Vos, T. et al. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 310 diseases and injuries, 1990–2015: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. Lancet 388, 1545–1602 (2016).
Google Scholar
Kaminski, N. General Information about Pulmonary Fibrosis. Available at: https://www.thoracic.org/patients/lung-disease-week/2015/pulmonary-fibrosis-week/general-info.php.
Virani, S. S. et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics—2020 update: A report from the American Heart Association. Circulation https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000757 (2020).
Google Scholar
Turner, N. A. & Porter, K. E. Function and fate of myofibroblasts after myocardial infarction. Fibrogenes. Tissue Repair 6, 1–10 (2013).
Google Scholar
Díez, J. Mechanisms of cardiac fibrosis in hypertension. J. Clin. Hypertens. (Greenwich) 9, 546–550 (2007).
Google Scholar
Biernacka, A. & Frangogiannis, N. G. Aging and cardiac fibrosis. Aging Dis. 2, 158–173 (2011).
Google Scholar
Horn, M. A. & Trafford, A. W. Aging and the cardiac collagen matrix: Novel mediators of fibrotic remodelling. J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol. 93, 175–185 (2016).
Google Scholar
Liu, T. et al. Current understanding of the pathophysiology of myocardial fibrosis and its quantitative assessment in heart failure. Front. Physiol. 8, 1–13 (2017).
Google Scholar
Segura, A. M., Frazier, O. H. & Buja, L. M. Fibrosis and heart failure. Heart Fail. Rev. 19, 173–185 (2014).
Google Scholar
Petrov, V. V., Fagard, R. H. & Lijnen, P. J. Stimulation of collagen production by transforming growth factor-β1 during differentiation of cardiac fibroblasts to myofibroblasts. Hypertension 39, 258–263 (2002).
Google Scholar
Majno, G., Gabbiani, G., Hirschel, B. J., Ryan, G. B. & Statkov, P. R. Contraction of granulation tissue in vitro: Similarity to smooth muscle. Science (80-. ). 173, 548–550 (1971).
Gabbianni, G., Hirschel, B. J., Ryan, G. B., Statkov, P. R. & Majno, G. Granulation tissue as a contractile organ. J. Exp. Med. 135, 719–734 (1972).
Google Scholar
Walraven, M. & Hinz, B. Therapeutic approaches to control tissue repair and fibrosis: Extracellular matrix as a game changer. Matrix Biol. 71–72, 205–224 (2018).
Google Scholar
Gabbiani, G., Ryan, G. & Majno, G. Presence of modified fibroblasts in granulation tissue and their possible role in wound contraction. Experientia 27, 549–550 (1971).
Google Scholar
Schmitt-Gräff, A., Desmoulière, A., Gabbiani, G., Schmitt-Gräff, A. & Desmoulière, A. Heterogeneity of myofibroblast phenotypic features: an example of fibroblastic cell plasticity. Virchows Arch. 425, 3–24 (1994).
Google Scholar
Hinz, B. Formation and function of the myofibroblast during tissue repair. J. Invest. Dermatol. 127, 526–537 (2007).
Google Scholar
Sun, K. H., Chang, Y., Reed, N. I. & Sheppard, D. α-smooth muscle actin is an inconsistent marker of fibroblasts responsible for force-dependent TGFβ activation or collagen production across multiple models of organ fibrosis. Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol. 310, L824–L836 (2016).
Xie, T. et al. Single-cell deconvolution of fibroblast heterogeneity in mouse pulmonary fibrosis. Cell Rep. 22, 3625–3640 (2018).
Google Scholar
Hinz, B., Mastrangelo, D., Iselin, C. E., Chaponnier, C. & Gabbiani, G. Mechanical tension controls granulation tissue contractile activity and myofibroblast differentiation. Am. J. Pathol. 159, 1009–1020 (2001).
Google Scholar
Tomasek, J. J., Gabbiani, G., Hinz, B., Chaponnier, C. & Brown, R. A. Myofibroblasts and mechano: Regulation of connective tissue remodelling. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 3, 349–363 (2002).
Google Scholar
Leask, A. TGFβ, cardiac fibroblasts, and the fibrotic response. Cardiovasc. Res. 74, 207–212 (2007).
