Shalem, O. et al. Genome-scale CRISPR-Cas9 knockout screening in human cells. Science 343, 84–87 (2014).
Google Scholar
Wang, T., Wei, J. J., Sabatini, D. M. & Lander, E. S. Genetic screens in human cells using the CRISPR–Cas9 system. Science 343, 80–84 (2014).
Google Scholar
Joung, J. et al. Genome-scale CRISPR–Cas9 knockout and transcriptional activation screening. Nat. Protoc. 12, 828–863 (2017).
Google Scholar
Parnas, O. et al. A genome-wide CRISPR screen in primary immune cells to dissect regulatory networks. Cell 162, 675–686 (2015).
Google Scholar
Dixit, A. et al. Perturb-Seq: dissecting molecular circuits with scalable single-cell RNA profiling of pooled genetic screens. Cell 167, 1853–1866.e17 (2016).
Google Scholar
Adamson, B. et al. A multiplexed single-cell CRISPR screening platform enables systematic dissection of the unfolded protein response. Cell 167, 1867–1882.e21 (2016).
Google Scholar
Jaitin, D. A. et al. Dissecting immune circuits by linking CRISPR-pooled screens with single-cell RNA-seq. Cell 167, 1883–1896.e15 (2016).
Google Scholar
Wroblewska, A. et al. Protein barcodes enable high-dimensional single-cell CRISPR screens. Cell 175, 1141–1155.e16 (2018).
Google Scholar
Rubin, A. J. et al. Coupled single-cell CRISPR screening and epigenomic profiling reveals causal gene regulatory networks. Cell 176, 361–376.e17 (2019).
Google Scholar
Mimitou, E. P. et al. Multiplexed detection of proteins, transcriptomes, clonotypes and CRISPR perturbations in single cells. Nat. Methods 16, 409–412 (2019).
Google Scholar
Dhainaut, M. et al. Perturb-map enables CRISPR genomics with spatial resolution and identifies regulators of tumor immune composition. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.07.13.451021 (2021).
Neumann, B. et al. Phenotypic profiling of the human genome by time-lapse microscopy reveals cell division genes. Nature 464, 721–727 (2010).
Google Scholar
Collinet, C. et al. Systems survey of endocytosis by multiparametric image analysis. Nature 464, 243–249 (2010).
Google Scholar
Orvedahl, A. et al. Image-based genome-wide siRNA screen identifies selective autophagy factors. Nature 480, 113–117 (2011).
Google Scholar
Karlas, A. et al. Genome-wide RNAi screen identifies human host factors crucial for influenza virus replication. Nature 463, 818–822 (2010).
Google Scholar
Mercer, J. et al. RNAi screening reveals proteasome- and Cullin3-dependent stages in vaccinia virus infection. Cell Rep. 2, 1036–1047 (2012).
Google Scholar
Agaisse, H. et al. Genome-wide RNAi screen for host factors required for intracellular bacterial infection. Science 309, 1248–1251 (2005).
Google Scholar
Saka, S. K. et al. Immuno-SABER enables highly multiplexed and amplified protein imaging in tissues. Nat. Biotechnol. 37, 1080–1090 (2019).
Google Scholar
Codeluppi, S. et al. Spatial organization of the somatosensory cortex revealed by osmFISH. Nat. Methods 15, 932–935 (2018).
Google Scholar
Lin, J.-R., Fallahi-Sichani, M. & Sorger, P. K. Highly multiplexed imaging of single cells using a high-throughput cyclic immunofluorescence method. Nat. Commun. 6, 8390 (2015).
Google Scholar
Gut, G., Herrmann, M. D. & Pelkmans, L. Multiplexed protein maps link subcellular organization to cellular states. Science 361, (2018).
Regot, S., Hughey, J. J., Bajar, B. T., Carrasco, S. & Covert, M. W. High-sensitivity measurements of multiple kinase activities in live single cells. Cell 157, 1724–1734 (2014).
Google Scholar
Hochbaum, D. R. et al. All-optical electrophysiology in mammalian neurons using engineered microbial rhodopsins. Nat. Methods 11, 825–833 (2014).
Google Scholar
Zhao, Y. et al. An expanded palette of genetically encoded Ca2+ indicators. Science 333, 1888–1891 (2011).
