Humphrey, S. J., James, D. E. & Mann, M. Protein phosphorylation: a major switch mechanism for metabolic regulation. Trends Endocrinol. Metab. 26, 676–687 (2015).
Google Scholar
Humphrey, S. J. et al. Dynamic adipocyte phosphoproteome reveals that Akt directly regulates mTORC2. Cell Metab. 17, 1009–1020 (2013).
Google Scholar
Lundby, A. et al. Oncogenic mutations rewire signaling pathways by switching protein recruitment to phosphotyrosine sites. Cell 179, 543–560 (2019).
Google Scholar
Robles, M. S., Humphrey, S. J. & Mann, M. Phosphorylation is a central mechanism for circadian control of metabolism and physiology. Cell Metab. 25, 118–127 (2017).
Google Scholar
Bodenmiller, B. et al. Phosphoproteomic analysis reveals interconnected system-wide responses to perturbations of kinases and phosphatases in yeast. Sci. Signal. 3, rs4 (2010).
Google Scholar
Needham, E. J., Parker, B. L., Burykin, T., James, D. E. & Humphrey, S. J. Illuminating the dark phosphoproteome. Sci. Signal. 12, eaau8645 (2019).
Google Scholar
Oliveira, A. P. et al. Regulation of yeast central metabolism by enzyme phosphorylation. Mol. Syst. Biol. 8, 623 (2012).
Google Scholar
Gonçalves, E. et al. Systematic analysis of transcriptional and post-transcriptional regulation of metabolism in yeast. PLoS Comput. Biol. 13, e1005297 (2017).
Google Scholar
Ochoa, D. et al. The functional landscape of the human phosphoproteome. Nat. Biotechnol. 38, 365–373 (2020).
Google Scholar
Hoffman, N. J. et al. Global phosphoproteomic analysis of human skeletal muscle reveals a network of exercise-regulated kinases and AMPK substrates. Cell Metab. 22, 922–935 (2015).
Google Scholar
Hingst, J. R. et al. Exercise-induced molecular mechanisms promoting glycogen supercompensation in human skeletal muscle. Mol. Metab. 16, 24–34 (2018).
Google Scholar
Humphrey, S. J., Azimifar, S. B. & Mann, M. High-throughput phosphoproteomics reveals in vivo insulin signaling dynamics. Nat. Biotechnol. 33, 990–995 (2015).
Google Scholar
Humphrey, S. J., Karayel, O., James, D. E. & Mann, M. High-throughput and high-sensitivity phosphoproteomics with the EasyPhos platform. Nat. Protoc. 13, 1897–1916 (2018).
Google Scholar
Liu, J. J. et al. In vivo brain GPCR signaling elucidated by phosphoproteomics. Science 360, eaao4927 (2018).
Google Scholar
Hojlund, K. et al. Human ATP synthase beta is phosphorylated at multiple sites and shows abnormal phosphorylation at specific sites in insulin-resistant muscle. Diabetologia 53, 541–551 (2010).
Google Scholar
Batista, T. M. et al. A cell-autonomous signature of dysregulated protein phosphorylation underlies muscle insulin resistance in type 2 diabetes. Cell Metab. 32, 844–859 (2020).
Google Scholar
Vaag, A., Henriksen, J. E. & Beck-Nielsen, H. Decreased insulin activation of glycogen synthase in skeletal muscles in young nonobese Caucasian first-degree relatives of patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. J. Clin. Invest. 89, 782–788 (1992).
Google Scholar
Um, S. H. et al. Absence of S6K1 protects against age- and diet-induced obesity while enhancing insulin sensitivity. Nature 431, 200–205 (2004).
Google Scholar
Carraro, F., Stuart, C. A., Hartl, W. H., Rosenblatt, J. & Wolfe, R. R. Effect of exercise and recovery on muscle protein synthesis in human subjects. Am. J. Physiol. 259, E470–E476 (1990).
Google Scholar
Krycer, J. R. et al. Dynamic metabolomics reveals that insulin primes the adipocyte for glucose metabolism. Cell Rep. 21, 3536–3547 (2017).
Google Scholar
Phan, J. & Reue, K. Lipin, a lipodystrophy and obesity gene. Cell Metab. 1, 73–83 (2005).
Google Scholar
Hardie, D. G., Ross, F. A. & Hawley, S. A. AMPK: a nutrient and energy sensor that maintains energy homeostasis. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 13, 251–262 (2012).
