matrix elasticity regulates the optimal cardiac myocyte shape for contractility. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 306, H1525–H1539 (2014).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 59.

    Bhana, B. et al. Influence of substrate stiffness on the phenotype of heart cells. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 105, 1148–1160 (2010).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 60.

    Radisic, M. et al. Functional assembly of engineered myocardium by electrical stimulation of cardiac myocytes cultured on scaffolds. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 18129–18134 (2004).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 61.

    Eng, G. et al. Autonomous beating rate adaptation in human stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes. Nat. Commun. 7, 10312 (2016).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 62.

    Jackman, C. P., Carlson, A. L. & Bursac, N. Dynamic culture yields engineered myocardium with near-adult functional output. Biomaterials 111, 66–79 (2016).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 63.

    Tulloch, N. L. et al. Growth of engineered human myocardium with mechanical loading and vascular coculture. Circ. Res. 109, 47–59 (2011).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 64.

    Ronaldson-Bouchard, K. et al. Advanced maturation of human cardiac tissue grown from pluripotent stem cells. Nature 556, 239–243 (2018).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 65.

    Tiburcy, M. et al. Defined engineered human myocardium with advanced maturation for applications in heart failure modeling and repair. Circulation 135, 1832–1847 (2017).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 66.

    Zuppinger, C. 3D culture for cardiac cells. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1863, 1873–1881 (2016).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 67.

    Bargehr, J. et al. Epicardial cells derived from human embryonic stem cells augment cardiomyocyte-driven heart regeneration. Nat. Biotechnol. 37, 895–906 (2019).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 68.

    Ravenscroft, S. M., Pointon, A., Williams, A. W., Cross, M. J. & Sidaway, J. E. Cardiac non-myocyte cells show enhanced pharmacological function suggestive of contractile maturity in stem cell derived cardiomyocyte microtissues. Toxicol. Sci. 152, 99–112 (2016).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 69.

    Giacomelli, E. et al. Three-dimensional cardiac microtissues composed of cardiomyocytes and endothelial cells co-differentiated from human pluripotent stem cells. Development 144, 1008–1017 (2017).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 70.

    Correia, C. et al. Distinct carbon sources affect structural and functional maturation of cardiomyocytes derived from human pluripotent stem cells. Sci. Rep. 7, 8590 (2017).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • 71.

    Nakano, H. et al. Glucose inhibits cardiac muscle maturation through nucleotide biosynthesis. Elife 6, e29330 (2017).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 72.

    Mills, R. J. et al. Functional screening in human cardiac organoids reveals a metabolic mechanism for cardiomyocyte cell cycle arrest. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, E8372–E8381 (2017).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 73.

    Yang, X. et al. Fatty acids enhance the maturation of cardiomyocytes derived from human pluripotent stem cells. Stem Cell Rep. 13, 657–668 (2019).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 74.

    Yang, X. et al. Tri-iodo-l-thyronine promotes the maturation of human cardiomyocytes-derived from induced pluripotent stem cells. J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol. 72, 296–304 (2014).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 75.

    Parikh, S. S. et al. Thyroid and glucocorticoid hormones promote functional T-tubule development in human-induced pluripotent stem cell–derived cardiomyocytes. Circ. Res. 121, 1323–1330 (2017).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 76.

    Földes, G. et al. Modulation of human embryonic stem cell-derived cardiomyocyte growth: a testbed for studying human cardiac hypertrophy? J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol. 50, 367–376 (2011).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • 77.

    Wu, L. et al. Angiotensin II promotes cardiac differentiation of embryonic stem cells via angiotensin type 1 receptor. Differentiation 86, 23–29 (2013).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 78.

    Rupert, C. E. & Coulombe, K. L. IGF1 and NRG1 enhance proliferation, metabolic maturity, and the force-frequency response in hESC-derived engineered cardiac tissues. Stem Cell Int. 2017, 7648409 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  • 79.

    Sheehy, S. P. et al. Quality metrics for stem cell-derived cardiac myocytes. Stem Cell Rep. 2, 282–294 (2014).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 80.