Google Scholar
Lin, M. Z. & Schnitzer, M. J. Genetically encoded indicators of neuronal activity. Nat. Neurosci. 19, 1142–1153 (2016).
Google Scholar
Nelson, D. E. et al. Oscillations in NF-κB signaling control the dynamics of gene expression. Science 306, 704–708 (2004).
Google Scholar
Cohen-Saidon, C., Cohen, A. A., Sigal, A., Liron, Y. & Alon, U. Dynamics and variability of ERK2 response to EGF in individual living cells. Mol. Cell 36, 885–893 (2009).
Google Scholar
Albeck, J. G., Mills, G. B. & Brugge, J. S. Frequency-modulated pulses of ERK activity transmit quantitative proliferation signals. Mol. Cell 49, 249–261 (2013).
Google Scholar
Lahav, G. et al. Dynamics of the p53–Mdm2 feedback loop in individual cells. Nat. Genet. 36, 147–150 (2004).
Google Scholar
Biederer, T. & Scheiffele, P. Mixed-culture assays for analyzing neuronal synapse formation. Nat. Protoc. 2, 670–676 (2007).
Google Scholar
Scheiffele, P., Fan, J., Choih, J., Fetter, R. & Serafini, T. Neuroligin expressed in nonneuronal cells triggers presynaptic development in contacting axons. Cell 101, 657–669 (2000).
Google Scholar
Varadarajan, N. et al. A high-throughput single-cell analysis of human CD8+ T cell functions reveals discordance for cytokine secretion and cytolysis. J. Clin. Invest. 121, 4322–4331 (2011).
Google Scholar
Moen, E. et al. Deep learning for cellular image analysis. Nat. Methods 16, 1233–1246 (2019).
Google Scholar
Grys, B. T. et al. Machine learning and computer vision approaches for phenotypic profiling. J. Cell Biol. 216, 65–71 (2016).
Google Scholar
Caicedo, J. C. et al. Data-analysis strategies for image-based cell profiling. Nat. Methods 14, 849–863 (2017).
Google Scholar
Caicedo, J. C., McQuin, C., Goodman, A., Singh, S. & Carpenter, A. E. Weakly supervised learning of single-cell feature embeddings. Proc. IEEE Comput. Soc. Conf. Comput. Vis. Pattern Recognit. 2018, 9309–9318 (2018).
Google Scholar
Kobayashi, H., Cheveralls, K. C., Leonetti, M. D. & Royer, L. A. Self-supervised deep-learning encodes high-resolution features of protein subcellular localization. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.03.29.437595 (2021).
Strezoska, Ž. et al. High-content analysis screening for cell cycle regulators using arrayed synthetic crRNA libraries. J. Biotechnol. 251, 189–200 (2017).
Google Scholar
Kim, H. S. et al. Arrayed CRISPR screen with image-based assay reliably uncovers host genes required for coxsackievirus infection. Genome Res 28, 859–868 (2018).
Google Scholar
de Groot, R., Lüthi, J., Lindsay, H., Holtackers, R. & Pelkmans, L. Large-scale image-based profiling of single-cell phenotypes in arrayed CRISPR–Cas9 gene perturbation screens. Mol. Syst. Biol. 14, e8064 (2018).
Google Scholar
Michlits, G. et al. CRISPR-UMI: single-cell lineage tracing of pooled CRISPR–Cas9 screens. Nat. Methods 14, 1191–1197 (2017).
Google Scholar
Schmierer, B. et al. CRISPR/Cas9 screening using unique molecular identifiers. Mol. Syst. Biol. 13, 945 (2017).
Google Scholar
Ke, R. et al. In situ sequencing for RNA analysis in preserved tissue and cells. Nat. Methods 10, 857–860 (2013).
Google Scholar
Larsson, C., Grundberg, I., Söderberg, O. & Nilsson, M. In situ detection and genotyping of individual mRNA molecules. Nat. Methods 7, 395–397 (2010).
Google Scholar
Feldman, D. et al. Optical pooled screens in human cells. Cell 179, 787–799.e17 (2019).
Google Scholar
Funk, L. et al. The phenotypic landscape of essential human genes. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.11.28.470116 (2021).
