Abramson, J. S. et al. Transcend NHL 001: immunotherapy with the CD19-directed CAR T-cell product JCAR017 results in high complete response rates in relapsed or refractory B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Blood 128, 4192–4192 (2016).
Shifrut, E. et al. Genome-wide CRISPR screens in primary human T cells reveal key regulators of immune function. Cell 175, 1958–1971 (2018).
Google Scholar
Dong, M. B. et al. Systematic immunotherapy target discovery using genome-scale in vivo CRISPR screens in CD8 T cells. Cell 178, 1189–1204 (2019).
Google Scholar
Chen, Z. et al. In vivo CD8+ T cell CRISPR screening reveals control by Fli1 in infection and cancer. Cell 184, 1262–1280 (2021).
Google Scholar
Kabelitz, D., Serrano, R., Kouakanou, L., Peters, C. & Kalyan, S. Cancer immunotherapy with γδ T cells: many paths ahead of us. Cell. Mol. Immunol. 17, 925–939 (2020).
Google Scholar
Munshi, N. C. et al. Idecabtagene vicleucel in relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma. N. Engl. J. Med. 384, 705–716 (2021).
Google Scholar
Fraietta, J. A. et al. Determinants of response and resistance to CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy of chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Nat. Med. 24, 563–571 (2018).
Google Scholar
Singer, M. et al. A distinct gene module for dysfunction uncoupled from activation in tumor-infiltrating T cells. Cell 166, 1500–1511 (2016).
Google Scholar
Gurusamy, D. et al. Multi-phenotype CRISPR–Cas9 screen identifies p38 kinase as a target for adoptive immunotherapies. Cancer Cell 37, 818–833 (2020).
Google Scholar
Legut, M., Dolton, G., Mian, A. A., Ottmann, O. G. & Sewell, A. K. CRISPR-mediated TCR replacement generates superior anticancer transgenic T cells. Blood 131, 311–322 (2018).
Google Scholar
Ren, J. et al. Multiplex genome editing to generate universal CAR T cells resistant to PD1 inhibition. Clin. Cancer Res. 23, 2255–2266 (2017).
Google Scholar
Wagner, D. L. et al. High prevalence of Streptococcus pyogenes Cas9-reactive T cells within the adult human population. Nat. Med. 25, 242–248 (2019).
Google Scholar
Wu, X. et al. Genome-wide binding of the CRISPR endonuclease Cas9 in mammalian cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 32, 670–676 (2014).
Google Scholar
Sack, L. M. et al. Profound tissue specificity in proliferation control underlies cancer drivers and aneuploidy patterns. Cell 173, 499–514 (2018).
Google Scholar
Yuan, J. et al. CTLA-4 blockade enhances polyfunctional NY-ESO-1 specific T cell responses in metastatic melanoma patients with clinical benefit. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 20410–20415 (2008).
Google Scholar
Sommermeyer, D. et al. Chimeric antigen receptor-modified T cells derived from defined CD8+ and CD4+ subsets confer superior antitumor reactivity in vivo. Leukemia 30, 492–500 (2016).
Google Scholar
Fischer, A. M., Katayama, C. D., Pagès, G., Pouysségur, J. & Hedrick, S. M. The role of Erk1 and Erk2 in multiple stages of T cell development. Immunity 23, 431–443 (2005).
Google Scholar
Lipp, A. M. et al. Lck mediates signal transmission from CD59 to the TCR/CD3 pathway in Jurkat T cells. PLoS One 9, e85934 (2014).
Google Scholar
Ma, X. et al. Interleukin-23 engineering improves CAR T cell function in solid tumors. Nat. Biotechnol. 38, 448–459 (2020).
Google Scholar
Seo, H. et al. BATF and IRF4 cooperate to counter exhaustion in tumor-infiltrating CAR T cells. Nat. Immunol. 22, 983–995 (2021).
Google Scholar
Jamali, A. et al. Highly efficient and selective CAR-gene transfer using CD4- and CD8-targeted lentiviral vectors. Mol. Ther. Methods Clin. Dev. 13, 371–379 (2019).
Google Scholar
Stoeckius, M. et al. Simultaneous epitope and transcriptome measurement in single cells. Nat. Methods 14, 865–868 (2017).
Google Scholar
Mimitou, E. P. et al. Multiplexed detection of proteins, transcriptomes, clonotypes and CRISPR perturbations in single cells. Nat. Methods 16, 409–412 (2019).
Google Scholar
Gil-Yarom, N. et al. CD74 is a novel transcription regulator. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 562–567 (2017).
