Preloader

Thin flexible lab-on-a-film for impedimetric sensing in biomedical applications

  • 1.

    Economou, A., Kokkinos, C. & Prodromidis, M. Flexible plastic, paper and textile lab-on-a chip platforms for electrochemical biosensing. Lab Chip 18, 1812–1830 (2018).

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • 2.

    Yang, Y., Yang, X., Tan, Y. & Yuan, Q. Recent progress in flexible and wearable bio-electronics based on nanomaterials. Nano Res. 10, 1560–1583 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  • 3.

    Arduini, F., Cinti, S., Scognamiglio, V., Moscone, D. & Palleschi, G. How cutting-edge technologies impact the design of electrochemical (bio) sensors for environmental analysis. A review. Anal. Chim. Acta. 959, 15–42 (2017).

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • 4.

    Zarei, M. Advances in point-of-care technologies for molecular diagnostics. Biosens. Bioelectron. 98, 494–506 (2017).

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • 5.

    Han, S. T. et al. An overview of the development of flexible sensors. Adv. Mater. 29, 1700375 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  • 6.

    Maddah, H. A. Polypropylene as a promising plastic: A review. Am. J. Polym. Sci. 6, 1–11 (2016).

    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • 7.

    Theodorou, D. N. & Suter, U. W. Detailed molecular structure of a vinyl polymer glass. Macromolecules 18, 1467–1478 (1985).

    ADS 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • 8.

    Teoh, S., Tang, Z. & Hastings, G. W. in Handbook of biomaterial properties 270–301 (Springer, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  • 9.

    Stojanović, G. in 2016 5th Mediterranean Conference on Embedded Computing (MECO). 4–6 (IEEE).

  • 10.

    Wang, Y., Yang, Q., Zhao, Y., Du, S. & Zhi, C. Recent advances in electrode fabrication for flexible energy-storage devices. Adv. Mater. Technol. 4, 1900083 (2019).

    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • 11.

    Yi, P., Zhu, Y. & Deng, Y. Fabrication and Applications of Flexible Transparent Electrodes Based on Silver Nanowires InFlexible Electronics (IntechOpen, 2018).

    Google Scholar 

  • 12.

    Zhang, C. et al. Fabrication of flexible silver nanowire conductive films and transmittance improvement based on moth-eye nanostructure array. J. Micromech. Microeng. 27, 075010 (2017).

    ADS 

    Google Scholar 

  • 13.

    Kassal, P., Steinberg, M. D., Horak, E. & Steinberg, I. M. Wireless fluorimeter for mobile and low cost chemical sensing: A paper based chloride assay. Sens. Actuators, B Chem. 275, 230–236 (2018).

    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • 14.

    Choi, J.-W. et al. 3-dimensional electrode patterning within a microfluidic channel using metal ion implantation. Lab Chip 10, 783–788 (2010).

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • 15.

    Focke, M. et al. Lab-on-a-Foil: Microfluidics on thin and flexible films. Lab Chip 10, 1365–1386 (2010).

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • 16.

    Tang, L.-J. et al. Progress in research of flexible MEMS microelectrodes for neural interface. Micromachines. 8, 281 (2017).

    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 17.

    Muhlberger, H., Hwang, W., Guber, A. E., Saile, V. & Hoffmann, W. Polymer lab-on-a-chip system with electrical detection. IEEE Sens. J. 8, 572–579 (2008).

    ADS 

    Google Scholar 

  • 18.

    Becker, H. & Locascio, L. E. Polymer microfluidic devices. Talanta 56, 267–287 (2002).

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • 19.

    Cogan, S. F. Neural stimulation and recording electrodes. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 10, 275–309 (2008).

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • 20.

    Becker, E., Ehrfeld, W., Hagmann, P., Maner, A. & Münchmeyer, D. Fabrication of microstructures with high aspect ratios and great structural heights by synchrotron radiation lithography, galvanoforming, and plastic moulding (LIGA process). Microelectron. Eng. 4, 35–56 (1986).

    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • 21.