    Karbassi, E. et al. Cardiomyocyte maturation: advances in knowledge and implications for regenerative medicine. Nat. Rev. Cardiol. 17, 341–359 (2020).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 81.

    Reinecke, H., Zhang, M., Bartosek, T. & Murry, C. E. Survival, integration, and differentiation of cardiomyocyte grafts: a study in normal and injured rat hearts. Circulation 100, 193–202 (1999).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 82.

    Kuo, P.-L. et al. Myocyte shape regulates lateral registry of sarcomeres and contractility. Am. J. Pathol. 181, 2030–2037 (2012).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 83.

    Clark, K. A., McElhinny, A. S., Beckerle, M. C. & Gregorio, C. C. Striated muscle cytoarchitecture: an intricate web of form and function. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 18, 637–706 (2002).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 84.

    LeDuc, P. P. & Bellin, R. R. Nanoscale intracellular organization and functional architecture mediating cellular behavior. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 34, 102–113 (2006).

    PubMed 
    Article 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 85.

    Geisse, N. A., Sheehy, S. P. & Parker, K. K. Control of myocyte remodeling in vitro with engineered substrates. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. Anim. 45, 343–350 (2009).

    PubMed 
    Article 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 86.

    Ribeiro, A. J. et al. Contractility of single cardiomyocytes differentiated from pluripotent stem cells depends on physiological shape and substrate stiffness. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 12705–12710 (2015).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 87.

    McCain, M. L., Sheehy, S. P., Grosberg, A., Goss, J. A. & Parker, K. K. Recapitulating maladaptive, multiscale remodeling of failing myocardium on a chip. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 9770–9775 (2013).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 88.

    Schroer, A., Pardon, G., Castillo, E., Blair, C. & Pruitt, B. Engineering hiPSC cardiomyocyte in vitro model systems for functional and structural assessment. Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol. 144, 3–15 (2019).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 89.

    Yuan, H., Marzban, B. & Kit Parker, K. Myofibrils in cardiomyocytes tend to assemble along the maximal principle stress directions. J. Biomech. Eng. 139, 1210101–1210108 (2017).

    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 90.

    Zhao, G., Bao, X., Huang, G., Xu, F. & Zhang, X. Differential effects of directional cyclic stretching on the functionalities of engineered cardiac tissues. ACS Appl. Bio. Mater. 2, 3508–3519 (2019).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 91.

    Parker, K. K., Tan, J., Chen, C. S. & Tung, L. Myofibrillar architecture in engineered cardiac myocytes. Circ. Res. 103, 340–342 (2008).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 92.

    Matsuda, T. et al. N-cadherin-mediated cell adhesion determines the plasticity for cell alignment in response to mechanical stretch in cultured cardiomyocytes. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 326, 228–232 (2005).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 93.

    Kada, K. et al. Orientation change of cardiocytes induced by cyclic stretch stimulation: time dependency and involvement of protein kinases. J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol. 31, 247–259 (1999).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 94.

    Badie, N. & Bursac, N. Novel micropatterned cardiac cell cultures with realistic ventricular microstructure. Biophys. J. 96, 3873–3885 (2009).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 95.

    Fleischer, S. et al. Albumin fiber scaffolds for engineering functional cardiac tissues. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 111, 1246–1257 (2014).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 96.

    Orlova, Y., Magome, N., Liu, L., Chen, Y. & Agladze, K. Electrospun nanofibers as a tool for architecture control in engineered cardiac tissue. Biomaterials 32, 5615–5624 (2011).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 97.

    Nawroth, J. C. et al. Automated fabrication of photopatterned gelatin hydrogels for organ-on-chips applications. Biofabrication 10, 025004 (2018).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • 98.

    Bursac, N., Loo, Y., Leong, K. & Tung, L. Novel anisotropic engineered cardiac tissues: studies of electrical propagation. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 361, 847–853 (2007).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 99.