Lawson, M. J. et al. In situ genotyping of a pooled strain library after characterizing complex phenotypes. Mol. Syst. Biol. 13, 947 (2017).
Google Scholar
Camsund, D. et al. Time-resolved imaging-based CRISPRi screening. Nat. Methods 17, 86–92 (2020).
Google Scholar
Emanuel, G., Moffitt, J. R. & Zhuang, X. High-throughput, image-based screening of pooled genetic-variant libraries. Nat. Methods 14, 1159–1162 (2017).
Google Scholar
Wang, C., Lu, T., Emanuel, G., Babcock, H. P. & Zhuang, X. Imaging-based pooled CRISPR screening reveals regulators of lncRNA localization. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 10842–10851 (2019).
Google Scholar
Datlinger, P. et al. Pooled CRISPR screening with single-cell transcriptome readout. Nat. Methods 14, 297–301 (2017).
Google Scholar
Hasle, N. et al. High-throughput, microscope-based sorting to dissect cellular heterogeneity. Mol. Syst. Biol. 16, e9442 (2020).
Google Scholar
Yan, X. et al. High-content imaging-based pooled CRISPR screens in mammalian cells. J. Cell Biol. 220, (2021).
Lee, J. et al. Versatile phenotype-activated cell sorting. Sci. Adv. 6, eabb7438 (2020).
Google Scholar
Kanfer, G. et al. Image-based pooled whole-genome CRISPRi screening for subcellular phenotypes. J. Cell Biol. 220, (2021).
Wheeler, E. C. et al. Pooled CRISPR screens with imaging on microraft arrays reveals stress granule-regulatory factors. Nat. Methods 17, 636–642 (2020).
Google Scholar
Stringer, C., Wang, T., Michaelos, M. & Pachitariu, M. Cellpose: a generalist algorithm for cellular segmentation. Nat. Methods 18, 100–106 (2021).
Google Scholar
McQuin, C. et al. CellProfiler 3.0: next-generation image processing for biology. PLOS Biol. 16, e2005970 (2018).
Google Scholar
Reicher, A., Koren, A. & Kubicek, S. Pooled protein tagging, cellular imaging, and in situ sequencing for monitoring drug action in real time. Genome Res. 30, 1846–1855 (2020).
Google Scholar
Feldman, D., Singh, A., Garrity, A. J. & Blainey, P. C. Lentiviral co-packaging mitigates the effects of intermolecular recombination and multiple integrations in pooled genetic screens. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/262121 (2018).
Schindelin, J. et al. Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat. Methods 9, 676–682 (2012).
Google Scholar
Edelstein, A. D. et al. Advanced methods of microscope control using μManager software. J. Biol. Methods 1, e10 (2014).
Google Scholar
Schmid-Burgk, J. L. et al. Highly parallel profiling of Cas9 variant specificity. Mol. Cell 78, 794–800.e8 (2020).
Google Scholar
Feldman, D. & Funk, L. Pooled genetic perturbation screens with image-based phenotypes, OpticalPooledScreens. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5002684 (2021).
Kosuri, S. et al. Scalable gene synthesis by selective amplification of DNA pools from high-fidelity microchips. Nat. Biotechnol. 28, 1295–1299 (2010).
Google Scholar
Doench, J. G. et al. Rational design of highly active sgRNAs for CRISPR-Cas9–mediated gene inactivation. Nat. Biotechnol. 32, 1262–1267 (2014).
Google Scholar
Kutner, R. H., Zhang, X.-Y. & Reiser, J. Production, concentration and titration of pseudotyped HIV-1-based lentiviral vectors. Nat. Protoc. 4, 495–505 (2009).
Google Scholar
Köster, J. & Rahmann, S. Snakemake—a scalable bioinformatics workflow engine. Bioinformatics 28, 2520–2522 (2012).
Google Scholar
Williams, E. et al. Image Data Resource: a bioimage data integration and publication platform. Nat. Methods 14, 775–781 (2017).
Google Scholar
Luo, B. et al. Highly parallel identification of essential genes in cancer cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 20380–20385 (2008).
Google Scholar
Li, W. et al. MAGeCK enables robust identification of essential genes from genome-scale CRISPR/Cas9 knockout screens. Genome Biol. 15, 554 (2014).
Google Scholar