    Yoshida, K., Farina, D., Akay, M. & Jensen, W. Multichannel intraneural and intramuscular techniques for multiunit recording and use in active prostheses. Proc. IEEE 98, 432–449 (2010).

    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • 22.

    Effenhauser, C. S., Bruin, G. J. & Paulus, A. Integrated chip-based capillary electrophoresis. Electrophoresis 18, 2203–2213 (1997).

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • 23.

    Ortiz-Catalan, M., Brånemark, R., Håkansson, B. & Delbeke, J. On the viability of implantable electrodes for the natural control of artificial limbs: Review and discussion. Biomed. Eng. Online 11, 1–24 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  • 24.

    Klein, R. Laser welding of plastics: materials, processes and industrial applications (John Wiley & Sons, 2012).

    Google Scholar 

  • 25.

    Toyama, S., Tanaka, Y., Ishikawa, Y. & Hara, K. Simple fabrication method to produce flexible electrode capable of soldering. Sens. Mater. 28, 279–288 (2016).

    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • 26.

    Kim, D.-H., Ghaffari, R., Lu, N. & Rogers, J. A. Flexible and stretchable electronics for biointegrated devices. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 14, 113–128 (2012).

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • 27.

    Pang, C., Lee, C. & Suh, K. Y. Recent advances in flexible sensors for wearable and implantable devices. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 130, 1429–1441 (2013).

    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • 28.

    Stassi, S., Cauda, V., Canavese, G. & Pirri, C. F. Flexible tactile sensing based on piezoresistive composites: A review. Sensors. 14, 5296–5332 (2014).

    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 29.

    Stoppa, M. & Chiolerio, A. Wearable electronics and smart textiles: A critical review. Sensors. 14, 11957–11992 (2014).

    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 30.

    Humbert, S., Lame, O. & Vigier, G. Polyethylene yielding behaviour: What is behind the correlation between yield stress and crystallinity?. Polymer 50, 3755–3761 (2009).

    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • 31.

    Ploypetchara, N., Suppakul, P., Atong, D. & Pechyen, C. Blend of polypropylene/poly (lactic acid) for medical packaging application: physicochemical, thermal, mechanical, and barrier properties. Energy Proc. 56, 201–210 (2014).

    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • 32.

    Râpă, M., Matei, E., Ghioca, P. N., Cincu, C. & Niculescu, M. Structural changes of modified polypropylene with thermoplastic elastomers for medical devices applications. J. Adhes. Sci. Technol. 30, 1727–1740 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  • 33.

    Allahvaisi, S. Polypropylene in the industry of food packaging. ISSBN, (2012).

  • 34.

    Farooq, A., Butt, N. Z. & Hassan, U. Biochip with multi-planar electrodes geometry for differentiation of non-spherical bioparticles in a microchannel. Sci. Rep. 11, 1–14 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  • 35.

    Sharma Rao B, Hashim U. Microfluidic Photomask Design Using CAD Software for Application in Lab-On-Chip Biomedical Nanodiagnostics. InAdvanced Materials Research. 795, 388–392 (2013) Trans Tech Publications Ltd.

  • 36.

    Clausen, C. H., Skands, G. E., Bertelsen, C. V. & Svendsen, W. E. Coplanar electrode layout optimized for increased sensitivity for electrical impedance spectroscopy. Micromachines. 6, 110–120 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  • 37.

    Ruano-López, J. M. et al. The SmartBioPhone™, a point of care vision under development through two European projects: OPTOLABCARD and LABONFOIL. Lab Chip 9, 1495–1499 (2009).

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • 38.

    Makal, U. & Wynne, K. J. Water induced hydrophobic surface. Langmuir 21, 3742–3745 (2005).

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • 39.

    Bhattacharyya, A. & Klapperich, C. M. Mechanical and chemical analysis of plasma and ultraviolet–ozone surface treatments for thermal bonding of polymeric microfluidic devices. Lab Chip 7, 876–882 (2007).

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • 40.

    Li, J. et al. Hot embossing/bonding of a poly (ethylene terephthalate)(PET) microfluidic chip. J. Micromech. Microeng. 18, 015008 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  • 41.