    Bursac, N., Parker, K., Iravanian, S. & Tung, L. Cardiomyocyte cultures with controlled macroscopic anisotropy: a model for functional electrophysiological studies of cardiac muscle. Circ. Res. 91, e45–e54 (2002).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 100.

    Benam, K. H. et al. Engineered in vitro disease models. Annu. Rev. Pathol. 10, 195–262 (2015).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 101.

    Saleem, U. et al. Blinded, multicenter evaluation of drug-induced changes in contractility using human-induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes. Toxicol. Sci. 176, 103–123 (2020).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 102.

    Yadid, M. et al. Endothelial extracellular vesicles contain protective proteins and rescue ischemia-reperfusion injury in a human heart-on-chip. Sci. Transl. Med. 12, eaax8005 (2020).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 103.

    Stein, J. M., Mummery, C. L. & Bellin, M. Engineered models of the human heart: directions and challenges. Stem Cell Rep. 3, S2213–S6711 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  • 104.

    Ogle, B. M. et al. Distilling complexity to advance cardiac tissue engineering. Sci. Trans. Med. 8, 342ps313 (2016).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • 105.

    Naveed, M. et al. Cardio-supportive devices (VRD & DCC device) and patches for advanced heart failure: a review, summary of state of the art and future directions. Biomed. Pharmacother. 102, 41–54 (2018).

    PubMed 
    Article 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 106.

    Chachques, J. C. et al. Myocardial assistance by grafting a new bioartificial upgraded myocardium (MAGNUM trial): clinical feasibility study. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 85, 901–908 (2008).

    PubMed 
    Article 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 107.

    Menasché, P. et al. Human embryonic stem cell-derived cardiac progenitors for heart failure. one-year results of the ESCORT Trial. Circulation 136, A14798 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  • 108.

    Menasche, P. et al. Human embryonic stem cell-derived cardiac progenitors for severe heart failure treatment: first clinical case report. Eur. Heart J. 36, 2011–2017 (2015).

    PubMed 
    Article 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 109.

    Riegler, J. et al. Human engineered heart muscles engraft and survive long term in a rodent myocardial infarction model. Circ. Res. 117, 720–730 (2015).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 110.

    Weinberger, F. et al. Cardiac repair in guinea pigs with human engineered heart tissue from induced pluripotent stem cells. Sci. Transl. Med. 8, 363ra148 (2016).

    PubMed 
    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 111.

    Capulli, A., MacQueen, L., Sheehy, S. P. & Parker, K. Fibrous scaffolds for building hearts and heart parts. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 96, 83–102 (2016).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 112.

    Fleischer, S., Miller, J., Hurowitz, H., Shapira, A. & Dvir, T. Effect of fiber diameter on the assembly of functional 3D cardiac patches. Nanotechnology 26, 291002 (2015).

    PubMed 
    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 113.

    Fleischer, S., Shapira, A., Feiner, R. & Dvir, T. Modular assembly of thick multifunctional cardiac patches. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 114, 1898–1903 (2017).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 114.

    Adadi, N. et al. Electrospun fibrous PVDF-TrFe scaffolds for cardiac tissue engineering, differentiation, and maturation. Adv. Mater. Technol. 5, 1900820 (2020).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 115.

    Tan, G. Z. & Zhou, Y. Electrospinning of biomimetic fibrous scaffolds for tissue engineering: a review. Int. J. Polymeric Mater. Polymeric Biomater. 69, 947–960 (2020).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 116.

    Armstrong, J. P. et al. Engineering anisotropic muscle tissue using acoustic cell patterning. Adv. Mater. 30, e1802649 (2018).

    PubMed 
    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 117.

    Naseer, S. M. et al. Surface acoustic waves induced micropatterning of cells in gelatin methacryloyl (GelMA) hydrogels. Biofabrication 9, 015020 (2017).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • 118.

    Serpooshan, V. et al. Bioacoustic-enabled patterning of human iPSC-derived cardiomyocytes into 3D cardiac tissue. Biomaterials 131, 47–57 (2017).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 119.

    Zwi-Dantsis, L. et al. Remote magnetic nanoparticle manipulation enables the dynamic patterning of cardiac tissues. Adv. Mater. 32, e1904598 (2020).

