Meng, F. & Ellis, T. The second decade of synthetic biology: 2010–2020. Nat. Commun. 11, 5174 (2020).
Google Scholar
Sedlmayer, F., Aubel, D. & Fussenegger, M. Synthetic gene circuits for the detection, elimination and prevention of disease. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 2, 399–415 (2018).
Google Scholar
Kolar, K., Knobloch, C., Stork, H., Žnidarič, M. & Weber, W. OptoBase: a web platform for molecular optogenetics. ACS Synth. Biol. 7, 1825–1828 (2018).
Google Scholar
Moon, T. S., Lou, C., Tamsir, A., Stanton, B. C. & Voigt, C. A. Genetic programs constructed from layered logic gates in single cells. Nature 491, 249–253 (2012).
Google Scholar
Gao, X. J., Chong, L. S., Kim, M. S. & Elowitz, M. B. Programmable protein circuits in living cells. Science 361, 1252–1258 (2018).
Google Scholar
Tang, W. & Liu, D. R. Rewritable multi-event analog recording in bacterial and mammalian cells. Science 360, eaap8992 (2018).
Aoki, S. K. et al. A universal biomolecular integral feedback controller for robust perfect adaptation. Nature 570, 533–537 (2019).
Google Scholar
Toda, S., Blauch, L. R., Tang, S. K. Y., Morsut, L. & Lim, W. A. Programming self-organizing multicellular structures with synthetic cell-cell signaling. Science 361, 156–162 (2018).
Smanski, M. J. et al. Synthetic biology to access and expand nature’s chemical diversity. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 14, 135–149 (2016).
Google Scholar
Noireaux, V. & Liu, A. P. The new age of cell-free biology. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 22, 51–77 (2020).
Google Scholar
Godino, E. et al. Cell-free biogenesis of bacterial division proto-rings that can constrict liposomes. Commun. Biol. 3, 539 (2020).
Google Scholar
Garenne, D., Libchaber, A. & Noireaux, V. Membrane molecular crowding enhances MreB polymerization to shape synthetic cells from spheres to rods. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 1902–1909 (2020).
Google Scholar
Saleh, O. A., Jeon, B. J. & Liedl, T. Enzymatic degradation of liquid droplets of DNA is modulated near the phase boundary. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2001654117 (2020).
Sokolova, E. et al. Enhanced transcription rates in membrane-free protocells formed by coacervation of cell lysate. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 11692–11697 (2013).
Google Scholar
Green, L. N. et al. Autonomous dynamic control of DNA nanostructure self-assembly. Nat. Chem. 11, 510–520 (2019).
Google Scholar
Efrat, Y., Tayar, A. M., Daube, S. S., Levy, M. & Bar-Ziv, R. H. Electric-field manipulation of a compartmentalized cell-free gene expression reaction. ACS Synth. Biol. 7, 1829–1833 (2018).
Google Scholar
Dupin, A. & Simmel, F. C. Signalling and differentiation in emulsion-based multi-compartmentalized in vitro gene circuits. Nat. Chem. 11, 32–39 (2019).
Santorelli, M., Lam, C. & Morsut, L. Synthetic development: building mammalian multicellular structures with artificial genetic programs. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 59, 130–140 (2019).
Google Scholar
Scheller, L., Strittmatter, T., Fuchs, D., Bojar, D. & Fussenegger, M. Generalized extracellular molecule sensor platform for programming cellular behavior article. Nat. Chem. Biol. 14, 723–729 (2018).
Google Scholar
Rivière, I. & Sadelain, M. Chimeric antigen receptors: a cell and gene therapy perspective. Mol. Ther. 25, 1117–1124 (2017).
Stapornwongkul, K. S., de Gennes, M., Cocconi, L., Salbreux, G. & Vincent, J. P. Patterning and growth control in vivo by an engineered GFP gradient. Science 370, 321–327 (2020).
Google Scholar
Huang, X. et al. DNA scaffolds enable efficient and tunable functionalization of biomaterials for immune cell modulation. Nat. Nanotecnol. 16, 214–223 (2021).
Nielsen, A. A. K. et al. Genetic circuit design automation. Science 352, aac7341 (2016).
Burger, B. et al. A mobile robotic chemist. Nature 583, 237–241 (2020).
Google Scholar
Sanka, R., Lippai, J., Samarasekera, D., Nemsick, S. & Densmore, D. 3DμF—interactive design environment for continuous flow microfluidic devices. Sci. Rep. 9, 9166 (2019).
Zhang, J. et al. Combining mechanistic and machine learning models for predictive engineering and optimization of tryptophan metabolism. Nat. Commun. 11, 4880 (2020).
Waltemath, D. et al. The first 10 years of the international coordination network for standards in systems and synthetic biology (COMBINE). J. Integr. Bioinform. 17, 20200005 (2020).