    Tsao, C., Hromada, L., Liu, J., Kumar, P. & DeVoe, D. L. Low temperature bonding of PMMA and COC microfluidic substrates using UV/ozone surface treatment. Lab Chip 7, 499–505 (2007).

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • 42.

    Deng, J., Wang, L., Liu, L. & Yang, W. Developments and new applications of UV-induced surface graft polymerizations. Prog. Polym. Sci. 34, 156–193 (2009).

    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • 43.

    Ozdemir, M. & Sadikoglu, H. A new and emerging technology: Laser-induced surface modification of polymers. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 9, 159–167 (1998).

    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • 44.

    Dong, R., Liu, Y., Mou, L., Deng, J. & Jiang, X. Microfluidics-based biomaterials and biodevices. Adv. Mater. 31, 1805033 (2019).

    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • 45.

    Iverson, B. D. & Garimella, S. V. Recent advances in microscale pumping technologies: A review and evaluation. Microfluid. Nanofluid. 5, 145–174 (2008).

    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • 46.

    Jeong, O. C., Park, S. W., Yang, S. S. & Pak, J. J. Fabrication of a peristaltic PDMS micropump. Sens. Actuators, A 123, 453–458 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  • 47.

    Naderi, A., Bhattacharjee, N. & Folch, A. Digital manufacturing for microfluidics. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 21, 325–364 (2019).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 48.

    Boglea, A., Olowinsky, A. & Gillner, A. Fibre laser welding for packaging of disposable polymeric microfluidic-biochips. Appl. Surf. Sci. 254, 1174–1178 (2007).

    ADS 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • 49.

    Brown, L., Koerner, T., Horton, J. H. & Oleschuk, R. D. Fabrication and characterization of poly (methylmethacrylate) microfluidic devices bonded using surface modifications and solvents. Lab Chip 6, 66–73 (2006).

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • 50.

    Bundgaard, F., Perozziello, G. & Geschke, O. Rapid prototyping tools and methods for all-Topas cyclic olefin copolymer fluidic microsystems. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. C J. Mech. Eng. Sci. 220, 1625–1632 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  • 51.

    Li, S. W., Xu, J. H., Wang, Y. J., Lu, Y. C. & Luo, G. S. Low-temperature bonding of poly-(methyl methacrylate) microfluidic devices under an ultrasonic field. J. Micromech. Microeng. 19, 015035 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  • 52.

    Paul, D., Pallandre, A., Miserere, S., Weber, J. & Viovy, J. L. Lamination-based rapid prototyping of microfluidic devices using flexible thermoplastic substrates. Electrophoresis 28, 1115–1122 (2007).

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • 53.

    Wise, R. J. & Froment, I. D. Microwave welding of thermoplastics. J. Mater. Sci. 36, 5935–5954 (2001).

    ADS 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • 54.

    Flachsbart, B. R. et al. Design and fabrication of a multilayered polymer microfluidic chip with nanofluidic interconnects via adhesive contact printing. Lab Chip 6, 667–674 (2006).

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • 55.

    Tang, K. C., Reboud, J., Kwok, Y. L., Peng, S. L. & Yobas, L. Lateral patch-clamping in a standard 1536-well microplate format. Lab Chip 10, 1044–1050 (2010).

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • 56.

    Kim, J. A. et al. Fabrication and characterization of a PDMS–glass hybrid continuous-flow PCR chip. Biochem. Eng. J. 29, 91–97 (2006).

    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • 57.

    Pascault, J.-P., Sautereau, H., Verdu, J. & Williams, R. J. Thermosetting Polymers Vol. 64 (CRC Press, 2002).

    Google Scholar 

  • 58.

    Wang, C., Gao, X., Mawatari, K. & Kitamori, T. Clogging-free irreversible bonding of polycarbonate membranes to glass microfluidic devices. J. Electrochem. Soc. 164, B3087 (2017).

    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • 59.