    PubMed 
    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 120.

    Gao, L. et al. Myocardial tissue engineering with cells derived from human-induced pluripotent stem cells and a native-like, high-resolution, 3-dimensionally printed scaffold. Circ. Res. 120, 1318–1325 (2017).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 121.

    Kuetemeyer, K. et al. Two-photon induced collagen cross-linking in bioartificial cardiac tissue. Opt. Express 19, 15996–16007 (2011).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 122.

    Ma, Z. et al. Three-dimensional filamentous human diseased cardiac tissue model. Biomaterials 35, 1367–1377 (2014).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 123.

    Castilho, M. et al. Melt electrospinning writing of poly-Hydroxymethylglycolide-co-ε-Caprolactone-based scaffolds for cardiac tissue engineering. Adv. Healthc. Mater. https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201700311 (2017).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 124.

    Mao, M., He, J., Li, Z., Han, K. & Li, D. Multi-directional cellular alignment in 3D guided by electrohydrodynamically-printed microlattices. Acta Biomater. 101, 141–151 (2020).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 125.

    Liau, B., Christoforou, N., Leong, K. W. & Bursac, N. Pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiac tissue patch with advanced structure and function. Biomaterials 32, 9180–9187 (2011).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 126.

    Huang, N. F. et al. Big bottlenecks in cardiovascular tissue engineering. Commun. Biol. 1, 199 (2018).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • 127.

    Dvir, T. et al. Nanowired three-dimensional cardiac patches. Nat. Nanotechnol. 6, 720–725 (2011).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 128.

    Shevach, M., Maoz, B. M., Feiner, R., Shapira, A. & Dvir, T. Nanoengineering gold particle composite fibers for cardiac tissue engineering. J. Mater. Chem. B. 1, 5210–5217 (2013).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 129.

    Martins, A. M. et al. Electrically conductive chitosan/carbon scaffolds for cardiac tissue engineering. Biomacromolecules 15, 635–643 (2014).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 130.

    Liang, S. et al. Paintable and rapidly bondable conductive hydrogels as therapeutic cardiac patches. Adv. Mater. 30, e1704235 (2018).

    PubMed 
    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 131.

    Navaei, A. et al. Gold nanorod-incorporated gelatin-based conductive hydrogels for engineering cardiac tissue constructs. Acta Biomater. 41, 133–146 (2016).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 132.

    Shin, S. R. et al. Reduced graphene oxide-gelMA hybrid hydrogels as scaffolds for cardiac tissue engineering. Small 12, 3677–3689 (2016).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 133.

    Roshanbinfar, K. et al. Carbon nanotube doped pericardial matrix derived electroconductive biohybrid hydrogel for cardiac tissue engineering. Biomater. Sci. 7, 3906–3917 (2019).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 134.

    Yadid, M., Feiner, R. & Dvir, T. Gold nanoparticle-integrated scaffolds for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. Nano Lett. 19, 2198–2206 (2019).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 135.

    Zhao, R., Boudou, T., Wang, W. G., Chen, C. S. & Reich, D. H. Decoupling cell and matrix mechanics in engineered microtissues using magnetically actuated microcantilevers. Adv. Mater. 25, 1699–1705 (2013).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 136.

    Malki, M., Fleischer, S., Shapira, A. & Dvir, T. Gold nanorod-based engineered cardiac patch for suture-free engraftment by near IR. Nano Lett. 18, 4069–4073 (2018).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 137.

    Lin, X. et al. A viscoelastic adhesive epicardial patch for treating myocardial infarction. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 3, 632–643 (2019).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 138.

    Walker, B. W. et al. Engineering a naturally-derived adhesive and conductive cardiopatch. Biomaterials 207, 89–101 (2019).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 139.

    Feiner, R. et al. Engineered hybrid cardiac patches with multifunctional electronics for online monitoring and regulation of tissue function. Nat. Mater. 15, 679–685 (2016).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 140.