Google Scholar
Kjøbsted, R. et al. Enhanced muscle insulin sensitivity after contraction/exercise is mediated by AMPK. Diabetes 66, 598–612 (2017).
Google Scholar
Lopez-Mejia, I. C. et al. CDK4 phosphorylates AMPKalpha2 to inhibit its activity and repress fatty acid oxidation. Mol. Cell 68, 336–349.e6 (2017).
Google Scholar
Rodrik-Outmezguine, V. S. et al. Overcoming mTOR resistance mutations with a new-generation mTOR inhibitor. Nature 534, 272–276 (2016).
Google Scholar
Ling, N. X. Y. et al. mTORC1 directly inhibits AMPK to promote cell proliferation under nutrient stress. Nat. Metab. 2, 41–49 (2020).
Google Scholar
Inoki, K., Zhu, T. & Guan, K.-L. TSC2 mediates cellular energy response to control cell growth and survival. Cell 115, 577–590 (2003).
Google Scholar
Gwinn, D. M. et al. AMPK phosphorylation of raptor mediates a metabolic checkpoint. Mol. Cell 30, 214–226 (2008).
Google Scholar
Mertins, P. et al. Proteogenomics connects somatic mutations to signalling in breast cancer. Nature 534, 55–62 (2016).
Google Scholar
Gillette, M. A. et al. Proteogenomic characterization reveals therapeutic vulnerabilities in lung adenocarcinoma. Cell 182, 200–225 (2020).
Google Scholar
Wojtaszewski, J. F., Hansen, B. F., Kiens, B. & Richter, E. A. Insulin signaling in human skeletal muscle: time course and effect of exercise. Diabetes 46, 1775–1781 (1997).
Google Scholar
Ong, S.-E. et al. Stable isotope labeling by amino acids in cell culture, SILAC, as a simple and accurate approach to expression proteomics. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 1, 376–386 (2002).
Google Scholar
Cox, J. et al. Accurate proteome-wide label-free quantification by delayed normalization and maximal peptide ratio extraction, termed MaxLFQ. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 13, 2513–2526 (2014).
Google Scholar
Cox, J. & Mann, M. MaxQuant enables high peptide identification rates, individualized p.p.b.-range mass accuracies and proteome-wide protein quantification. Nat. Biotechnol. 26, 1367–1372 (2008).
Google Scholar
Tyanova, S. et al. The Perseus computational platform for comprehensive analysis of (prote)omics data. Nat. Methods 13, 731–740 (2016).
Google Scholar
Bekker-Jensen, D. B. et al. Rapid and site-specific deep phosphoproteome profiling by data-independent acquisition without the need for spectral libraries. Nat. Commun. 11, 787 (2020).
Google Scholar
Yang, P. et al. Multi-omic profiling reveals dynamics of the phased progression of pluripotency. Cell Syst. 8, 427–445 (2019).
Needham, E. J. et al. Phosphoproteomics of acute cell stressors targeting exercise signaling networks reveal drug interactions regulating protein secretion. Cell Rep. 29, 1524–1538 (2019).
Google Scholar
Ritchie, M. E. et al. limma powers differential expression analyses for RNA-sequencing and microarray studies. Nucleic Acids Res. 43, e47 (2015).
Google Scholar
Benjamini, Y. & Hochberg, Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J. R. Stat. Soc. Series B Stat. Methodol. 57, 289–300 (1995).
Conway, J. R., Lex, A. & Gehlenborg, N. UpSetR: an R package for the visualization of intersecting sets and their properties. Bioinformatics 33, 2938–2940 (2017).
Google Scholar
Storey, J., Bass, A., Dabney, A., Robinson, D. & Warnes, G. qvalue: Q-value estimation for false discovery rate control. https://www.bioconductor.org/packages/devel/bioc/manuals/qvalue/man/qvalue.pdf (2021).
Hornbeck, P. V. et al. PhosphoSitePlus, 2014: mutations, PTMs and recalibrations. Nucleic Acids Res. 43, D512–D520 (2015).
Google Scholar
Ochoa, D. et al. An atlas of human kinase regulation. Mol. Syst. Biol. 12, 888 (2016).
Google Scholar
Chen, J. et al. The trans-ancestral genomic architecture of glycemic traits. Nat. Genet. 53, 840–860 (2021).
Google Scholar
Dickinson, M. E. et al. High-throughput discovery of novel developmental phenotypes. Nature 537, 508–514 (2016).
Google Scholar