    Masteika, V., Kowal, J., Braithwaite, N. S. J. & Rogers, T. A review of hydrophilic silicon wafer bonding. ECS J. Solid State Sci. Technol. 3, 42 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  • 60.

    Hassan, U., Watkins, N., Edwards, C. & Bashir, R. Flow metering characterization within an electrical cell counting microfluidic device. Lab Chip 14, 1469–1476 (2014).

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • 61.

    Popelka, A., Zavahir, S. & Habib, S. Morphology analysis. In Polymer Science and Innovative Applications 21–68 (Elsevier, 2020).

    Google Scholar 

  • 62.

    Lim, J.-E. et al. Microstructural characterization of sputter-deposited Pt thin film electrode. J. Mater. Res. 19, 460–468 (2004).

    ADS 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • 63.

    Rand, M. J. Chemical vapor deposition of thin-film platinum. J. Electrochem. Soc. 120, 686 (1973).

    ADS 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • 64.

    Firebaugh, S. L., Jensen, K. F. & Schmidt, M. A. Investigation of high-temperature degradation of platinum thin films with an in situ resistance measurement apparatus. J. Microelectromech. Syst. 7, 128–135 (1998).

    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • 65.

    Lario, J., Fombuena, V., Vicente, Á. & Amigó, V. Influence of heat treatment and UV irradiation on the wettability of Ti35Nb10Ta nanotubes. Metals. 8, 37 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  • 66.

    Areid, N. et al. Effect of ultraviolet light treatment on surface hydrophilicity and human gingival fibroblast response on nanostructured titanium surfaces. Clin. Exp. Dent. Res. 4, 78–85 (2018).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 67.

    Morent, R. et al. Comparison between XPS‐and FTIR‐analysis of plasma‐treated polypropylene film surfaces. An International Journal devoted to the development and application of techniques for the analysis of surfaces, interfaces and thin films, 40, 597–600 (2008).

  • 68.

    Carrino, L., Moroni, G. & Polini, W. Cold plasma treatment of polypropylene surface: A study on wettability and adhesion. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 121, 373–382 (2002).

    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • 69.

    Kwon, O.-J. et al. Surface characteristics of polypropylene film treated by an atmospheric pressure plasma. Surf. Coat. Technol. 192, 1–10 (2005).

    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • 70.

    Pandiyaraj, K. N., Selvarajan, V., Deshmukh, R. & Gao, C. Modification of surface properties of polypropylene (PP) film using DC glow discharge air plasma. Appl. Surf. Sci. 255, 3965–3971 (2009).

    ADS 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • 71.

    Zhu, B., Iwata, H., Hirata, I. & Ikada, Y. Hydrophilic modification of a polyimide film surface. J. Adhes. Sci. Technol. 14, 351–361 (2000).

    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • 72.

    Lin, Y.-S. & Liu, H.-M. Enhanced adhesion of plasma-sputtered copper films on polyimide substrates by oxygen glow discharge for microelectronics. Thin Solid Films 516, 1773–1780 (2008).

    ADS 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • 73.

    Tsukruk, V. V. & Bliznyuk, V. N. Adhesive and friction forces between chemically modified silicon and silicon nitride surfaces. Langmuir 14, 446–455 (1998).

    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • 74.

    Heise, A. et al. Grafting of polypeptides on solid substrates by initiation of N-carboxyanhydride polymerization by amino-terminated self-assembled monolayers. Langmuir 13, 723–728 (1997).

    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • 75.

    Sunkara, V. et al. Simple room temperature bonding of thermoplastics and poly (dimethylsiloxane). Lab Chip 11, 962–965 (2011).

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • 76.

    Morra, M. et al. On the aging of oxygen plasma-treated polydimethylsiloxane surfaces. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 137, 11–24 (1990).

    ADS 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • 77.

    Aran, K., Sasso, L. A., Kamdar, N. & Zahn, J. D. Irreversible, direct bonding of nanoporous polymer membranes to PDMS or glass microdevices. Lab Chip 10, 548–552 (2010).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 78.

    Carminati, M. et al. Miniaturized impedance flow cytometer: Design rules and integrated readout. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Circuits Syst. 11, 1438–1449 (2017).