    Feiner, R. et al. A stretchable and flexible cardiac tissue–electronics hybrid enabling multiple drug release, sensing, and stimulation. Small 15, 1805526 (2019).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • 141.

    Xu, L. et al. 3D multifunctional integumentary membranes for spatiotemporal cardiac measurements and stimulation across the entire epicardium. Nat. Commun. 5, 3329 (2014).

    PubMed 
    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 142.

    Zheng, G., Patolsky, F., Cui, Y., Wang, W. U. & Lieber, C. M. Multiplexed electrical detection of cancer markers with nanowire sensor arrays. Nat. Biotechnol. 23, 1294–1301 (2005).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 143.

    Andorko, J. I. & Jewell, C. M. Designing biomaterials with immunomodulatory properties for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. Bioeng. Transl. Med. 2, 139–155 (2017).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 144.

    Edri, R. et al. Personalized hydrogels for engineering diverse fully autologous tissue implants. Adv. Mater. 31, e1803895 (2019).

    PubMed 
    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 145.

    Shevach, M. et al. Omentum ECM-based hydrogel as a platform for cardiac cell delivery. Biomed. Mater. 10, 034106 (2015).

    PubMed 
    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 146.

    Chan, V., Raman, R., Cvetkovic, C. & Bashir, R. Enabling microscale and nanoscale approaches for bioengineered cardiac tissue. ACS Nano 7, 1830–1837 (2013).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 147.

    Chang, W. G. & Niklason, L. E. A short discourse on vascular tissue engineering. NPJ Regen. Med. 2, 7 (2017).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 148.

    Masumoto, H. et al. Human iPS cell-engineered cardiac tissue sheets with cardiomyocytes and vascular cells for cardiac regeneration. Sci. Rep. 4, 6716 (2014).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 149.

    Masumoto, H. et al. Pluripotent stem cell-engineered cell sheets reassembled with defined cardiovascular populations ameliorate reduction in infarct heart function through cardiomyocyte-mediated neovascularization. Stem Cell 30, 1196–1205 (2012).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 150.

    Shimizu, T. et al. Polysurgery of cell sheet grafts overcomes diffusion limits to produce thick, vascularized myocardial tissues. FASEB J. 20, 708–710 (2006).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 151.

    Rakusan, K., Flanagan, M. F., Geva, T., Southern, J. & Van Praagh, R. Morphometry of human coronary capillaries during normal growth and the effect of age in left ventricular pressure-overload hypertrophy. Circulation 86, 38–46 (1992).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 152.

    Rouwkema, J., Rivron, N. C. & van Blitterswijk, C. A. Vascularization in tissue engineering. Trends Biotechnol. 26, 434–441 (2008).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 153.

    Dvir, T. et al. Prevascularization of cardiac patch on the omentum improves its therapeutic outcome. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 14990–14995 (2009).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 154.

    Anderson, E. M. et al. VEGF and IGF delivered from alginate hydrogels promote stable perfusion recovery in ischemic hind limbs of aged mice and young rabbits. J. Vasc. Res. 54, 288–298 (2017).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 155.

    Miyagi, Y. et al. Biodegradable collagen patch with covalently immobilized VEGF for myocardial repair. Biomaterials 32, 1280–1290 (2011).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 156.

    Sekine, H. et al. Endothelial cell coculture within tissue-engineered cardiomyocyte sheets enhances neovascularization and improves cardiac function of ischemic hearts. Circulation 118 (Suppl. 14), S145–S152 (2008).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 157.

    Davies, N. H., Schmidt, C., Bezuidenhout, D. & Zilla, P. Sustaining neovascularization of a scaffold through staged release of vascular endothelial growth factor-A and platelet-derived growth factor-BB. Tissue Eng. Part A 18, 26–34 (2012).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 158.

    Lesman, A., Gepstein, L. & Levenberg, S. in Cardiac Tissue Engineering Ch. 12 (eds Radisic, M. & Black, L. D.) 131–137 (Springer, 2014).

  • 159.

    Levenberg, S. et al. Engineering vascularized skeletal muscle tissue. Nat. Biotechnol. 23, 879–884 (2005).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 160.