Huebsch, N. & Mooney, D. J. Inspiration and application in the evolution of biomaterials. Nature 462, 426–432 (2009).
Google Scholar
Dimarco, R. L. & Heilshorn, S. C. Multifunctional materials through modular protein engineering. Adv. Mater. 24, 3923–3940 (2012).
Google Scholar
Chaudhuri, O., Cooper-White, J., Janmey, P. A., Mooney, D. J. & Shenoy, V. B. Effects of extracellular matrix viscoelasticity on cellular behaviour. Nature 584, 535–546 (2020).
Google Scholar
Rodell, C. B. et al. Shear-thinning supramolecular hydrogels with secondary autonomous covalent crosslinking to modulate viscoelastic properties in vivo. Adv. Funct. Mater. 25, 636–644 (2015).
Google Scholar
Baker, B. M. et al. Cell-mediated fibre recruitment drives extracellular matrix mechanosensing in engineered fibrillar microenvironments. Nat. Mater. 14, 1262–1268 (2015).
Google Scholar
Griffin, D. R., Weaver, W. M., Scumpia, P. O., Di Carlo, D. & Segura, T. Accelerated wound healing by injectable microporous gel scaffolds assembled from annealed building blocks. Nat. Mater. 14, 737–744 (2015).
Google Scholar
Skylar-Scott, M. A., Mueller, J., Visser, C. W. & Lewis, J. A. Voxelated soft matter via multimaterial multinozzle 3D printing. Nature 575, 330–335 (2019).
Google Scholar
Guo, Z., Liu, H., Dai, W. & Lei, Y. Responsive principles and applications of smart materials in biosensing. Smart Mater. Med. 1, 54–65 (2020).
Hörner, M. et al. Phytochrome-based extracellular matrix with reversibly tunable mechanical properties. Adv. Mater. 31, e1806727 (2019).
de Almeida, P. et al. Cytoskeletal stiffening in synthetic hydrogels. Nat. Commun. 10, 609 (2019).
Rosales, A. M., Vega, S. L., DelRio, F. W., Burdick, J. A. & Anseth, K. S. Hydrogels with reversible mechanics to probe dynamic cell microenvironments. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 56, 12132–12136 (2017).
Google Scholar
Badeau, B. A. & Deforest, C. A. Programming stimuli-responsive behavior into biomaterials. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 21, 241–265 (2019).
Google Scholar
Chao, Y. & Shum, H. C. Emerging aqueous two-phase systems: from fundamentals of interfaces to biomedical applications. Chem. Soc. Rev. 49, 114–142 (2020).
Google Scholar
Schuster, B. S. et al. Identifying sequence perturbations to an intrinsically disordered protein that determine its phase-separation behavior. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 11421–11431 (2020).
Google Scholar
Klein, I. A. et al. Partitioning of cancer therapeutics in nuclear condensates. Science 368, 1386–1392 (2020).
Google Scholar
Champeau, M. et al. 4D printing of hydrogels: a review. Adv. Funct. Mater. 30, 1910606 (2020).
Google Scholar
Cangialosi, A. et al. DNA sequence–directed shape change of photopatterned hydrogels via high-degree swelling. Science 357, 1126–1130 (2017).
Google Scholar
Praetorius, F. et al. Biotechnological mass production of DNA origami. Nature 552, 84–87 (2017).
Google Scholar
Barbee, M. H. et al. Protein-mimetic self-assembly with synthetic macromolecules. Macromolecules 54, 3585–3612 (2021).
Google Scholar
Chan, D. et al. Combinatorial polyacrylamide hydrogels for preventing biofouling on implantable biosensors. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.25.115675 (2021).
Upadhya, R. et al. Automation and data-driven design of polymer therapeutics. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 171, 1–28 (2021).
Google Scholar
Wu, D. et al. Polymers with controlled assembly and rigidity made with click-functional peptide bundles. Nature 574, 658–662 (2019).
Google Scholar
Seeman, N. C. & Sleiman, H. F. DNA nanotechnology. Nat. Rev. Mater. 3, 17068 (2017).
Buchberger, A., Simmons, C. R., Fahmi, N. E., Freeman, R. & Stephanopoulos, N. Hierarchical assembly of nucleic acid/coiled-coil peptide nanostructures. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 142, 1406–1416 (2020).
Google Scholar
An, B. et al. Programming living glue systems to perform autonomous mechanical repairs. Matter 3, 2080–2092 (2020).
Keeble, A. H. & Howarth, M. Power to the protein: enhancing and combining activities using the Spy toolbox. Chem. Sci. 11, 7281–7291 (2020).
Google Scholar
Nguyen, P. Q., Botyanszki, Z., Tay, P. K. R. & Joshi, N. S. Programmable biofilm-based materials from engineered curli nanofibres. Nat. Commun. 5, 4945 (2014).