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • 79.

    Clausen, C. H. et al. Bacteria detection and differentiation using impedance flow cytometry. Sensors 18, 3496 (2018).

    ADS 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 80.

    Gawad, S., Schild, L. & Renaud, P. Micromachined impedance spectroscopy flow cytometer for cell analysis and particle sizing. Lab Chip 1, 76–82 (2001).

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • 81.

    Iqbal, S. M. A. & Butt, N. Z. Design and analysis of microfluidic cell counter using spice simulation. SN Appl. Sci. 1, 1–10 (2019).

    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • 82.

    Sa, C., Ganesan, N. & Lokeswari, T. S. Comparison of differentiation to macrophages in isolated monocytes from human peripheral blood and THP1 cells. Sri Ramachandra Journal of Medicine. 7 (2014).

  • 83.

    Ruban, G. I., Kosmacheva, S. M., Goncharova, N. V., Van Bockstaele, D. & Loiko, V. A. Investigation of morphometric parameters for granulocytes and lymphocytes as applied to a solution of direct and inverse light-scattering problems. J. Biomed. Opt. 12, 044017 (2007).

    ADS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • 84.

    Menck, K. et al. Isolation of human monocytes by double gradient centrifugation and their differentiation to macrophages in teflon-coated cell culture bags. J. Vis. Exp. JoVE. 2, 2 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  • 85.

    Bennett, J. et al. The morphological classification of acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: Concordance among observers and clinical correlations. Br. J. Haematol. 47, 553–561 (1981).

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • 86.

    Xie, X. et al. Particle self-aligning, focusing, and electric impedance microcytometer device for label-free single cell morphology discrimination and yeast budding analysis. Anal. Chem. 91, 13398–13406 (2019).

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • 87.

    Schade-Kampmann, G., Huwiler, A., Hebeisen, M., Hessler, T. & Di Berardino, M. On-chip non-invasive and label-free cell discrimination by impedance spectroscopy. Cell Prolif. 41, 830–840 (2008).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 88.

    Holmes, D. & Morgan, H. Single cell impedance cytometry for identification and counting of CD4 T-cells in human blood using impedance labels. Anal. Chem. 82, 1455–1461 (2010).

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • 89.

    Cheung, K., Gawad, S. & Renaud, P. Impedance spectroscopy flow cytometry: On-chip label-free cell differentiation. Cytometry A 65, 124–132 (2005).

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • 90.

    Shashni, B. et al. Size-based differentiation of cancer and normal cells by a particle size analyzer assisted by a cell-recognition PC software. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 41, 487–503 (2018).

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • 91.

    Hassan, U. et al. A microfluidic biochip for complete blood cell counts at the point-of-care. Technology 3, 201–213 (2015).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 92.

    Watkins, N. N. et al. A microfabricated electrical differential counter for the selective enumeration of CD4+ T lymphocytes. Lab Chip 11, 1437–1447 (2011).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 93.

    Hassan, U., Watkins, N. N., Reddy, B., Damhorst, G. & Bashir, R. Microfluidic differential immunocapture biochip for specific leukocyte counting. Nat. Protoc. 11, 714–726 (2016).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 94.

    Ahuja, K. et al. Toward point-of-care assessment of patient response: A portable tool for rapidly assessing cancer drug efficacy using multifrequency impedance cytometry and supervised machine learning. Microsyst. Nanoeng. 5, 1–11 (2019).

    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • 95.

    Mok, J., Mindrinos, M. N., Davis, R. W. & Javanmard, M. Digital microfluidic assay for protein detection. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 111, 2110–2115 (2014).

    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 96.

    Watkins, N. N. et al. Microfluidic CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocyte counters for point-of-care HIV diagnostics using whole blood. Sci. Transl. Med. 5, 214 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  • 97.

    Yang, L. & Bashir, R. Electrical/electrochemical impedance for rapid detection of foodborne pathogenic bacteria. Biotechnol. Adv. 26, 135–150 (2008).

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Source link