    Caspi, O. et al. Tissue engineering of vascularized cardiac muscle from human embryonic stem cells. Circ. Res. 100, 263–272 (2007).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 161.

    Lesman, A. et al. Transplantation of a tissue-engineered human vascularized cardiac muscle. Tissue Eng. Part A 16, 115–125 (2010).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 162.

    Gao, L. et al. Large cardiac muscle patches engineered from human induced-pluripotent stem cell–derived cardiac cells improve recovery from myocardial infarction in swine. Circulation 137, 1712–1730 (2018).

    PubMed 
    Article 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 163.

    Streeter, D. D. Jr., Spotnitz, H. M., Patel, D. P., Ross, J. Jr. & Sonnenblick, E. H. Fiber orientation in the canine left ventricle during diastole and systole. Circ. Res. 24, 339–347 (1969).

    PubMed 
    Article 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 164.

    Rohmer, D., Sitek, A. & Gullberg, G. T. Reconstruction and visualization of fiber and laminar structure in the normal human heart from ex vivo diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging (DTMRI) data. Invest. Radiol. 42, 777–789 (2007).

    PubMed 
    Article 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 165.

    Lee, J. M., Sing, S. L., Tan, E. Y. S. & Yeong, W. Y. Bioprinting in cardiovascular tissue engineering: a review. Int. J. Bioprinting 2, 27–36 (2016).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 166.

    Cui, H. et al. 4D physiologically adaptable cardiac patch: a 4-month in vivo study for the treatment of myocardial infarction. Sci. Adv. 6, eabb5067 (2020).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 167.

    Jain, R. K. Molecular regulation of vessel maturation. Nat. Med. 9, 685–693 (2003).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 168.

    Kolesky, D. B., Homan, K. A., Skylar-Scott, M. A. & Lewis, J. A. Three-dimensional bioprinting of thick vascularized tissues. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 3179–3184 (2016).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 169.

    Noor, N. et al. 3D printing of personalized thick and perfusable cardiac patches and hearts. Adv. Sci. 6, 1900344 (2019).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • 170.

    Zhu, W. et al. Direct 3D bioprinting of prevascularized tissue constructs with complex microarchitecture. Biomaterials 124, 106–115 (2017).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 171.

    Chaturvedi, R. R. et al. Patterning vascular networks in vivo for tissue engineering applications. Tissue Eng. C. Methods 21, 509–517 (2015).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 172.

    Raghavan, S., Nelson, C. M., Baranski, J. D., Lim, E. & Chen, C. S. Geometrically controlled endothelial tubulogenesis in micropatterned gels. Tissue Eng. Part A 16, 2255–2263 (2010).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 173.

    Arvatz, S., Wertheim, L., Fleischer, S., Shapira, A. & Dvir, T. Channeled ECM-based nanofibrous hydrogel for engineering vascularized cardiac tissues. Nanomaterials 9, 689 (2019).

    CAS 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 174.

    Miri, A. K. et al. Microfluidics-enabled multimaterial maskless stereolithographic bioprinting. Adv. Mater. 30, e1800242 (2018).

    PubMed 
    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 175.

    Chen, L., Kenkel, S. M., Hsieh, P. H., Gryka, M. C. & Bhargava, R. Freeform three-dimensionally printed microchannels via surface-initiated photopolymerization combined with sacrificial molding. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 12, 50105–50112 (2020).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 176.

    Grigoryan, B. et al. Multivascular networks and functional intravascular topologies within biocompatible hydrogels. Science 364, 458–464 (2019).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 177.

    Skylar-Scott, M. A. et al. Biomanufacturing of organ-specific tissues with high cellular density and embedded vascular channels. Sci. Adv. 5, eaaw2459 (2019).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 178.

    Miller, J. S. et al. Rapid casting of patterned vascular networks for perfusable engineered three-dimensional tissues. Nat. Mater. 11, 768–774 (2012).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 179.