Google Scholar
Ataide, M. A. et al. BATF3 programs CD8+ T cell memory. Nat. Immunol. 21, 1397–1407 (2020).
Google Scholar
Katagiri, T., Kameda, H., Nakano, H. & Yamazaki, S. Regulation of T cell differentiation by the AP-1 transcription factor JunB. Immunol. Med. 44, 197–203 (2021).
Zhao, X., Shan, Q. & Xue, H.-H. TCF1 in T cell immunity: a broadened frontier. Nat. Rev. Immunol. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41577-021-00563-6 (2021).
Sudhamsu, J. et al. Dimerization of LTβR by LTα1β2 is necessary and sufficient for signal transduction. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci USA 110, 19896–19901 (2013).
Google Scholar
Li, C. et al. Structurally distinct recognition motifs in lymphotoxin-β receptor and CD40 for tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated factor (TRAF)-mediated signaling. J. Biol. Chem. 278, 50523–50529 (2003).
Google Scholar
Wu, M.-Y., Wang, P.-Y., Han, S.-H. & Hsieh, S.-L. The cytoplasmic domain of the lymphotoxin-β receptor mediates cell death in HeLa cells. J. Biol. Chem. 274, 11868–11873 (1999).
Google Scholar
Macian, F. NFAT proteins: key regulators of T-cell development and function. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 5, 472–484 (2005).
Google Scholar
Dejardin, E. et al. The lymphotoxin-β receptor induces different patterns of gene expression via two NF-κB pathways. Immunity 17, 525–535 (2002).
Google Scholar
Saoulli, K. et al. CD28-independent, TRAF2-dependent costimulation of resting T cells by 4-1BB ligand. J. Exp. Med. 187, 1849–1862 (1998).
Google Scholar
Thommen, D. S. & Schumacher, T. N. T cell dysfunction in cancer. Cancer Cell 33, 547–562 (2018).
Google Scholar
Roth, T. L. et al. Pooled knockin targeting for genome engineering of cellular immunotherapies. Cell 181, 728–744 (2020).
Google Scholar
VanArsdale, T. L. et al. Lymphotoxin- receptor signaling complex: role of tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated factor 3 recruitment in cell death and activation of nuclear factor B. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 94, 2460–2465 (1997).
Google Scholar
Yılmaz, Z. B. et al. Quantitative dissection and modeling of the NF-κB p100-p105 module reveals interdependent precursor proteolysis. Cell Rep. 9, 1756–1769 (2014).
Google Scholar
Hu, B. et al. Augmentation of antitumor immunity by human and mouse CAR T cells secreting IL-18. Cell Rep. 20, 3025–3033 (2017).
Google Scholar
Yeku, O. O., Purdon, T. J., Koneru, M., Spriggs, D. & Brentjens, R. J. Armored CAR T cells enhance antitumor efficacy and overcome the tumor microenvironment. Sci. Rep. 7, 10541 (2017).
Google Scholar
Lynn, R. C. et al. c-Jun overexpression in CAR T cells induces exhaustion resistance. Nature 576, 293–300 (2019).
Google Scholar
Schmiedel, B. J. et al. Impact of genetic polymorphisms on human immune cell gene expression. Cell 175, 1701–1715 (2018).
Google Scholar
Lissina, A. et al. Protein kinase inhibitors substantially improve the physical detection of T-cells with peptide-MHC tetramers. J. Immunol. Methods 340, 11–24 (2009).
Google Scholar
Meier, J. A., Zhang, F. & Sanjana, N. E. GUIDES: sgRNA design for loss-of-function screens. Nat. Methods 14, 831–832 (2017).
Google Scholar
Liscovitch-Brauer, N. et al. Profiling the genetic determinants of chromatin accessibility with scalable single-cell CRISPR screens. Nat. Biotechnol. 39, 1270–1277 (2021).
Google Scholar
Dobin, A. et al. STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner. Bioinformatics 29, 15–21 (2013).
Google Scholar
Legut, M. et al. High-throughput screens of PAM-flexible Cas9 variants for gene knockout and transcriptional modulation. Cell Rep. 30, 2859–2868 (2020).
Google Scholar
Langmead, B., Trapnell, C., Pop, M. & Salzberg, S. L. Ultrafast and memory-efficient alignment of short DNA sequences to the human genome. Genome Biol. 10, R25 (2009).
Google Scholar
Martin, M. Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads. EMBnet j. 17, 10 (2011).
Wang, B. et al. Integrative analysis of pooled CRISPR genetic screens using MAGeCKFlute. Nat. Protoc. 14, 756–780 (2019).