Google Scholar
Desmouliere, A., Geinoz, A., Gabbiani, F. & Gabbiani, G. Transforming growth factor-β1 induces α-smooth muscle actin expression in granulation tissue myofibroblasts and in quiescent and growing cultured fibroblasts. J. Cell Biol. 122, 103–111 (1993).
Google Scholar
Wynn, T. A. & Ramalingam, T. R. Mechanisms of fibrosis: Therapeutic translation for fibrotic disease. Nat. Med. 18, 1028–1040 (2012).
Google Scholar
Serini, G. & Gabbiani, G. Mechanisms of myofibroblast activity and phenotypic modulation. Exp. Cell Res. 250, 273–283 (1999).
Google Scholar
Svystonyuk, D. A. et al. Fibroblast growth factor-2 regulates human cardiac myofibroblast-mediated extracellular matrix remodeling. J. Transl. Med. 13, 1–11 (2015).
Google Scholar
Ngu, J. M. C. et al. Human cardiac fibroblast extracellular matrix remodeling: Dual effects of tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-2. Cardiovasc. Pathol. 23, 335–343 (2014).
Google Scholar
Hinz, B., Dugina, V., Ballestrem, C., Wehrle-Haller, B. & Chaponnier, C. A-smooth muscle actin is crucial for focal adhesion maturation in myofibroblasts. Mol. Biol. Cell 14, 2508–2519 (2003).
Google Scholar
Hinz, B., Gabbiani, G. & Chaponnier, C. The NH2-terminal peptide of α-smooth muscle actin inhibits force generation by the myofibroblast in vitro and in vivo. J. Cell Biol. 157, 657–663 (2002).
Google Scholar
Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I. & Hinton, G. E. ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. Commun. ACM 60, 84–90 (2017).
Google Scholar
Lecun, Y., Bottou, L., Bengio, Y. & Haffner, P. Gradient-Based learning applied to document recognition. Proc. IEEE (1998).
Meng, N., Lam, E. Y., Tsia, K. K. & So, H. K. H. Large-scale multi-class image-based cell classification with deep learning. IEEE J. Biomed. Heal. Inform. 23, 2091–2098 (2019).
Google Scholar
Meng, N., So, H. K. H. & Lam, E. Y. Computational single-cell classification using deep learning on bright-field and phase images. Proc. 15th IAPR Int. Conf. Mach. Vis. Appl. MVA 2017 190–193 (2017). https://doi.org/10.23919/MVA.2017.7986833
Shahin, A. I., Guo, Y., Amin, K. M. & Sharawi, A. A. White blood cells identification system based on convolutional deep neural learning networks. Comput. Methods Programs Biomed. 168, 69–80 (2019).
Google Scholar
Rahman, S., Wang, L., Sun, C. & Zhou, L. Deep learning based HEp-2 image classification: A comprehensive review. Med. Image Anal. 65, 101764 (2020).
Godinez, W. J., Hossain, I., Lazic, S. E., Davies, J. W. & Zhang, X. A multi-scale convolutional neural network for phenotyping high-content cellular images. Bioinformatics 33, 2010–2019 (2017).
Google Scholar
Boland, M. V. & Murphy, R. F. A neural network classifier capable of recognizing the patterns of all major subcellular structures in fluorescence microscope images of HeLa cells. Bioinformatics 17, 1213–1223 (2001).
Google Scholar
Boland, M. V., Markey, M. K. & Murphy, R. F. Automated recognition of patterns characteristic of subcellular structures in fluorescence microscopy images. Cytometry 33, 366–375 (1998).
Google Scholar
Lateef, F. & Ruichek, Y. Survey on semantic segmentation using deep learning techniques. Neurocomputing 338, 321–348 (2019).
Google Scholar
Ronneberger, O., Fischer, P. & Brox, T. U-net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation. Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. (including Subser. Lect. Notes Artif. Intell. Lect. Notes Bioinformatics) 9351, 234–241 (2015).
Zhang, Z., Liu, Q. & Wang, Y. Road extraction by deep residual U-Net. IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Lett. 15, 749–753 (2018).
Google Scholar
Paszke, A., Chaurasia, A., Kim, S. & Culurciello, E. ENet: A deep neural network architecture for real-time semantic segmentation. arXiv:1606.02147 (2016).
Pohlen, T., Hermans, A., Mathias, M. & Leibe, B. Full-resolution residual networks for semantic segmentation in street scenes. Proc. 30th IEEE Conf. Comput. Vis. Pattern Recognition, CVPR 2017, 3309–3318 (2017).