    Ye, X. et al. A biodegradable microvessel scaffold as a framework to enable vascular support of engineered tissues. Biomaterials 34, 10007–10015 (2013).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 180.

    Bettinger, C. J. et al. Silk fibroin microfluidic devices. Adv. Mater. 19, 2847–2850 (2007).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 181.

    Zhang, B. et al. Biodegradable scaffold with built-in vasculature for organ-on-a-chip engineering and direct surgical anastomosis. Nat. Mater. 15, 669–678 (2016).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 182.

    Asulin, M., Michael, I., Shapira, A. & Dvir, T. One-step 3D printing of heart patches with built-in electronics for performance regulation. Adv. Sci. 8, 2004205 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 183.

    Zimmermann, W.-H. et al. Engineered heart tissue grafts improve systolic and diastolic function in infarcted rat hearts. Nat. Med. 12, 452–458 (2006).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 184.

    Didié, M. et al. Parthenogenetic stem cells for tissue-engineered heart repair. J. Clin. Invest. 123, 1285–1298 (2013).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • 185.

    Li, R.-K. et al. Survival and function of bioengineered cardiac grafts. Circulation 100 (Suppl. 19), II63–II69 (1999).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 186.

    Shudo, Y. et al. Novel regenerative therapy using cell-sheet covered with omentum flap delivers a huge number of cells in a porcine myocardial infarction model. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 142, 1188–1196 (2011).

    PubMed 
    Article 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 187.

    Fujita, B. & Zimmermann, W.-H. Myocardial tissue engineering strategies for heart repair: current state of the art. Interact. Cardiovasc. Thorac. Surg. 27, 916–920 (2018).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 188.

    Nguyen, P. K., Neofytou, E., Rhee, J.-W. & Wu, J. C. Potential strategies to address the major clinical barriers facing stem cell regenerative therapy for cardiovascular disease: a review. JAMA Cardiol. 1, 953–962 (2016).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 189.

    Stapleton, L., Zhu, Y., Woo, Y.-P. J. & Appel, E. Engineered biomaterials for heart disease. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 66, 246–254 (2020).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 190.

    Moroni, L. & Elisseeff, J. H. Biomaterials engineered for integration. Mater. Today 11, 44–51 (2008).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 191.

    Orlando, G., Soker, S. & Stratta, R. J. Organ bioengineering and regeneration as the new Holy Grail for organ transplantation. Ann. Surg. 258, 221–232 (2013).

    PubMed 
    Article 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 192.

    Ott, H. C. et al. Perfusion-decellularized matrix: using nature’s platform to engineer a bioartificial heart. Nat. Med. 14, 213–221 (2008).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 193.

    Lu, T.-Y. et al. Repopulation of decellularized mouse heart with human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiovascular progenitor cells. Nat. Commun. 4, 2307 (2013).

    PubMed 
    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 194.

    Guyette, J. P. et al. Bioengineering human myocardium on native extracellular matrix. Circ. Res. 118, 56–72 (2016).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 195.

    MacQueen, L. A. et al. A tissue-engineered scale model of the heart ventricle. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 2, 930–941 (2018).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 196.

    Corbett, D. C., Olszewski, E. & Stevens, K. A FRESH take on resolution in 3D bioprinting. Trends Biotechnol. 37, 1153–1155 (2019).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 197.

    Lee, A. et al. 3D bioprinting of collagen to rebuild components of the human heart. Science 365, 482–487 (2019).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 198.

    Hinton, T. J. et al. Three-dimensional printing of complex biological structures by freeform reversible embedding of suspended hydrogels. Sci. Adv. 1, e1500758 (2015).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • 199.

    Mirdamadi, E., Tashman, J. W., Shiwarski, D. J., Palchesko, R. N. & Feinberg, A. W. FRESH 3D bioprinting a full-size model of the human heart. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 6, 6453–6459 (2020).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 200.

    Shapira, A., Noor, N., Asulin, M. & Dvir, T. Stabilization strategies in extrusion-based 3D bioprinting for tissue engineering. Appl. Phys. Rev. 5, 041112 (2018).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • 201.