Google Scholar
Charrier, M. et al. Engineering the S-layer of Caulobacter crescentus as a foundation for stable, high-density, 2D living materials. ACS Synth. Biol. 8, 181–190 (2019).
Google Scholar
Zhang, G., Johnston, T., Quin, M. B. & Schmidt-Dannert, C. Developing a protein scaffolding system for rapid enzyme immobilization and optimization of enzyme functions for biocatalysis. ACS Synth. Biol. 8, 1867–1876 (2019).
Google Scholar
Shadish, J. A., Strange, A. C. & Deforest, C. A. Genetically encoded photocleavable linkers for patterned protein release from biomaterials. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141, 15619–15625 (2019).
Google Scholar
Heveran, C. M. et al. Engineered ureolytic microorganisms can tailor the morphology and nanomechanical properties of microbial-precipitated calcium carbonate. Sci. Rep. 9, 14721 (2019).
Heveran, C. M. et al. Biomineralization and successive regeneration of engineered living building materials. Matter 2, 481–494 (2020).
Google Scholar
Nielsen, J. & Keasling, J. D. Engineering cellular metabolism. Cell 164, 1185–1197 (2016).
Google Scholar
Gilbert, C. et al. Living materials with programmable functionalities grown from engineered microbial co-cultures. Nat. Mater. 20, 691–700 (2021).
Duro-Royo, J., Van Zak, J., Tai, Y. J., Ling, A. S. & Oxman, N. in Challenges for Technology Innovation: An Agenda for the Future (eds da Silva, F. M. et al.) Ch. 39 (CRC, 2017).
Sachdeva, G., Garg, A., Godding, D., Way, J. C. & Silver, P. A. In vivo co-localization of enzymes on RNA scaffolds increases metabolic production in a geometrically dependent manner. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, 9493–9503 (2014).
Google Scholar
Park, S. J. et al. Phototactic guidance of a tissue-engineered soft-robotic ray. Science 353, 158–162 (2016).
Google Scholar
Morsut, L. et al. Engineering customized cell sensing and response behaviors using synthetic Notch receptors. Cell 164, 780–791 (2016).
Google Scholar
Schwarz, K. A., Daringer, N. M., Dolberg, T. B. & Leonard, J. N. Rewiring human cellular input–output using modular extracellular sensors. Nat. Chem. Biol. 13, 202–209 (2017).
Google Scholar
Loebel, C., Mauck, R. L. & Burdick, J. A. Local nascent protein deposition and remodelling guide mesenchymal stromal cell mechanosensing and fate in three-dimensional hydrogels. Nat. Mater. 18, 883–891 (2019).
Google Scholar
Ferreira, S. A. et al. Bi-directional cell–pericellular matrix interactions direct stem cell fate. Nat. Commun. 9, 4049 (2018).
Liu, H. et al. Bioenergetic-active materials enhance tissue regeneration by modulating cellular metabolic state. Sci. Adv. 6, 32232154 (2020).
Li, Y. C., Zhang, Y. S., Akpek, A., Shin, S. R. & Khademhosseini, A. 4D bioprinting: the next-generation technology for biofabrication enabled by stimuli-responsive materials. Biofabrication 9, 012001 (2017).
Nam, K. T. et al. Virus-enabled synthesis and assembly of nanowires for lithium ion battery electrodes. Science 312, 885–888 (2006).
Google Scholar
Kan, A. & Joshi, N. S. Towards the directed evolution of protein materials. MRS Commun. 9, 441–455 (2019).
Google Scholar
Green, M. L. et al. Fulfilling the promise of the materials genome initiative with high-throughput experimental methodologies. Appl. Phys. Rev. 4, 011105 (2017).
Algahtani, M. S. et al. High throughput screening for biomaterials discovery. J. Control. Release 190, 115–126 (2014).
Google Scholar
Agresti, J. J. et al. Ultrahigh-throughput screening in drop-based microfluidics for directed evolution. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 4004–4009 (2010).
Google Scholar
Ma, F. et al. Efficient molecular evolution to generate enantioselective enzymes using a dual-channel microfluidic droplet screening platform. Nat. Commun. 9, 1030 (2018).
Liu, Y. et al. Machine learning in materials genome initiative: a review. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 57, 113–122 (2020).
Voigt, C. A. Synthetic biology 2020–2030: six commercially-available products that are changing our world. Nat. Commun. 11, 6379 (2020).
Google Scholar
Beal, J. & Rogers, M. Levels of autonomy in synthetic biology engineering. Mol. Syst. Biol. 16, e10019 (2020).
Stowers, R. S. et al. Matrix stiffness induces a tumorigenic phenotype in mammary epithelium through changes in chromatin accessibility. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 3, 1009–1019 (2019).