Romera, E., Alvarez, J. M., Bergasa, L. M. & Arroyo, R. ERFNet: Efficient residual factorized ConvNet for real-time semantic segmentation. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 19, 263–272 (2018).
Google Scholar
Greenwald, N. F. et al. Whole cell segmentation of tissue images with human-level performance using large-scale data annotation and deep learning. bioRxive 1–29 (2021).
Prangemeier, T., Reich, C. & Koeppl, H. Attention-based transformers for instance segmentation of cells in microstructures. IEEEE BIBM 700–707 (2020).
Yang, L. & Liphardt, J. NuSeT: A deep learning tool for reliably separating and analyzing crowded cells. PLOS Comput. Biol. 16, e1008193 (2020).
Fahrettin, C., Nur, G. & Cetin-atalay, R. DeepDistance: A multi-task deep regression model for cell detection in inverted microscopy images. Med. Image Anal. 63, 101720 (2020).
Piotrowski, T. et al. Deep-learning-based multi-class segmentation for automated, non-invasive routine assessment of human pluripotent stem cell culture status. Comput. Biol. Med. 129, 104172 (2021).
Zeisberg, M. & Kalluri, R. Cellular mechanisms of tissue fibrosis. 1. Common and organ-specific mechanisms associated with tissue fibrosis. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 304, 216–225 (2013).
Chung, C., Beecham, M., Mauck, R. L. & Burdick, J. A. The influence of degradation characteristics of hyaluronic acid hydrogels on in vitro neocartilage formation by mesenchymal stem cells. Biomaterials 30, 4287–4296 (2009).
Google Scholar
Achterberg, V. F. et al. The nano-scale mechanical properties of the extracellular matrix regulate dermal fibroblast function. J. Invest. Dermatol. 134, 1862–1872 (2014).
Google Scholar
Kloxin, A. M., Benton, J. A. & Anseth, K. In situ elasticity modulation with dynamic substrates to direct cell phenotype. Biomaterials 31, 1–8 (2010).
Google Scholar
Quinlan, A. M. T. & Billiar, K. L. Investigating the role of substrate stiffness in the persistence of valvular interstitial cell activation. J. Biomed. Mater. 87257, 2474–2482 (2012).
Chaponnier, C. & Gabbiani, G. Monoclonal antibodies against muscle actin isoforms: Epitope identification and analysis of isoform expression by immunoblot and immunostaining in normal and regenerating skeletal muscle. F1000Research (2016).
Abadi, M. et al. TensorFlow: Large-scale machine learning on heterogeneous distributed systems. arXiv:1603.04467 (2016).
Hinz, B. Tissue stiffness, latent TGF-β1 Activation, and mechanical signal transduction: Implications for the pathogenesis and treatment of fibrosis. Curr. Rheumatol. Rep. 11, 120–126 (2009).
Google Scholar
Coenen, T. et al. Reversible and irreversible differentiation of cardiac fibroblasts. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. (2014). https://doi.org/10.1093/cvr/cvt338
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S. & Sun, J. Deep residual learning for image recognition. Proc. IEEE Comput. Soc. Conf. Comput. Vis. Pattern Recognit. 770–778 (2016).
Falk, T. et al. U-Net: Deep learning for cell counting, detection, and morphometry. Nat. Methods 16, 67–70 (2019).
Google Scholar
Rogers, E., Zack, G. W. & Latt, S. A. Automatic measurement of sister chromatid exchange frequency. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 25, 741–753 (1977).
Google Scholar
Barron, J. T. A generalization of Otsu’s method and minimum error thresholding. Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. (including Subser. Lect. Notes Artif. Intell. Lect. Notes Bioinformatics) 455–470 (2020).
Vaswani, A. et al. Attention is all you need. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 5999–6009 (2017).
Hu, J. Squeeze-and-Excitation Networks. arXiv:1709.01507 (2018).
Kaiming He, Xiangyu Zhang, Shaoqing Ren, J. S. Spatial pyramid pooling in deep convolutional networks for visual recognition. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 37, 1904 (2015).
Zhu, Z. & Yang, C. J. Hydrogel droplet microfluidics for high-throughput single molecule/cell analysis. Acc. Chem. Res. 50, 22–31 (2017).
Google Scholar