    Shapira, A., Noor, N., Oved, H. & Dvir, T. Transparent support media for high resolution 3D printing of volumetric cell-containing ECM structures. Biomed. Mater. 15, 045018 (2020).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 202.

    Kupfer, M. E. et al. In situ expansion, differentiation and electromechanical coupling of human cardiac muscle in a 3D bioprinted, chambered organoid. Circ. Res. 127, 207–224 (2020).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 203.

    Romagnuolo, R. et al. Human embryonic stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes regenerate the infarcted pig heart but induce ventricular tachyarrhythmias. Stem Cell Rep. 12, 967–981 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 204.

    Liu, Y.-W. et al. Human embryonic stem cell–derived cardiomyocytes restore function in infarcted hearts of non-human primates. Nat. Biotechnol. 36, 597–605 (2018).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 205.

    Menasché, P. et al. Transplantation of human embryonic stem cell-derived cardiovascular progenitors for severe ischemic left ventricular dysfunction. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 71, 429–438 (2018).

    PubMed 
    Article 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 206.

    Cyranoski, D. ‘Reprogrammed’ stem cells approved to mend human hearts for the first time. Nature 557, 619–620 (2018).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 207.

    Shapira, A. & Dvir, T. 3D tissue and organ printing — hope and reality. Adv. Sci. 8, 2003751 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 208.

    Yadid, M., Sela, G., Pavlov, D. A. & Landesberg, A. Adaptive control of cardiac contraction to changes in loading: from theory of sarcomere dynamics to whole-heart function. Pflügers Arch. 462, 49–60 (2011).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 209.

    Leor, J. et al. Bioengineered cardiac grafts: a new approach to repair the infarcted myocardium? Circulation 102, III56–III61 (2000).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 210.

    Leor, J. et al. Intracoronary injection of in situ forming alginate hydrogel reverses left ventricular remodeling after myocardial infarction in Swine. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 54, 1014–1023 (2009).

    PubMed 
    Article 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 211.

    Zhang, S. et al. A self-assembly pathway to aligned monodomain gels. Nat. Mater. 9, 594–601 (2010).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 212.

    Montgomery, M. et al. Flexible shape-memory scaffold for minimally invasive delivery of functional tissues. Nat. Mater. 16, 1038–1046 (2017).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 213.

    Sapir, Y., Polyak, B. & Cohen, S. Cardiac tissue engineering in magnetically actuated scaffolds. Nanotechnology 25, 014009 (2013).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • 214.

    Shevach, M., Fleischer, S., Shapira, A. & Dvir, T. Gold nanoparticle-decellularized matrix hybrids for cardiac tissue engineering. Nano Lett. 14, 5792–5796 (2014).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 215.

    Eschenhagen, T. et al. Three-dimensional reconstitution of embryonic cardiomyocytes in a collagen matrix: a new heart muscle model system. FASEB J. 11, 683–694 (1997).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 216.

    Bayer, J. D., Blake, R. C., Plank, G. & Trayanova, N. A. A novel rule-based algorithm for assigning myocardial fiber orientation to computational heart models. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 40, 2243–2254 (2012).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 217.

    Wilson, A. J. et al. Myocardial Laminar Organization Is Retained in Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitor Treated SHRs. Exp. Mech. 61, 31–40 (2021).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 218.

    Fleischer, S. et al. Spring-like fibers for cardiac tissue engineering. Biomaterials 34, 8599–8606 (2013).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 219.

    Macchiarelli, G. et al. A micro-anatomical model of the distribution of myocardial endomysial collagen. Histol. Histopathol. 17, 699–706 (2002).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 220.

    Hasegawa, T., Visovatti, S. H., Hyman, M. C., Hayasaki, T. & Pinsky, D. J. Heterotopic vascularized murine cardiac transplantation to study graft arteriopathy. Nat. Protoc. 2, 471–480 (2007).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 221.

    Gloschat, C. et al. RHYTHM: an open source imaging toolkit for cardiac panoramic optical mapping. Sci. Rep. 8, 2921 (2018).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Source link