Google Scholar
Love, M. I., Huber, W. & Anders, S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 15, 550 (2014).
Google Scholar
Alexa, A. & Rahnenfuhrer, J. topGO: Enrichment Analysis for Gene Ontology R package v.2.46.0 (Bioconductor, 2021).
Rambaldi, D., Pece, S. & Di Fiore, P. P. flowFit: a Bioconductor package to estimate proliferation in cell-tracking dye studies. Bioinformatics 30, 2060–2065 (2014).
Google Scholar
Wessels, H.-H. et al. Massively parallel Cas13 screens reveal principles for guide RNA design. Nat. Biotechnol. 38, 722–727 (2020).
Google Scholar
Guedan, S., Calderon, H., Posey, A. D. & Maus, M. V. Engineering and design of chimeric antigen receptors. Mol. Ther. Methods Clin. Dev. 12, 145–156 (2019).
Google Scholar
Melsted, P. et al. Modular, efficient and constant-memory single-cell RNA-seq preprocessing. Nat. Biotechnol. 39, 813–818 (2021).
Google Scholar
Melsted, P., Ntranos, V. & Pachter, L. The barcode, UMI, set format and BUStools. Bioinformatics 35, 4472–4473 (2019).
Google Scholar
Langmead, B. & Salzberg, S. L. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat. Methods 9, 357–359 (2012).
Google Scholar
Stoeckius, M. et al. Cell Hashing with barcoded antibodies enables multiplexing and doublet detection for single cell genomics. Genome Biol. 19, 224 (2018).
Google Scholar
McGinnis, C. S. et al. MULTI-seq: sample multiplexing for single-cell RNA sequencing using lipid-tagged indices. Nat. Methods 16, 619–626 (2019).
Google Scholar
Hao, Y. et al. Integrated analysis of multimodal single-cell data. Cell 184, 3573–3587 (2021).
Google Scholar
Chung, N. C. & Storey, J. D. Statistical significance of variables driving systematic variation in high-dimensional data. Bioinformatics 31, 545–554 (2015).
Google Scholar
Becht, E. et al. Dimensionality reduction for visualizing single-cell data using UMAP. Nat. Biotechnol. 37, 88–44 (2018).
Storey, J. D. & Tibshirani, R. Statistical significance for genomewide studies. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 9440–9445 (2003).
Google Scholar
Pallares, L. F., Picard, S. & Ayroles, J. F. TM3’seq: a tagmentation-mediated 3′ sequencing approach for improving scalability of RNAseq experiments. G3 10, 143–150 (2020).
Google Scholar
Yates, A. D. et al. Ensembl 2020. Nucleic Acids Res. 48, D682–D688 (2019).
Google Scholar
Soneson, C., Love, M. I. & Robinson, M. D. Differential analyses for RNA-seq: transcript-level estimates improve gene-level inferences. F1000Res. 4, 1521 (2015).
Google Scholar
Schneider, V. A. et al. Evaluation of GRCh38 and de novo haploid genome assemblies demonstrates the enduring quality of the reference assembly. Genome Res. 27, 849–864 (2017).
Google Scholar
Li, H. et al. The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 25, 2078–2079 (2009).
Google Scholar
Broad Institute. Picard Toolkit https://broadinstitute.github.io/picard/ (Broad Institute, GitHub Repository, 2019).
Zhang, Y. et al. Model-based analysis of ChIP–seq (MACS). Genome Biol. 9, R137 (2008).
Google Scholar
Quinlan, A. R. & Hall, I. M. BEDTools: a flexible suite of utilities for comparing genomic features. Bioinformatics 26, 841–842 (2010).
Google Scholar
Schep, A. N., Wu, B., Buenrostro, J. D. & Greenleaf, W. J. chromVAR: inferring transcription-factor-associated accessibility from single-cell epigenomic data. Nat. Methods 14, 975–978 (2017).
Google Scholar
Ramírez, F., Dündar, F., Diehl, S., Grüning, B. A. & Manke, T. deepTools: a flexible platform for exploring deep-sequencing data. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, W187–W191 (2014).
Google Scholar
Lopez-Delisle, L. et al. pyGenomeTracks: reproducible plots for multivariate genomic datasets. Bioinformatics 37, 422–423 (2021).
Google Scholar
GTEx Consortium. The GTEx Consortium atlas of genetic regulatory effects across human tissues. Science 369, 1318–1330 (2020).
Ding, J. et al. Systematic comparative analysis of single cell and single-nucleus RNA-sequencing methods. Nat. Biotechnol. 38, 737–746 (2020).
Google Scholar
